Monday

20th May 2019

Opinion

How Europarl TV develops will be the test

There can be few people, interested in the European Union and its affairs, who have not noticed that we are now in the era of EuroparlTV - launched on Wednesday of this week.

This is the European Parliament's own TV station, transmitting, via the internet, on four channels catering respectively for EU watchers, the general public, young people and those in all these categories who wish, and importantly have the time, to follow the Parliament's deliberations as they happen.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

  • Parliament's 'Pravda' - or more communication with the citizens? (Photo: European Parliament)

It is a brave attempt at improving our knowledge of what goes on; at 'communicating with the citizen,' as the jargon has it, though whether the ordinary citizen is actually truly interested in being communicated with is another matter.

Therein lies a paradox; many people readily complain that they know next to nothing about Europe and profess themselves eager for knowledge.

Yet point them in the direction of the large volume of material that already exists and they turn grey with indifference - a prelude to remembering a sudden and urgent errand.

Voting in European elections

In this context EuroparlTV's justification - responding to the right of all citizens to know and understand what is happening in their elected institutions - seems a rather one-sided contract.

Of all the rights that citizens want to see implemented, this one must figure rather low down on the list, though it is, for obvious reasons not least to do with the public's apathy when it comes for voting in European elections, rather high on the Parliament's list.

Nevertheless, I do not want to strike a negative tone.

I would far rather see EuroparlTV up and running than not, even if, at a cost of some 40 million euro over four years, the call on the public purse is by no means insignificant. It is clear much thoughtful work has gone into the project, even if on its first day I found a number of glitches and the website caused my browser to crash repeatedly in a fury of frustration.

Such teething problems will no doubt be resolved shortly and those who are interested in European affairs, or who explain them to others, will find the station a useful reference.

Though whether it will ever reach an audience of 20-40 million for 'hot debates' as forecast by Mr Alejo Vida-Quadrass, the Parliament's Vice-President for Information and Communication Policy, must be moot.

Take out the old and young, the sick, absent and those who take no interest in politics whatsoever and we must be talking there of about one in ten of the European population. I am not sure you would even get that audience for a football match.

His Master's Voice

There are, however, two rather more important points to make about the project. The first concerns EuroparlTV's independence - or rather its lack thereof.

For this is a parliamentary venture, paid for and supervised by the parliament itself. Yes, journalists working for the station will have a certain amount of freedom and there are guidelines to ensure that all strands of elected opinion will be fairly reflected - but at the end of the day EuroparlTV will be ‘His Master's Voice.'

Does this matter? Yes, I think it does. And fundamentally. Just as we Europeans have fought to separate the judiciary from the legislature (though we might look again at the position of the European Court of Justice), so we should be in the business of separating the Fourth Estate from the organs of democracy and government. It is a principle of governance that should be respected.

It is all very well to say that EuroparlTV will not be under the Parliament's day to day thumb - and indeed to mean it - but I question whether this can really be so.

People have jobs to protect, companies have contracts to win or renew. Whenever a conflict arises between a public interest story and embarrassment to an institution, the temptation will always be to soft pedal and for editors to compromise to the advantage of their paymasters.

How would EuroparlTV, for instance, have run the story earlier this year about the report on MEPs' expense irregularities? If you remember, Parliament suppressed that report and swore those who had seen it to secrecy. Had a copy been leaked to EuroparlTV, would they have had the courage to publish it? Almost certainly not.

There will always be potential conflict between the public interest and public institutions. In this case Parliament has chosen to run its own TV station; it didn't have to. One of EuroparlTV's objectives is to contribute to the development of a ‘European Public Space' - where European stories are debated transnationally across a range of media.

This objective would almost certainly have been better served by the creation of a European Public Service Media Trust with a guaranteed income removed from the control of the institutions it served.

This could then channel money to media outlets for purposes such as making programmes about the European Parliament. Organisations representing radio, television, the written word would then compete for funds according to the quality of their output and the audiences they attracted.

An hour a day

Were EuroparlTV funded thus it would remove the charge that it was merely Parliament's ‘Pravda.' And if journalists felt that their purposes might be served by showing MEPs asleep or picking their noses, then they need not mind the wrath of those offended. The strongest democracies are those with the most vicious satires.

