14 ways to turn European visions upside down
By Lisbeth Kirk
The European integration process launched in the 50s has been a success, but its methods are today obsolete and outdated by their own success. This far-reaching conclusion is reached by the pro-European Paris based think tank Europe2020 and is presented today as "The first European political project developed by the generations born after the Treaty of Rome."
"Politically there is one institution too many, and there is no doubt that it is the Commission," the study says and proposes the college of Commissioners to be eliminated.
14 ways to turn European visions upside down
Join EUobserver today
Become an expert on Europe
Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.
Choose your plan
... or subscribe as a group
Already a member?
The project of the think-tank Europe 2020, in co-operation with the Newropeans network presents 14 concrete ways to throw the traditional European visions upside down: The old system can no longer handle the consequences of what it has brought to life, nor does it correspond to the world as it looks today and tomorrow, the study says. This obsolescence has been confirmed over a number of years with "multiple crises of the EU leading to a paralysis in EU decision-making on major subjects, a confusion of responsibilities, creating doubts and worries among citizens", the paper says.
The authors of the document "Vision Europe 2020 - Reinventing Europe 2005-2020" are convinced there are now only two possible choices for Europe: The one they present or an anti-democratic and xenophobic national-Europeanism leading to a certain “death of European integration as a historic project.”
From building to government
The Newropeans propose to turn from the building phase of the EU to a new age of democratic controlled government. "The administrations, the real "builders" of Europe in the last five decades, must now hand over the relay baton to the tandem of politicians and citizens," they say: "Europe no longer needs to be built, but rather to be governed effectively and democratically."
Relocation of EU institutions
The 14 points include a proposal to relocate European institutions, and break out of the Brussels - Luxembourg - Strasbourg historical axis: "The central institutions should be divided between London, Paris, Frankfurt, Brussels and The Hague (EuroRing 1) and the other community institutions between the other European capitals: Dublin, Madrid, Rome, Vienna, Budapest, Berlin, Prague, Warsaw, Copenhagen, Helsinki, Copenhagen, Athens, Lisbon, Stockholm, … (EuroRing 2)."
The Commission more or less superfluous
In line with a recent proposal, which has been supported by the larger EU governments except Germany, the study calls for a President of the European Government to be elected by heads of State or of Government. However, this president must be elected among the the heads of state in office at the national level and would thus have to offer this position in return for becoming the European President. A Minister of Common External Relations should be picked by the President from among the current Ministers of Foreign Affairs in office on the national level.
The study proposes to keep the system of 6 monthly rotating presidencies but only to assist the President. The Commission would be more or less superfluous as the European Parliament should have a complete right of legislative initiative, shared with the European Government and a new body should be created to take care of the administration.
The Newropeans demand the knowledge of at least one foreign language in order to be accepted as a candidate in European Parliamentarian elections, however the student based organisation does not indicate if they would like to introduce some sort of examination to test the skills of candidates.
Recommends 2-3 years delay of enlargement
The study calls for re-dynamising of the Council of Europe, which is not a EU institution but has most European countries as members. The Council of Europe should be the key actor of the “European Neighbourhood” and run relations with its neighbours "made up of very disparate types of countries: from Russia to Morocco." On enlargement the study recommends 2-3 years delay to permit the EU to make it self structurally and politically ready to receive new members and calls for the Copenhagen Summit to establish a real political calendar for enlargement, committing the heads of State and Governments of the EU, as well as the candidate countries before their public opinions.
European Democracy Marathon
The organisation Europe 2020 is based in Paris with Franck Biancheri, Director of Research and Strategy in the leading role as co-ordinator of the work. The group claims to represent the generations of younger Europeans less than 40 years old and managed to involve 82,000 students in the EU Student Vote initiative last month. A "European Democracy Marathon" is planned to start in September in Amsterdam to initiate discussions in 100 cities on the basis of the Vision Europe 2020 proposals. In July 2003, a new version including the commentaries of European citizens received during the debates as well as from the Internet will be published and widely distributed.