Sunday

28th May 2023

Germany led EU's $5bn coal splurge

  • Coal is the most polluting of fossil fuels, yet governments still support the export of coal technologies. (Photo: AdamCohn)

A larger portion of EU taxpayers' money than previously thought was used in recent years as guarantee for the construction of coal-fired power plants.

According to a report by three environmental organisations, European governments supported their companies to export technology needed to construct coal plants with $5 billion (€4.6bn) in guarantees.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Another $1 billion was allocated as guarantees for related activities, like coal mining.

The guarantees were given via export credit agencies, government organisations which provide preferential loans or guarantees to help a country's company be more competitive.

Germany is the largest European provider of funds through its export credit agencies, with a total of $3.29 billion in funding for coal projects.

Meanwhile, coal is the most polluting of fossil fuels, partly responsible for increasing the earth's temperature.

The report, by Natural Resources Defense Council, Oil Change International, and World Wide Fund for Nature, comes a day before ministers meet in Paris to discuss climate-friendly investments.

The authors calculated that countries that belong to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), together with Russia and China, approved $73 billion in coal financing via public institutions between 2007 and 2014, with Japan ($20 billion) as the largest contributor.

Almost half of the global subsidies - $34 billion - was provided via export credit agencies.

Transparency

The figure is “likely an underestimate” because of the opaque nature of the agencies, and is far larger than what was known until now.

In a recently leaked document, seen by the authors and this website, the OECD itself set the figure of coal support via credit agencies at just under $14 billion, for a longer period (2003-2013).

The authors noted that the OECD was able to document only 41 percent of the coal projects that they found.

“Export Credit Agencies, which are the major actors in this space, are so secretive that even their official multilateral coordinating body, the OECD Export Credit Group, does not have access to adequate data”, they write.

The OECD secretariat would prefer more transparency, it appears from the leaked document, which was dated 4 March 2015. The text noted "there would seem to be a pressing need to issue coherent, complete and accurate figures on official export credit support that is relevant to climate change issues".

The NGO report also calculated how much greenhouse gas was emitted in each of the eight documented years of public financing of coal projects: 441 million metric tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent a year, roughly the yearly emission of Italy.

Downward trend?

There was a significant decrease in public finance of coal from 2013 to 2014, when the total figure the researchers calculated, went from $10 billion to $6 billion, but the authors noted that the drop does not automatically mean the start of a long-term trend.

“It is also possible that full information for 2014 projects has not yet been made publicly available yet since it is the most recent year”, the report said.

In recent years, some countries have announced they want to end financing coal projects with public money, including the US, France, the UK, and the Netherlands.

However, there is little known progress on OECD discussions for rules that would restrict support for coal.

On Wednesday (3 June) and Thursday, finance, economy, and foreign ministers from OECD countries will meet in Paris to talk about climate-friendly investments.

“The issue [of export credit support] is not specifically on the agenda of the Ministerial meeting, although there are break-out groups for discussions among ministers and it may be raised there”, a spokesperson for the OECD told this website via e-mail.

PFAS 'forever chemicals' cost society €16 trillion a year

Researchers found that global societal costs of the so-called forever chemicals or PFAS amount to €16 trillion per year. Meanwhile, the bigger producers of these chemicals are also among the ones spending the most to lobby EU policies.

EU: national energy price-spike measures should end this year

"If energy prices increase again and support cannot be fully discontinued, targeted policies to support vulnerable households and companies — rather than wide and less effective support policies — will remain crucial," the commission said in its assessment.

EU: national energy price-spike measures should end this year

"If energy prices increase again and support cannot be fully discontinued, targeted policies to support vulnerable households and companies — rather than wide and less effective support policies — will remain crucial," the commission said in its assessment.

Opinion

EU export credits insure decades of fossil-fuel in Mozambique

European governments are phasing out fossil fuels at home, but continuing their financial support for fossil mega-projects abroad. This is despite the EU agreeing last year to decarbonise export credits — insurance on risky non-EU projects provided with public money.

Latest News

  1. How the EU's money for waste went to waste in Lebanon
  2. EU criminal complicity in Libya needs recognition, says expert
  3. Europe's missing mails
  4. MEPs to urge block on Hungary taking EU presidency in 2024
  5. PFAS 'forever chemicals' cost society €16 trillion a year
  6. EU will 'react as appropriate' to Russian nukes in Belarus
  7. The EU needs to foster tech — not just regulate it
  8. EU: national energy price-spike measures should end this year

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. International Sustainable Finance CentreJoin CEE Sustainable Finance Summit, 15 – 19 May 2023, high-level event for finance & business
  2. ICLEISeven actionable measures to make food procurement in Europe more sustainable
  3. World BankWorld Bank Report Highlights Role of Human Development for a Successful Green Transition in Europe
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic summit to step up the fight against food loss and waste
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersThink-tank: Strengthen co-operation around tech giants’ influence in the Nordics
  6. EFBWWEFBWW calls for the EC to stop exploitation in subcontracting chains

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. InformaConnecting Expert Industry-Leaders, Top Suppliers, and Inquiring Buyers all in one space - visit Battery Show Europe.
  2. EFBWWEFBWW and FIEC do not agree to any exemptions to mandatory prior notifications in construction
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ways to prevent gender-based violence
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Economic gender equality now! Nordic ways to close the pension gap
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Pushing back the push-back - Nordic solutions to online gender-based violence
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: The Nordics are ready to push for gender equality

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us