Friday

29th Mar 2024

EU data retention law could harm free press

The EU's new data retention law risks helping governments snoop on reporters' contacts in the name of combating terror, leading journalists warned justice commissioner Franco Frattini in Brussels on Tuesday (25 April).

"The directive has serious implications for protection of sources," Germany's Stern magazine reporter Hans-Martin Tillack said at a debate on press freedom. "Protection of sources is the basis of journalistic work everywhere in the free world."

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Get the EU news that really matters

Instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The data retention bill, passed in February with implementation tabled for late 2007, obliges EU governments to store information on who called who and who emailed who for at least six months.

But press leaks based on anonymity help to create "critical debate and controversy" in democratic states Mr Tillack explained, praising the Washington Post's recent role in securing anonymous information on alleged CIA camps in Europe.

The US government eventually found and sacked CIA analyst Mary McCarthy for her part in the revelations.

EU institutions have already used their influence to try and stifle "unfriendly stories" in the past, the Stern writer said, highlighting the European Commission's crackdown on his own reporting of EU fraud in the past four years.

Belgian police in 2004 seized Mr Tillack's contact books due to commission allegations that he secured leaks by bribery, with the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) worried that commission access to Mr Tillack's papers is being used to scare off future whistleblowers.

IFJ head Aidan White indicated that member states' powers of surveillance are being extended "with no end in sight" in the post 11 September 2001 "global war on terror."

The situation stands in contrast to past "classical war" scenarios when some civil rights were suspended for the duration of the conflict only, or to free reporting of terrorism in Northern Ireland in the 1970s and 1980s.

"When will the commission say the global war on terror is over? That when this happens, we'll take all this back and go back to normal?" he asked the justice commissioner.

Mr Frattini answered by pledging to try and find "the right balance" between security and civil rights but stated that the current terrorist threat is different to what came before.

"Is it possible to compare the Red Brigade or Irish terrorists with the new international terrorism threat? My first answer is no," he said, adding that he expects broad public support for the EU's counter-terror campaign.

Journalists should be free to talk to contacts from the EU's list of terrorist groups, Mr Frattini indicated, so they can "make citizens aware that terrorism is one of the most serious threats to us."

But reporters should face legal penalties if their actions amount to helping terror organisations do their work.

Mr Frattini promised that access to the new data retention tools will be strictly limited to officials such as public prosecutors.

EU Parliament set to sue EU Commission over Hungary funds

The European Parliament will likely take the European Commission to court for unblocking more than €10bn in funds for Hungary last December. A final nod of approval is still needed by European Parliament president, Roberta Metsola.

EU Commission clears Poland's access to up to €137bn EU funds

The European Commission has legally paved the way for Poland to access up to €137bn EU funds, following Donald Tusk's government's efforts to strengthen the independence of their judiciary and restore the rule of law in the country.

Opinion

Potential legal avenues to prosecute Navalny's killers

The UN could launch an independent international investigation into Navalny's killing, akin to investigation I conducted on Jamal Khashoggi's assassination, or on Navalny's Novichok poisoning, in my role as special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, writes the secretary-general of Amnesty International.

Opinion

I'll be honest — Moldova's judicial system isn't fit for EU

To state a plain truth: at present, Moldova does not have a justice system worthy of a EU member state; it is riven with corruption and lax and inconsistent standards, despite previous attempts at reform, writes Moldova's former justice minister.

Latest News

  1. Kenyan traders react angrily to proposed EU clothes ban
  2. Lawyer suing Frontex takes aim at 'antagonistic' judges
  3. Orban's Fidesz faces low-polling jitters ahead of EU election
  4. German bank freezes account of Jewish peace group
  5. EU Modernisation Fund: an open door for fossil gas in Romania
  6. 'Swiftly dial back' interest rates, ECB told
  7. Moscow's terror attack, security and Gaza
  8. Why UK-EU defence and security deal may be difficult

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic Food Systems Takeover at COP28
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersHow women and men are affected differently by climate policy
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersArtist Jessie Kleemann at Nordic pavilion during UN climate summit COP28
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP28: Gathering Nordic and global experts to put food and health on the agenda
  5. Friedrich Naumann FoundationPoems of Liberty – Call for Submission “Human Rights in Inhume War”: 250€ honorary fee for selected poems
  6. World BankWorld Bank report: How to create a future where the rewards of technology benefit all levels of society?

Join EUobserver

EU news that matters

Join us