22nd Apr 2019


A parody of a proper citizens' initiative

In his article on Spain's referendum in EUobserver Mr Bruno Kaufman states: "At the same time, millions of Spanish voters said 'Si' to the new basic law of the Union, because of the introduction of the first transnational citizens' initiative, which gives one million people across the continent the right to propose a new European Law."

Mr Kaufman, whom I understand is a supporter of the proposed EU Constitution, is incorrect in saying that it gives a million citizens "the right to propose a new European law".

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

If some Spanish voters were under that impression in last Sunday's referendum, they were either misinformed or deluding themselves.

Article I-47 of the "Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe" provides for one million EU citizens to "invite" the European Commission "within the framework of its powers" to submit a proposal to the Council of Ministers for a particular EU law that "is required for the purpose of implementing the Constitution".

That is quite different from citizens being able to propose a new EU law.

Petitions can be ignored

This Article I-47 would bar the Commission from even considering any petition from citizens urging it to do something other than what it was already empowered to do - and which it should probably be doing anyway without the need for any petition.

If a million citizens did petition for an EU law, they could be ignored by the Commission, for the Constitution does not require the Commission to respond favourably to what they ask for.

If the Commission did respond favourably by proposing a law to the Council of Ministers - which is the only body the Commission can make such proposals to - the Council in turn could ignore or dismiss the Commission's proposal.

If the Council did not dismiss it, but legislated the EU law that was requested, it would be doing no more than what it should be doing anyway.

A parody of a proper citizens' initiative

This is a parody of a proper citizens' initiative. The EU Constitution does not give citizens the power to propose new European laws and it is mere propaganda to suggest otherwise.

The Constitution allows citizens to ask the Commission to ask the Council to make a law that it should be making anyway, if it were properly implementing the proposed Constitution.

This reference to a million citizens petitioning is a fig-leaf, mere window-dressing, designed to give a facade of democratic involvement to the profoundly undemocratic decision-making set-up in the EU, which the Constitution makes much worse than it is at present.

The Constitution would make democracy worse in the EU by abolishing the national veto on some 60 new policy areas or decisions - more than in the Nice and Amsterdam Treaties put together.

It would thereby give the EU Commission the monopoly in proposing laws in relation to these areas.

Conclave of technocrats

The Commission is an unelected body which France's President Charles de Gaulle once aptly described as "a conclave of technocrats without a country, responsible to nobody."

The Constitution would also increase greatly the power of the EU Council of Ministers - the 25-person oligarchy that has the main power to make EU laws for 450 million people - which is irremoveable and irresponsible as a group.

The EU Constitution would worsen, not alleviate, the EU's basic lack of democracy. In face of that overriding fact, only the ignorant or politically naive would take comfort from the reference in the proposed EU Constitution to this spurious and empty right of petition by one million citizens.

The author is a Senior Lecturer Emeritus in Social Policy of Trinity College in Dublin and Secretary of the Irish EU critical movement, National Platform.

Five Spanish Lessons for Europe

What are the lessons to be drawn from the first national referendum on a transnational constitution? Bruno Kaufmann draws attention to five in this comment.

How Brexit may harm the new EU parliament

British plans to - maybe - take part in EU elections risk legal chaos in the next European Parliament, which could be resolved only by treaty change - an unlikely prospect.

UK, France should join German Saudi arms embargo

Rather than blame Germany, France and the UK should follow its lead and join other European states that have stood up for human rights, and help spare embattled Yemeni civilians.

Press freedom and the EU elections

We are campaigning for the next European Commission to appoint a commissioner with a clear mandate to take on the challenge of the protection of freedom, independence and diversity of journalism.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank
  2. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  3. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  4. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  5. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  9. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  10. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic commitment to driving global gender equality
  12. International Partnership for Human RightsMeet your defender: Rasul Jafarov leading human rights defender from Azerbaijan

Latest News

  1. Romania drafts EU code on NGO migrant rescues
  2. Bulgaria, Hungary, and Malta shamed on press unfreedom
  3. EU drafts $20bn US sanctions list in aviation dispute
  4. Brunei defends stoning to death of gay men in EU letter
  5. US Democrats side with Ireland on Brexit
  6. Wifi or 5G to connect EU cars? MEPs weigh in
  7. How Brexit may harm the new EU parliament
  8. EU parliament backs whistleblower law

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNICEFUNICEF Hosts MEPs in Jordan Ahead of Brussels Conference on the Future of Syria
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic talks on parental leave at the UN
  3. International Partnership for Human RightsTrial of Chechen prisoner of conscience and human rights activist Oyub Titiev continues.
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic food policy inspires India to be a sustainable superpower
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersMilestone for Nordic-Baltic e-ID
  6. Counter BalanceEU bank urged to free itself from fossil fuels and take climate leadership
  7. Intercultural Dialogue PlatformRoundtable: Muslim Heresy and the Politics of Human Rights, Dr. Matthew J. Nelson
  8. Platform for Peace and JusticeTurkey suffering from the lack of the rule of law
  9. UNESDASoft Drinks Europe welcomes Tim Brett as its new president
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers take the lead in combatting climate change
  11. Counter BalanceEuropean Parliament takes incoherent steps on climate in future EU investments
  12. International Partnership For Human RightsKyrgyz authorities have to immediately release human rights defender Azimjon Askarov

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us