Friday

29th Mar 2024

Opinion

The truth behind the Court of Auditors report

  • The Court of Auditors said this week for the first time that the EU's accounts gave a "fair representation" of its finances (Photo: European Community)

Every November, when the European Court of Auditors publishes its annual audit, eurosceptics, without fail, jump up and down saying that EU spending is riddled with fraud and corruption and can't sign off its own accounts. This year is just the same.

But, after taking a look at what the Court of Auditors (CoA) report actually says, the reality is somewhat different. For starters, the CoA, for the first time, states that the EU's accounts give a "fair representation …in all material respects" of its finances. In other words, the accounts themselves were signed off, but the CoA could not give a "statement of assurance" that all the actual financial transactions of EU money had been done in accordance with the rules.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Get the EU news that really matters

Instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

In this, the EU is not alone. EU spending shares the weakness common to many large organisations, governments, ministries and international bodies: money is spent over such a range of activities and in so many places that the auditors cannot guarantee that the exact amounts are always and everywhere spent correctly. The US federal budget has not had a positive statement of assurance for about 10 years. The UK's Department for Work and Pensions has not had its equivalent statement for the last 15 years - and its budget is larger than that of the whole EU!

It should also be borne in mind that the European CoA works to more stringent criteria than most. Only if the error rate (and note that "error" is not fraud, but includes incomplete paperwork) is less than 2 percent does the CoA deem the European Commission's supervisory and control systems to be effective, between 2 percent and 5 percent is deemed "partially effective" and anything above 5 percent is deemed to be "not effective." Sir John Bourn, former head of the UK National Audit Office, has said that if he had used the same system as the CoA, he would have had to disqualify the whole of UK government expenditure.

After analysing the CoA report, the notion that there is systemic fraud can be immediately squashed. Since 2003, the Court of Auditors has referred a total of only 14 cases of suspected fraud to the EU's anti-fraud office which is responsible for investigation. Given the thousands of transactions examined every year, this is a remarkably low number. Although there are shortcomings, both at European Commission and national level, the problem is one of improving procedures and systems, in certain policy fields and certain countries in particular.

A mixed picture

The detail of the CoA's report gives a nuanced picture. As far as the EU's institutions themselves are concerned, the CoA gives an unqualified clean bill of health to their administrative expenditure, as it does for EU revenue. In terms of policy spending, for economic and financial affairs, the court also gives a clean bill of health, while it notes improvements, at national level, to the supervisory and control systems in the areas of research, energy, transport, and, at commission level, in the areas of external aid, and enlargement.

But in the largest area of EU spending - agricultural spending, environmental protection and CAP payments - the CoA finds that supervisory and control systems are only "partially" effective.

The court identified a number of weaknesses amongst Member States in terms of "day-to-day" checks to verify costs, tendering procedures and declarations of expenditure. In particular, the systems of checking payments and contracts in Bulgaria were found to be defective. However, blaming the EU institutions for mistakes made by national authorities, as a commission spokesman has said, is "like a referee in a football match getting the blame for fouls committed by players."

Nonetheless, for such cases, existing commission rules, whereby payments are only made if certain performance indicators are met, should be strengthened, and made time-bound, clear and unambiguous. In its conclusions, the court calls on the commission to make better use of corrective instruments such as payment suspension and financial corrections and recoveries. This advice should be urgently heeded by the commission.

For my part, I would also like to see a system where the annual statements of assurance had to be given to each commission department and each of the 27 national governments individually, rather than in one single statement for the whole EU. Governments would then have to take full responsibility for the EU funds managed by them with proper auditing at national level. If there were shortcomings in national authorities in appropriating EU funds, then funds could be recouped in the following year's budget. This would also improve the accuracy of the information provided and increase confidence in the system.

The process towards such a system has already started - 2007 was the first year in which Member States were required to produce an annual summary of all available audits and declarations. But this should be strengthened and made as comprehensive as possible.

Maybe one day we will be able to have a sensible and dispassionate debate in Britain about the EU budget and the way the cash is distributed. But I'm not holding my breath.

The author is a UK labour Member of the European Parliament for Yorkshire and the Humber

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

EU Modernisation Fund: an open door for fossil gas in Romania

Among the largest sources of financing for energy transition of central and eastern European countries, the €60bn Modernisation Fund remains far from the public eye. And perhaps that's one reason it is often used for financing fossil gas projects.

Why UK-EU defence and security deal may be difficult

Rather than assuming a pro-European Labour government in London will automatically open doors in Brussels, the Labour party needs to consider what it may be able to offer to incentivise EU leaders to factor the UK into their defence thinking.

Column

EU's Gaza policy: boon for dictators, bad for democrats

While they woo dictators and autocrats, EU policymakers are becoming ever more estranged from the world's democrats. The real tragedy is the erosion of one of Europe's key assets: its huge reserves of soft power, writes Shada Islam.

Why UK-EU defence and security deal may be difficult

Rather than assuming a pro-European Labour government in London will automatically open doors in Brussels, the Labour party needs to consider what it may be able to offer to incentivise EU leaders to factor the UK into their defence thinking.

Column

EU's Gaza policy: boon for dictators, bad for democrats

While they woo dictators and autocrats, EU policymakers are becoming ever more estranged from the world's democrats. The real tragedy is the erosion of one of Europe's key assets: its huge reserves of soft power, writes Shada Islam.

Latest News

  1. Kenyan traders react angrily to proposed EU clothes ban
  2. Lawyer suing Frontex takes aim at 'antagonistic' judges
  3. Orban's Fidesz faces low-polling jitters ahead of EU election
  4. German bank freezes account of Jewish peace group
  5. EU Modernisation Fund: an open door for fossil gas in Romania
  6. 'Swiftly dial back' interest rates, ECB told
  7. Moscow's terror attack, security and Gaza
  8. Why UK-EU defence and security deal may be difficult

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic Food Systems Takeover at COP28
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersHow women and men are affected differently by climate policy
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersArtist Jessie Kleemann at Nordic pavilion during UN climate summit COP28
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP28: Gathering Nordic and global experts to put food and health on the agenda
  5. Friedrich Naumann FoundationPoems of Liberty – Call for Submission “Human Rights in Inhume War”: 250€ honorary fee for selected poems
  6. World BankWorld Bank report: How to create a future where the rewards of technology benefit all levels of society?

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsThis autumn Europalia arts festival is all about GEORGIA!
  2. UNOPSFostering health system resilience in fragile and conflict-affected countries
  3. European Citizen's InitiativeThe European Commission launches the ‘ImagineEU’ competition for secondary school students in the EU.
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region is stepping up its efforts to reduce food waste
  5. UNOPSUNOPS begins works under EU-funded project to repair schools in Ukraine
  6. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsGeorgia effectively prevents sanctions evasion against Russia – confirm EU, UK, USA

Join EUobserver

EU news that matters

Join us