Tuesday

19th Feb 2019

Opinion

Real democracy: real communications

People have been complaining about the European Union's communications for as long as I have been writing about Europe. Indeed, they have probably complained for a lot longer than that. The public also complains about a democratic deficit - something that the new constitutional arrangements currently being finalised were supposed to address - but which, of course, they don't, or at least not to any meaningful degree.

Sometimes this lack of democracy is perceived as a lack of communication, both by the public and by the European Commission. And so the Commission responds to people saying, 'We want our opinions counted,' (democracy) by answering, 'We shall listen better' (communication). The two are not quite the same thing.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

  • "You cannot have democracy only when it doesn't hurt" (Photo: Peter Sain ley Berry)

These are some of the problems that must cause Mrs Margot Wallström, the Commissioner in charge of communications strategy, to toss and turn at nights. She is someone who believes strongly in democracy but has to work within a system that is not at all as democratic as it might be.

Earlier this month she unveiled her latest proposals to overhaul the strategy entitled 'Communicating Europe in Partnership.' Behind them lies a sentiment that she expressed in a speech to the Economic and Social Committee at the end of last month.

"European democracy," she said, "And European communications policy are not about 'getting the people on board.' It's about putting them in the driving seat."

The new proposals build on various initiatives taken during the 'pause for reflection' that followed the negative French and Dutch referenda in 2005. They propose stimulating a wide variety of opportunities for folk to become involved in debate and discussion - preferably transnational. The internet facilitates such opportunities, of course, through websites, blogs, e-polling, discussion forums and the rest. All will be promoted through the communications strategy.

Whether this actually puts people in the driving seat we shall have to wait and see. Cynics might suggest it was more putting them in the back of the bus from where a whisper or two might emerge over the sound of the engine.

Implicitly, however, Mrs Wallström has recognised two things. First, that communication is a two way process. Secondly, that the demand for communication - that is for political debate - is not the same as the desire for communication in the form of education or information - how the Union's institutions work, for instance, or what activities might qualify for a helping of the Union's largesse.

But she has not made this distinction explicit and without this there is a danger of education and politics becoming intertwined. Certainly this is the fear of many in Britain who sadly view even the most straightforward account of how the European Council works, or the number of members in the European Parliament, as propaganda.

In France, where they do these things rather differently, I remember watching an excellent series of short public announcements in the run-up to the last French Presidency explaining how the European institutions functioned.

I really do not see how even the most diehard eurosceptic can believe this to be propaganda. If you want to change, or even abolish something, it is surely helpful to know how it is supposed to work. Nevertheless, it would be useful to make the distinction clearer between educational facts and political opinions as to the Union's usefulness or purpose.

This kind of educational communication has to be the job of member states and Mrs Wallström is right to insist that it be so. Here's where the 'partnership' comes in - not just the Commission, but member states and civil society as well. The better informed the public, the more intelligent the argument is likely to be on the political side.

Her proposals envisage such folk urgently debating the issues in varied political forums promoted by a range of organisations supported or encouraged by the Commission. Greater interest generated here will translate into a better turnout for European Parliamentary elections, or so the theory has it.

But sadly, it is at this point that we start to become unstuck. Let us take one obvious issue as an illustration - the Strasbourg seat for the European Parliament - something that Mrs Wallström herself has told us she feels should be scrapped - and of which the European public are overwhelmingly in favour of getting rid.

The citizens have been engaged; it is an issue in which they have an entirely legitimate interest seeing as they pay for it. They have made their views known - but is anyone going to take the slightest notice? No.

The problem is that you cannot have democracy only when it doesn't hurt. And this is the Commission's problem and the Council's problem. It is no use their saying we want to involve citizens, but then adding - sotto voce - only for so long as the consensus they generate causes no ripples. . That only produces cynicism and disengagement.

The public does have an issue - a major issue - which is how to control the European executive? How do we stop the train, or divert the train - or even make the train go faster, if the European executive is unelected?

In a passage in her speech announcing the communications proposals, Mrs Wallström blames the result of the 2005 French referendum on a failure to communicate adequately the benefits of enlargement. For this she blames the French government.

There may be an element of truth in this - but if so it is a small element. More important is surely the element of truth that said - 'Hold on! Our little Europe has just doubled in size and now you propose enlarging it further without a chance to consider the implications or to have a vote on alternatives.'

It is on this big issue of how Europe is run that the public wants its say. And not simply by discussion in a blog or internet forum. The issue is democracy itself. And it is not a question of whether the Commission 'listens' - or even that the Council 'listens' - it is a question of whether the electors can throw the executive out altogether if they don't listen. Once we have real democracy, we shall no longer need communications strategies.

EU's chance to step up on Hungary and Poland

Viktor Orban of Hungary and Poland's Jaroslaw Kaczynski seem to share the idea that the rights of some may come at the expense of the rights of others, and public institutions should serve the majority, and not all citizens.

Could Finnish presidency fix labour-chain abuse?

There can be no more excuses for business. They will be held for responsible for their failure to take action to prevent the risk of human and labour rights through their supply chains.

