2nd Apr 2020


The net said no to patent directive

It reads like the storyline for "Asterix in the European Union". The joint lobbying armies of IBM, Microsoft, SAP, Intel, Siemens, Nokia, Philips, Ericsson, Alcatel and various patent offices couldn't push a controversial directive through against the stiff resistance of sparsely funded and formally untrained freedom fighters.

After a landslide vote (648-32) in the European Parliament's second reading, our camp of software patent critics rejoiced. The others resorted to spin-doctoring.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or join as a group

  • I never planned on becoming a campaigner or lobbyist (Photo: Florian Mueller)

For me, this outcome marks the unexpected happy end of an unexpected involvement.

In April of last year, I first went to the European Parliament to attend a conference on software patents. I never planned on becoming a campaigner or lobbyist.

I got drawn into it for one reason: I always want to know that if I independently create a piece of software, I will surely be entitled to sell it.

The way the patent system works, that ownership (which most professions take for granted) is not guaranteed.

You can spend years on a project, but if somebody previously registered some key functionality at the patent office, then it does not count that you have actually not stolen anything. You are at the mercy of the patent holder, period.

For some industries, that undeserved injustice may be the exception, and the protection of the inventor against plagiarism may be the rule.

It takes a lot to understand why, but my comrades-in-arms and I are convinced that software patents are very negative on the bottom line.

Not only to us, but to the entire economy and society except for a few people and companies. Based on that firm belief, many colleagues of mine became politically active for the first time.

Approachable politicians

After I got involved, I found politicians to be far more approachable than I would have thought. That was the single most encouraging experience.

Two months after that conference in Brussels, I had the opportunity to make a statement to Germany's minister of justice. So I wanted to walk through more of those open doors and deliver our message.

There were some disappointments, too.

Unfortunately, various politicians confirmed that prejudice of untruthfulness.

I am still angry that the European Commission and most member state governments consistently denied that the proposed directive would have allowed for software patents. They designed the directive from the ground up in such a way as to disguise its actual intention.

When I first read the text of the directive, I thought it was reasonable. After learning more about the subject, I realised that it was a "Patent-kin Village".

Most politicians and journalists were misled the same way that I originally was, and if those didn't take the time to understand it, then it was the word of the commission and the European Council against mine.

That was a real annoyance until SAP - a pure software company - advertised its endorsement of the council's common position. Dankeschön!


Another behaviour I couldn't understand was that of many companies which would have been affected by the directive, at least potentially.

Some fairly small companies went to extreme lengths in supporting the FFII (an NGO that opposes software patents), but I thought (and still feel) that medium-sized companies with tens or hundreds of millions of revenues should, with maybe two or three exceptions, have committed much more funding.

It beats me why the owners and CEOs of most of those companies decided to leave their defence entirely to idealists, while the pro-patent lobby afforded high-profile individuals and glitzy events.

It seems so logical to me that there is far higher leverage in influencing a political decision than in dealing with individual lawsuits that could hit you later on.

The political line of defence comes without guarantees, but it's the same with litigation and still a company would seriously defend itself in court. The difference is just that the EU doesn't send a formal notice to potentially affected companies that they are on trial and must appoint a defender.

The net said no

Still our side was ultimately able to win. David had a slingshot when he fought Goliath, the Gauls had the magic potion to beat the Romans to a pulp in the Asterix books, and we had the internet.

With the same resource disadvantage ten years ago, we would not have had a prayer.

However, we had a medium available that enabled us to mobilise a large number of citizens who contacted their elected representatives. Our resistance movement had one huge network that connected people all throughout and beyond the EU via websites, wikis, mailing lists, and IRC chats.

Some IT giants may have dwarfed our financial resources, but on the internet, we outclassed them by an even greater factor.

You can find out for yourself how many links to a certain website have been indexed by Google (e.g. by searching for

As I am writing these lines, EICTA's website has 11 external referrals, Microsoft-sponsored has 20.

In contrast, has more than 6,000, and has so many that modesty forbids my mentioning the number.

The net said no to the proposed directive. That is why so many citizens contacted their MEPs. Ultimately, many parliamentarians put the concerns of their voters above the propaganda of lobbyists."

Good old democracy with a new platform.

The author founded the campaign last year. You can reach him at


The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Parliament should pass resolution on software patents

If Europe does not send a signal to the rest of the world, then the US government might just have its way, writes IP campaigner Florian Müller calling on MEPs to express their majority will on software patentability.

A coronavirus 'Marshall Plan' alone won't be nearly enough

The 1948-51Marshall Plan provided about €118bn in today's figures in American assistance to European countries. These numbers are dwarfed by prospective needs, and the needs are not just European or American - but global.


Trying to think straight about coronavirus

Clear-headed thinking becomes nearly impossible under this relentless barrage of bad news and apocalyptic analysis, Ferraris writes - a state of mind he describes as "cogito interruptus".

Pandemic is time to recognise gig workers' rights

Millions of gig economy workers have been left abandoned by companies during the coronavirus outbreak. Workers have complained that gloves, masks, or gel have not been made available.

News in Brief

  1. Danish conservatives want Orban party kicked out of EPP
  2. Dutch finance minister repents on virus help
  3. France to house domestic violence victims in hotels
  4. Europe sends medical goods to Iran, despite US embargo
  5. Commission sets consultation on raising 2030 climate target
  6. 12-year old Belgian girl dies of coronavirus
  7. EU commission: no 'indefinite' emergency measures
  8. Denmark plans 'gradual' return to normal after Easter


Only democracy can fight epidemics

As Li Wenliang, the deceased Chinese doctor who was reprimanded for reporting on the virus, said: "There should be more openness and transparency".

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking Europe’s Economy Circular – the time is now
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersScottish parliament seeks closer collaboration with the Nordic Council
  3. UNESDAFrom Linear to Circular – check out UNESDA's new blog
  4. Nordic Council of Ministers40 years of experience have proven its point: Sustainable financing actually works
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ministers paving the way for 5G in the region
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersEarmarked paternity leave – an effective way to change norms

Latest News

  1. Without European patriotism, EU decline is inevitable
  2. EU cancels April Fool's 'fake news'
  3. A coronavirus 'Marshall Plan' alone won't be nearly enough
  4. Trying to think straight about coronavirus
  5. Berlin ready to airlift Greek island refugees
  6. Von der Leyen criticises Hungary, but fails to mention it
  7. Air pollution drops in Europe, but how long will it last?
  8. Human rights abusers don't stop for virus, MEPs tell EU

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us