2nd Oct 2023

Parliament wants tighter nano regulation

The European Parliament has called for the European Commission to tighten up how it deals with nanomaterials - materials less than a tenth of a micrometre in dimension, saying that while this cutting edge technology of the extremely small may promise great advances, there are also risks involved that European regulators must begin to consider.

On Friday (24 April), MEPs strongly backed a resolution 391 votes in favour, 3 against and 4 abstentions requesting that the EU executive evaluate the bloc's chemicals legislation - (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemical substances or ‘Reach') be reviewed to consider simplified registration for nanomaterials manufactured or imported below one tonne,

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The Reach legislation currently only applies to amounts above one tonne. But Swedish Green MEP Carl Schlyter, the author of the resolution, argues that given the minute scale of nanomaterials, a volume threshold of one tonne becomes meaningless.

The resolution also called on the commission to consider all nanomaterials as new substances and produce chemical safety reports with exposure assessments for them.

The deputies also want the commission to evaluate whether worker protection legislation needs to cover exposure of employees to nanomaterials.

Meanwhile, the nanotech and chemicals industries warned against possible legislative duplication and hinted that legislation or resolutions such as that of Mr Schlyter was not scientifically rigorous.

Reach for Life, a Brussels-based organisation formed last year by chemical manufacturers Albemarle, Chemtura, and ICL-IP to counter legislation it categorises as less based on sound science than on unsubstantiated scaremongering, said in response to the resolution that it "cautions against improper and conflicting legislation that could result in stunting a vital and burgeoning area for research in Europe."

Foundation Nanonet, which promotes the industry, echoed the message in a statement: "Science is crucial in protecting consumers and the environment which is sufficient reason to ensure that it is given proper consideration in the legislative process concerning nanotechnologies."

Mr Schlyter, who himself studied chemical engineering at the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm before becoming an MEP, told EUobserver that such a reaction was to be expected from industry-founded groups. "Far from not looking at the science of nanotechnology, it is the very lack of a strong body of scientific investigation into this very new realm that requires close scrutiny."

The European Consumers' Organisation (BEUC) however welcomed the MEPs' vote but went further and said that nanomaterials needed their own specific law covering the rapidly developing new field.

Nanofoods - Coming to a plate near you?

Chocolate that doesn't make you fat. Drinks designed by the press of a button. 'Meat' made from plant protein. Welcome to nanofoods - a brave new world that industry is keen to exploit. But will Europeans ever take to it?


Is the ECB sabotaging Europe's Green Deal?

The European Central Bank (ECB) recently raised interest rates to the highest point in the currency's 21-year existence — but the effects of its policies on renewables are badly understood.

IEA says: Go green now, save €11 trillion later

The International Energy Agency finds that the clean energy investment needed to stay below 1.5 degrees Celsius warming saves $12 trillion [€11.3 trillion] in fuel expenditure — and creates double the amount of jobs lost in fossil fuel-related industries.


Is the ECB sabotaging Europe's Green Deal?

The European Central Bank (ECB) recently raised interest rates to the highest point in the currency's 21-year existence — but the effects of its policies on renewables are badly understood.


How do you make embarrassing EU documents 'disappear'?

The EU Commission's new magic formula for avoiding scrutiny is simple. You declare the documents in question to be "short-lived correspondence for a preliminary exchange of views" and thus exempt them from being logged in the official inventory.

Latest News

  1. EU ministers go to Kyiv to downplay fears on US, Slovak aid
  2. Hoekstra faces tough questioning to be EU Green chief
  3. Frontex shared personal data of NGO staff with Europol six times
  4. Why EU Commission dumped Google's favourite consultant
  5. Slovak's 'illiberal' Fico victory boosts Orbán, but faces checks
  6. European Political Community and key media vote This WEEK
  7. Is the ECB sabotaging Europe's Green Deal?
  8. The realists vs idealists Brussels battle on Ukraine's EU accession

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region is stepping up its efforts to reduce food waste
  2. International Medical Devices Regulators Forum (IMDRF)Join regulators, industry & healthcare experts at the 24th IMDRF session, September 25-26, Berlin. Register by 20 Sept to join in person or online.
  3. UNOPSUNOPS begins works under EU-funded project to repair schools in Ukraine
  4. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsGeorgia effectively prevents sanctions evasion against Russia – confirm EU, UK, USA
  5. International Medical Devices Regulators Forum (IMDRF)Join regulators & industry experts at the 24th IMDRF session- Berlin September 25-26. Register early for discounted hotel rates
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersGlobal interest in the new Nordic Nutrition Recommendations – here are the speakers for the launch

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us