Friday

29th Mar 2024

EU to have common rules for returning illegal migrants

  • The measures were agreed after lengthy negotiations (Photo: AFM)

After nearly three years of political wrangling, the 27-nation EU has struck a deal on how to cope with the eight million migrants that have illegally entered European territory.

During their Thursday meeting in Luxembourg (5 June), EU interior ministers gave the go-ahead to a law - dubbed the return directive - establishing "common standards and procedures" for returning those non-EU nationals who do not or no longer fulfil the conditions for entry, stay or residence in a member state.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Get the EU news that really matters

Instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

"This is a real step forward," EU home affairs commissioner Jacques Barrot said after all critics of the proposal - Belgium, Greece, Malta and the Czech Republic - dropped their reservations.

Slovene interior minister Dragutin Mate, speaking on behalf of his country's EU presidency, expressed "confidence" that the European Parliament would back the law in an early, so-called first reading, approval on 18 June.

"All shadow rapporteurs [from the parliament's political groups] backed the compromise text yesterday," Mr Mate said, although he added that "every single vote will count in the end".

In the run up to Thursday's agreement, a number of issues were still causing controversy.

One of them is linked to the maximum period an migrant can be kept in detention after setting foot on the union's territory, with organisations active in asylum policy affairs previously describing systematic detentions as "inhumane and unwarranted".

The return directive approved by EU ministers says: "each member state shall set a limited period of detention, which may not exceed six months."

However, governments will be allowed to extend the six-month-period for an additional twelve months, but only in "very specific circumstances" such as lack of co-operation by a migrant or delays in obtaining necessary documentation from their home country.

Currently, the maximum detention period is decided by each government. For example, France has a 30-day limit on detention, while Malta has an 18-month maximum, and the UK imposes no limit.

According to Mr Barrot, the new legal setting will "improve" the situation for those waiting for expulsion, as there are currently nine EU countries with open-ended detention.

The return directive also caps the length of the entry ban after expulsion. It should not exceed five years unless a person "represents a serious threat to public policy, public security or to national security".

The very last stumbling bloc to the directive's approval came from a small group of countries including Cyprus, Greece, Lithuania, Malta and the Czech Republic, who complained that the obligation of "free legal assistance" would prove too costly.

In response, the European Commission committed itself to using the European Return Fund to help ease the financial burden.

EU Parliament set to sue EU Commission over Hungary funds

The European Parliament will likely take the European Commission to court for unblocking more than €10bn in funds for Hungary last December. A final nod of approval is still needed by European Parliament president, Roberta Metsola.

EU Commission clears Poland's access to up to €137bn EU funds

The European Commission has legally paved the way for Poland to access up to €137bn EU funds, following Donald Tusk's government's efforts to strengthen the independence of their judiciary and restore the rule of law in the country.

Opinion

Potential legal avenues to prosecute Navalny's killers

The UN could launch an independent international investigation into Navalny's killing, akin to investigation I conducted on Jamal Khashoggi's assassination, or on Navalny's Novichok poisoning, in my role as special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, writes the secretary-general of Amnesty International.

Opinion

I'll be honest — Moldova's judicial system isn't fit for EU

To state a plain truth: at present, Moldova does not have a justice system worthy of a EU member state; it is riven with corruption and lax and inconsistent standards, despite previous attempts at reform, writes Moldova's former justice minister.

Latest News

  1. Kenyan traders react angrily to proposed EU clothes ban
  2. Lawyer suing Frontex takes aim at 'antagonistic' judges
  3. Orban's Fidesz faces low-polling jitters ahead of EU election
  4. German bank freezes account of Jewish peace group
  5. EU Modernisation Fund: an open door for fossil gas in Romania
  6. 'Swiftly dial back' interest rates, ECB told
  7. Moscow's terror attack, security and Gaza
  8. Why UK-EU defence and security deal may be difficult

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic Food Systems Takeover at COP28
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersHow women and men are affected differently by climate policy
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersArtist Jessie Kleemann at Nordic pavilion during UN climate summit COP28
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP28: Gathering Nordic and global experts to put food and health on the agenda
  5. Friedrich Naumann FoundationPoems of Liberty – Call for Submission “Human Rights in Inhume War”: 250€ honorary fee for selected poems
  6. World BankWorld Bank report: How to create a future where the rewards of technology benefit all levels of society?

Join EUobserver

EU news that matters

Join us