Saturday

1st Apr 2023

Infrastructure rules threaten alternative fuels bill

The debate in Brussels over how to develop viable alternatives to petrol and diesel boils down to a version of an age-old question: what comes first, the chicken or the egg?

The conundrum facing lawmakers is that motorists do not buy electric or gas powered vehicles for the simple reason that it is too inconvenient to charge or fill up their tank. Meanwhile, companies do not invest in new filling stations or charge points because there is not enough demand.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • Commission plans could see electric charge points and filling stations in Europe's most remote areas (Photo: EUobserver)

Resolving this question is one of the aims of the draft directive on alternative fuels currently being discussed by MEPs and ministers.

But the legislation is in danger of falling into the unwanted category of files that governments agree with in principle, but object to in practice.

The most contentious item relates to the requirement for minimum infrastructure targets.

Under the plan published by the EU executive in March, by 2020 the directive would require: hydrogen refuelling points every 300km, liquefied natural gas (LNG) filling stations every 400km; fuelling points for compressed natural gas (CNG) every 100km, and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) points every 150km.

Nearly all member states are worried that the bill could force them to push large sums of public investment into building an infrastructure network for which there is no market demand. They are also sceptical of the notion that building the network will inevitably lead to more customers using alternative fuels.

For his part, Carlos Fidanza, the Italian centre-right deputy charged with drafting parliament's position, wants to go further by adding targets for LPG and linking the infrastructure requirements to population.

Under his plan, one filling station for Hydrogen, LPG and CNG would be needed per 250,000, 150,000 and 100,000 people respectively.

Like the EU executive, MEPs say that the alternative fuels market, which accounts for less than 10 percent of transport fuels, cannot develop without infrastructure.

“If we want to give certainty to investors then we have to set binding targets at national level,” Fidanza said at a recent breakfast hearing with lobbyists and lawmakers, adding that “we are at the crucial point in the negotiations with council (member states)."

Fidanza added that he had chosen to go beyond the commission target for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and that the parliament's transport committee had agreed that “we need to establish an LPG network across the EU.”

Critics say that this 'one-size-fits-all' approach would result in filling stations being built in remote areas of Sweden and Finland where population density is amongst the lowest in the world. Meanwhile, gas and electricity provision would still be insufficient to cope with demand in cities.

Both the commission and parliament say that the plans are not intended to impose new costs on governments, arguing that private sector investment and EU cohesion funds should be able to cover the costs.

Financial incentives are needed to attract enough investment to take the strain from the public purse, argues Jeffrey Seisler.

Chief executive of Clean Fuel Consulting, a Washington DC and Brussels-based lobby group, Seisler also warns that the timeframe for implementation is “unrealistic and won't be met.”

A council official working on the file told this website that if the parliament continues to insist on binding targets, governments will “dig their own trenches” in opposition, dimming the prospects of a compromise.

Leaving the targets as drafted by the commission in the annex of the bill is “out of the question,” the official added, although a possible compromise could involve negotiating targets for each individual member state.

But with next May's European elections rapidly approaching, it is MEPs who are most anxious to get the directive on the statute books before the end of the legislative term.

The transport committee will adopt its negotiating position on the file in November. For their part, governments have only recently begun their discussions on the directive and are not expected to agree a negotiating mandate before mid-December.

It is this factor that could see the parliament blink first.

Dim prospects for EU energy tax reform

The logic behind a European Commission's proposal on energy taxation is based on the concept of "fuel neutrality" but it could hurt alternative fuels the most.

Police violence in rural French water demos sparks protests

Protests are planned in 90 villages across France on Thursday to protest against escalating police violence that have left 200 people injured, including two people who are still in a coma, after a violent clash in Sainte-Soline over 'water privatisation'.

EU approves 2035 phaseout of polluting cars and vans

The agreement will ban the sale of carbon-emitting cars after 2035. The EU Commission will present a proposal for e-fuels after pressure from German negotiators via a delegated act, which can still be rejected by the EU Parliament.

Opinion

Dear EU, the science is clear: burning wood for energy is bad

The EU and the bioenergy industry claim trees cut for energy will regrow, eventually removing extra CO2 from the atmosphere. But regrowth is not certain, and takes time, decades or longer. In the meantime, burning wood makes climate change worse.

Opinion

EU's new critical raw materials act could be a recipe for conflict

Solar panels, wind-turbines, electric vehicle batteries and other green technologies require minerals including aluminium, cobalt and lithium — which are mined in some of the most conflict-riven nations on earth, such as the Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea, and Kazakhstan.

Latest News

  1. EU to press South Korea on arming Ukraine
  2. Aid agencies clam up in Congo sex-for-work scandal
  3. Ukraine — what's been destroyed so far, and who pays?
  4. EU sending anti-coup mission to Moldova in May
  5. Firms will have to reveal and close gender pay-gap
  6. Why do 83% of Albanians want to leave Albania?
  7. Police violence in rural French water demos sparks protests
  8. Work insecurity: the high cost of ultra-fast grocery deliveries

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EFBWWEFBWW calls for the EC to stop exploitation in subcontracting chains
  2. InformaConnecting Expert Industry-Leaders, Top Suppliers, and Inquiring Buyers all in one space - visit Battery Show Europe.
  3. EFBWWEFBWW and FIEC do not agree to any exemptions to mandatory prior notifications in construction
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ways to prevent gender-based violence
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Economic gender equality now! Nordic ways to close the pension gap
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Pushing back the push-back - Nordic solutions to online gender-based violence

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us