Brexit vs Grexit: The six stages of losing to the EU

Theresa May's venture seems very similar to the attempt by Alexis Tsipras in 2015 to persuade Brussels to accept his terms for the bail out - a huge negotiation failure, presented to the public as the best possible deal.

Why Brussels' toxic lobbying culture must end

What is revelatory about the study by Corporate Europe Observatory is the sheer number of embassies, committees and advisory groups that lobbyists can target: from the Council all the way down to standing committee on plants, animals, food and feed.

Why a far-right surge won't change EU migration policy

The right-wing Eurosceptic Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy (EFDD), Europe of Nations and Freedom (ENF), and European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) groups hold 151 out of 751 seats - even large gains are unlikely to give them a majority.

News in Brief

  1. Visegrad countries meeting with Israel called off
  2. EU ministers call climate change 'direct and existential threat'
  3. Seven MPs leave Britain's Labour Party
  4. Czech PM: May's EU elections 'most important ever'
  5. 'History will judge us': May tells MPs on Brexit
  6. Trump warns EU on release of Islamist fighters
  7. Venezuela expels 'conspiratorial' MEPs
  8. Holocaust dispute upsets Israel's EU lobbying

What does Poland want from the EU?

We propose several changes to the EU, derived from the political philosophy behind the current Polish government, and what Poles expect from the EU - this could be seen as a manifesto Poland wants the next European Commission to tackle.

Migration and May elections - time to get facts right

If misinformation in the field of migration can bring a government down, as in the recent case of Belgium following the country's adoption of the UN migration pact, then it can doubtless produce a populist majority in the European parliament.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersMilestone for Nordic-Baltic e-ID
  2. Counter BalanceEU bank urged to free itself from fossil fuels and take climate leadership
  3. Intercultural Dialogue PlatformRoundtable: Muslim Heresy and the Politics of Human Rights, Dr. Matthew J. Nelson
  4. Platform for Peace and JusticeTurkey suffering from the lack of the rule of law
  5. UNESDASoft Drinks Europe welcomes Tim Brett as its new president
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers take the lead in combatting climate change
  7. Counter BalanceEuropean Parliament takes incoherent steps on climate in future EU investments
  8. International Partnership For Human RightsKyrgyz authorities have to immediately release human rights defender Azimjon Askarov
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersSeminar on disability and user involvement
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersInternational appetite for Nordic food policies
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Nordic Innovation House in Hong Kong
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region has chance to become world leader when it comes to start-ups

Latest News

  1. Italian populists could be second biggest force in EU parliament
  2. Merkel defends Russia ties, ridicules Trump on cars
  3. British MPs condemn Facebook CEO's misrule
  4. EU's chance to step up on Hungary and Poland
  5. ESA pushback against new EU space agency plan
  6. Sluggish procedure against Hungary back on table
  7. Could Finnish presidency fix labour-chain abuse?
  8. Brexit and trip to Egypt for Arab League This WEEK

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersTheresa May: “We will not be turning our backs on the Nordic region”
  2. International Partnership for Human RightsOpen letter to Emmanuel Macron ahead of Uzbek president's visit
  3. International Partnership for Human RightsRaising key human rights concerns during visit of Turkmenistan's foreign minister
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersState of the Nordic Region presented in Brussels
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersThe vital bioeconomy. New issue of “Sustainable Growth the Nordic Way” out now
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic gender effect goes international
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersPaula Lehtomaki from Finland elected as the Council's first female Secretary General
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic design sets the stage at COP24, running a competition for sustainable chairs
  9. Counter BalanceIn Kenya, a motorway funded by the European Investment Bank runs over roadside dwellers
  10. ACCACompany Law Package: Making the Best of Digital and Cross Border Mobility,
  11. International Partnership for Human RightsCivil Society Worried About Shortcomings in EU-Kyrgyzstan Human Rights Dialogue
  12. UNESDAThe European Soft Drinks Industry Supports over 1.7 Million Jobs

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Mission of China to the EUJointly Building Belt and Road Initiative Leads to a Better Future for All
  2. International Partnership for Human RightsCivil society asks PACE to appoint Rapporteur to probe issue of political prisoners in Azerbaijan
  3. ACCASocial Mobility – How Can We Increase Opportunities Through Training and Education?
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersEnergy Solutions for a Greener Tomorrow
  5. UNICEFWhat Kind of Europe Do Children Want? Unicef & Eurochild Launch Survey on the Europe Kids Want
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Countries Take a Stand for Climate-Smart Energy Solutions
  7. Mission of China to the EUChina: Work Together for a Better Globalisation
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNordics Could Be First Carbon-Negative Region in World
  9. European Federation of Allergy and AirwaysLife Is Possible for Patients with Severe Asthma
  10. PKEE - Polish Energy AssociationCommon-Sense Approach Needed for EU Energy Reform
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region to Lead in Developing and Rolling Out 5G Network
  12. Mission of China to the EUChina-EU Economic and Trade Relations Enjoy a Bright Future

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us