Friday

10th Apr 2020

Opinion

EU citizen consultation as necessary as ever

We are glad to see that the European Citizens Consultations attracted your attention. Your commentary, "Why it may not be right to consult the people", demonstrated clearly that a discussion on involving citizens in EU policy-making is as necessary as ever.

Your objection to involving lay citizens in a debate about the future of Europe seems to be that it is a waste of money and politically undesirable. Let us deal with the desirability issue first.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

For many years, we have seen more and more people shy away from traditional modes of political participation. At the same, though, research reveals that they do want to participate – just not in the traditional way.

Studies show that protests, petitions and elite-challenging participation of all kinds are increasing. But this kind of participation is often very skewed both socially and politically: those who are more educated, who have more resources and who also hold more extreme views tend to engage in those forms of participation more than others.

However, policy-makers do need to be provided with information about people's concerns and preferences in order to formulate policies which respond to their interests.

What we need therefore is a way for people to articulate their interests beyond the traditional methods which allows everyone - from all walks of life and from all countries - to speak their minds.

Initiatives that people trust

We need initiatives that people trust; initiatives brewed in civil society. We need to overcome interaction problems between ordinary Europeans of different languages and cultural background which they tend to face when they try to make their voice heard.

Initiatives like the European Citizens' Consultations provide a forum for citizens to exchange ideas, to express their concerns and to make their voices heard. They give a significant number of citizens the opportunity to share the experience of people like 63-year-old Berlin pensioner Günter Langanke, who took part in the German national consultation and said afterwards: "I learned a lot about democracy and participation. Everyone could voice their opinion and all voices were heard. I have never experienced something like this."

This does not mean that citizen participation projects aim to become a form of 'ersatz' democracy. They reinforce democracy by going back to the citizens and consulting them.

Citizens' participation fosters active citizenship. This is the basis of any well-functioning party or representative democracy – not a competitor to it - and active citizenship means more than going to the ballot box once every four years, more than being the recipient of advertisements and brochures explaining the work of the EU's institutions and outlining its achievements and goals. It means being able to share and discuss one's views with fellow citizens all over Europe.

Waste of time and money?

You go on to predict that this largest ever deliberation on the future of Europe among lay citizens will prove useless, a waste of time and money. The evidence of the events held so far contradicts this.

The European Commission and 20 European foundations are supporting this project. Has their money been invested badly? We do not think so.

The primary objective of the European Citizens Consultations is to provide to EU policy-makers a new source of information. The outcomes go far beyond what opinion polls can provide, and they are much more than individual wish lists: They are the result of people listening to each other and respecting each other's point of view across boundaries of education, geography and language. This is information of the kind which has been mostly unavailable in Europe so far.

Moreover, the European Citizens Consultations raise awareness among policy-makers, stakeholders and the wider public of the value of involving more than just the usual suspects in the debate about how Europe should develop.

The media response to the launch event last October and to the national consultations - including TV coverage, radio interviews, press articles and comments like yours - shows that we are well on our way to achieving this goal.

A final remark: citizens' participation is not only necessary and therefore a good investment. The European Citizens' Consultations are also demonstrating that dialogue among lay people about a shared European future is entirely feasible – rebutting the all too convenient and lazy cynicism of those who argue citizens are unmotivated, incompetent and generally unable to join in the debate.

Active and competent citizens are essential to any democracy. This was one of the key lessons of the events of May 2005.

Gerrit Rauws is director of the King Baudouin Foundation, Felix Oldenburg is head of new governance at the Institut für Organisationskommunikation, IFOK

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Why it may not be right to consult the people

Money now being spent on consulting European citizens would be far better spent in assisting the development and policy of pan-European political parties, writes Peter Sain ley Berry

Why Europe must act now, and on a big scale

It is still very likely that Europe will face a new deadly spread of the virus next autumn or winter. Until a reliable vaccine and cure are in place, we all have to live in this new reality.

Coronavirus sees approval-rating soar for EU leaders

The rise in support for mainstream parties has been paired with stagnation or decline for far-right populist parties and figures - the AfD has dropped to 10 percent in Germany and Marine Le Pen and Matteo Salvini are treading water.

The future of 'Made in China' after coronavirus?

In repointing Europe's approach to industrial policy, some policymakers have prized China as an example to follow. Luckily, the European Commission is moving towards a European approach.

Coronavirus: A test of the West

We are experiencing the first global pandemic unfolding in the 24/7 news cycle and taking its toll, in real time, on our daily lives, our financial security and the global economy.

News in Brief

  1. Migrants trapped on boat in Tripoli due to shelling
  2. EU anti-crisis budget 'could be up to €1.5 trillion'
  3. Western Balkan states appeal for EU help with masks
  4. Spain's lockdown could be extended until 10 May
  5. IMF: Pandemic crisis will be worse than great depression
  6. German economy minister expects progress on EU deal
  7. Italian PM: EU is at risk if no deal on recovery plan
  8. Belgian region to block EU Green Deal

Coronavirus: A test of the West

We are experiencing the first global pandemic unfolding in the 24/7 news cycle and taking its toll, in real time, on our daily lives, our financial security and the global economy.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking Europe’s Economy Circular – the time is now
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersScottish parliament seeks closer collaboration with the Nordic Council
  3. UNESDAFrom Linear to Circular – check out UNESDA's new blog
  4. Nordic Council of Ministers40 years of experience have proven its point: Sustainable financing actually works
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ministers paving the way for 5G in the region
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersEarmarked paternity leave – an effective way to change norms

Latest News

  1. How the EU's virus-alert agency failed
  2. Flemish nationalists torpedo Belgium Green Deal pledge
  3. Eurozone agreed €500bn cushion against virus blow
  4. Why Europe must act now, and on a big scale
  5. EU court blocks Poland's bid to 'frighten' judges
  6. Coronavirus sees approval-rating soar for EU leaders
  7. EU science chief who 'quit' had been told to resign
  8. EU delays 'exit strategies' plan, as WHO urges caution

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us