Besides assisting a plural media, an independent funding mechanism would also remove another of EuroparlTV's current limitations - namely, that if citizens want to know about anything, then it is Europe in the round that they want to know about and not just that part of the European political agglomeration represented by the Parliament.

It would make more sense (and help to fill the hours of necessary programming) for the station to cover all European institutions and all European news.

This need not compromise the amount of Parliamentary programming: EuroparlTV only envisages some 300 hours of new programmes a year - less than an hour a day.

Moreover, covering the Commission, the Council, the Courts as well as European news would do far more to develop the European Public Space than a parliamentary channel alone.

Of course, there are recognised tensions between the European institutions but the duty to citizens - indeed to the European construction itself - should surely provide sufficient cause to override them. We shall see how EuroparlTV develops.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Google to launch European Parliament election service

Google News is to launch a special service covering the European Parliament elections next June. The service will be modelled on a similar section developed for the upcoming US presidential and congressional elections.

Europe's far-right - united in diversity?

Europe's far-right is set to rise in the next European Parliament election. This vote will not yet allow the populists to build a majority. But it may become another milestone in their process of changing European politics.

The ECB Song Contest?

One can't help feeling that the race to succeed Mario Draghi as president of the European Central Bank has taken on the flavor of the upcoming final round of the Eurovision Song Contest.

EU must hold Qatar to account for World Cup deaths

The EU has a unique opportunity to push its labour rights agenda in the Gulf state, with the tournament throwing the country's dismal record on migrant workers firmly into the spotlight.

News in Brief

  1. Sweden Democrat MEP ousted for revealing sex harassment
  2. 80% of Erasmus students find job within three months
  3. September elections in Austria after Strache scandal
  4. Swiss voters approve tighter gun controls in line with EU
  5. Report: May's fourth Brexit vote a 'retread' of old ideas
  6. Turkey insists on right to drill for oil off Cyprus coast
  7. Anti-Salvini banners become new trend in Italy
  8. EU flies rainbow flag on anti-homophobia day

Press freedom and the EU elections

We are campaigning for the next European Commission to appoint a commissioner with a clear mandate to take on the challenge of the protection of freedom, independence and diversity of journalism.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Vote for the EU Sutainable Energy AwardsCast your vote for your favourite EUSEW Award finalist. You choose the winner of 2019 Citizen’s Award.
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersEducation gets refugees into work
  3. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank
  4. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  5. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  6. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  7. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  11. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  12. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic commitment to driving global gender equality
  2. International Partnership for Human RightsMeet your defender: Rasul Jafarov leading human rights defender from Azerbaijan
  3. UNICEFUNICEF Hosts MEPs in Jordan Ahead of Brussels Conference on the Future of Syria
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic talks on parental leave at the UN
  5. International Partnership for Human RightsTrial of Chechen prisoner of conscience and human rights activist Oyub Titiev continues.
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic food policy inspires India to be a sustainable superpower
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersMilestone for Nordic-Baltic e-ID
  8. Counter BalanceEU bank urged to free itself from fossil fuels and take climate leadership
  9. Intercultural Dialogue PlatformRoundtable: Muslim Heresy and the Politics of Human Rights, Dr. Matthew J. Nelson
  10. Platform for Peace and JusticeTurkey suffering from the lack of the rule of law
  11. UNESDASoft Drinks Europe welcomes Tim Brett as its new president
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers take the lead in combatting climate change

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Counter BalanceEuropean Parliament takes incoherent steps on climate in future EU investments
  2. International Partnership For Human RightsKyrgyz authorities have to immediately release human rights defender Azimjon Askarov
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersSeminar on disability and user involvement
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersInternational appetite for Nordic food policies
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Nordic Innovation House in Hong Kong
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region has chance to become world leader when it comes to start-ups
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersTheresa May: “We will not be turning our backs on the Nordic region”
  8. International Partnership for Human RightsOpen letter to Emmanuel Macron ahead of Uzbek president's visit
  9. International Partnership for Human RightsRaising key human rights concerns during visit of Turkmenistan's foreign minister
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersState of the Nordic Region presented in Brussels
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersThe vital bioeconomy. New issue of “Sustainable Growth the Nordic Way” out now
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic gender effect goes international

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us