Wednesday

31st Aug 2016

EU must apologise for complicity in CIA rendition, say MEPs

  • The CIA rendition programme began following the September 11 terrorist attacks (Photo: NATO)

EU governments should apologise collectively for continuing to turn a blind eye to CIA rendition sites on their soil, according to a key European Parliament committee.

Speaking after the Parliament's Justice and Civil Liberties committee backed her report by 50 votes to 2 with 5 abstentions earlier this week, Helene Flautre, a French Green MEP, criticised governments for having "not properly fulfilled their obligation under international law to investigate serious human rights violations connected with the CIA programme".

Dear EUobserver reader

Subscribe now for unrestricted access to EUobserver.

Sign up for 30 days' free trial, no obligation. Full subscription only 15 € / month or 150 € / year.

  1. Unlimited access on desktop and mobile
  2. All premium articles, analysis, commentary and investigations
  3. EUobserver archives

EUobserver is the only independent news media covering EU affairs in Brussels and all 28 member states.

♡ We value your support.

If you already have an account click here to login.

The CIA's extraordinary rendition programme, where terrorist suspects were transferred by plane to secret detention centre, was launched by the Bush administration as part of the "war on terror" following the September 11 attacks. Over 1,000 CIA flights are estimated to have used European airspace between 2001 and 2005.

Eleven EU countries - Germany, Sweden, Spain, Ireland, Greece, Cyprus, Denmark, Romania, Italy, Poland, Portugal and Britain - have faced allegations of involvement in extraordinary renditions and secret detention centres used by the US intelligence service.

MEPs are critical that no action has been taken by the European Commission and Council, representing member states, to determine the involvement of member states.

"Despite a huge amount of evidence on illegal detention and rendition most national governments have failed to follow up and there has been a kind of omerta in Council on it," said a spokesman for the Green group.

Meanwhile, Dutch Liberal MEP Sophie In't Veld described the EU's silence as a "disgrace", adding that "Europe loses credibility and moral authority unless it comes clean about its own role in the CIA renditions and black site programme".

The report, which comes five years after the assembly's temporary committee on extraordinary rendition adopted its first report by Italian socialist Claudio Fava, highlights new revelations of human rights violations and the complicity of EU governments with the CIA.

Among its recommendations, the report called on Romania and Poland to launch independent inquiries into alleged CIA detentions on their territory, but welcomed suggestions that Lithuanian government authorities were prepared to re-open investigations.

A report by the Lithuanian parliamentary committee on two detention sites led an MEP delegation to visit the country in April 2012.

Finland, Denmark and Portugal were also asked to "disclose all necessary information on all suspect planes associated with the CIA and their territory." The report, which is not legally binding, will be debated and voted on by MEPs in Strasbourg in September.

As expected, MEPs representing countries subject to allegations came under domestic pressure to water down the report.

A senior Parliament source claimed that the Romania delegations had been among those tabling multiple amendments "seeking to dumb down sections dealing with abuses in their countries", although Flautre praised MEPs for having "stood firm and voted in favour of the report" despite coming up against "considerable pressure from national interests seeking to keep a lid on these allegations".

The Parliament report built on conclusions reached in an internal paper published in June by the Parliament's policy department challenged the legitimacy of the internal inquiries organised by member states.

In all cases, member state governments denied any involvement, before setting up internal parliamentary inquiries or judicial inquiries conducted by the state judiciary. While no inquiry has yet implicated a member state, the report insisted that the procedures had "accountability challenges which taint the clearance, impartiality and objectivity of the final results".

It added that "politics and state secrecy playing fundamental roles in preventing disclose of the truth and access to justice".

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EBECBright Engineering Students Designed the Future, Today at the BEST Competition
  2. Access NowInternet wins! Net Neutrality Victory in EU
  3. EuridThe 2016 .eu Web Awards is a Chance to Make Dreams Come True so Vote Today !
  4. Nordic CouncilNordic-Baltic Co-operation Vital in Turbulent Times
  5. GoogleBrussels: Home of Beer, Fries, Chocolate and Google’s Policy Team - follow @GoogleBrussels
  6. HuaweiSeeds for the Future Programme to Bring Students to China for ICT Training
  7. EFASpain is Not a Democratic State. EFA Expresses Solidarity to A. Otegi and EH Bildu
  8. UNICEFBoko Haram Violence in Lake Chad Region Leaves Children Displaced and Trapped
  9. HuaweiMaking Cities Smarter and Safer
  10. GoogleHow Google Makes Connections More Secure For Users
  11. EGBAThe EU Court of Justice Applies Proportionality in Assessing Gambling Laws
  12. World VisionThe EU and Member States Must Not Use Overseas Aid for Promoting EU Interests

Latest News

  1. Verheugen went off-script in VW cheat testimony
  2. Poland may remove constitutional judges
  3. Spain's Rajoy faces uphill battle to win MPs' support
  4. Russia and Turkey restart talks on EU gas pipeline
  5. MEPs call for reconciliation with Turkey
  6. Egypt blames EU-Turkey deal for refugee spike
  7. EU dithering aggravated refugee crisis, Merkel says
  8. Verheugen did not think VW cheating was morally possible