12th Aug 2020


Right to privacy at risk in anti-piracy talks

  • The talks could end in customs officials checking the contents of laptops (Photo: European Commission)

Since last spring,‭ ‬The European Union,‭ ‬the United States,‭ ‬Canada,‭ ‬Switzerland and Japan have been‭ negotiating a new anti-online piracy treaty‭ ‬-‭ ‬the so called ACTA treaty. The process is characterised by extreme secrecy,‭ ‬and even though the negotiations could result in new,‭ harsh‬ file-sharing laws in member states it's impossible for the media and for the public to participate in the discussion.‭

Protests from organizations and IT businesses have been ignored by the EU.‭ ‬Any member state that believes in openness should protest and demand that the European Commission makes public which new anti-file-sharing laws they are pushing for with a European mandate.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

ACTA negotiations are founded on a belief that stronger enforcement of intellectual property rights would benefit the economy.‭ ‬This presumption‭ ‬-‭ widespread ‬in the political establishment‭ ‬-‭ ‬is highly controversial.‭ ‬Studies from Harvard and from The Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm conclude that there is no clear connection between on-line piracy and the sales of copyrighted works.‭ ‬

The fair-use industry‭ ‬-‭ ‬businesses taking advantage of the fair-use exemptions from the copyright law as Google does when indexing the web‭ ‬-‭ ‬contributes more to the economy than do copyright-dependent industries.‭ ACTA negotiators, however,‭ ‬working closely with the copyright industry,‭ ‬are not likely to take such facts into account.

Secret information believed to have leaked from the ACTA negotiations has caused speculation about the purpose of the ACTA initiative.‭ ‬Canadian newspapers reported that Internet Service Providers may be forced to give up information about their customers,‭ ‬which would compromise internet users‭' ‬privacy protection.‭ ‬The treaty could also make a criminal out of anyone who facilitates copyright infringments,‭ ‬for instance by developing effective copying tools.‭ ‬

Such regulations would inhibit technical innovation in Europe and strike a hard blow against the IT sector.‭ ‬Most eye-popping are press reports claiming that customs officials could get the authority to search travelers‭' ‬mp3‭ -players and laptop computers to identify unlawfully copied material.‭ ‬If this is correct,‭ ‬it is yet another example of how the political elite's campaign against file sharing is resulting in an increasingly intrusive control state.

Which fears are unfounded and which fears are to be taken seriously we don't know,‭ ‬as a result of the secrecy surrounding the talks.‭ ‬Neither the public nor elected representatives know what government officials and lobbyists will agree on behind closed doors. Unfortunately, some elected representatives don't even want to scrutinise the treaty. As recently as last week, the European Parliament rejected a motion to demand relevant information from the European Commission.

The public being prevented from examining an agreement that could change our law is inconsistent with the openness that we are used to in the legislative process.‭ ‬From a democratic perspective,‭ ‬the secret ACTA negotiations are unacceptable.‭ ‬EU member states are represented by the commission,‭ ‬which got this mandate to negotiate from the Agriculture and Fisheries Council - a meeting of EU agriculture ministers.‭ ‬

The decision in the Agriculture and Fisheries Council was taken without debate,‭ ‬and the ministers most likely had no idea what they were deciding.‭ ‬The positions of the member states were co-ordinated in the so-called‭ ‬Article 133‭ Committee‬.‭ ‬This committee too is sheltered from public scrutiny.‭ ‬Hence,‭ ‬citizens don't know their own government's position on ACTA and have no one to hold accountable.‭

In an open IT society the situation raises several concerns.‭ ‬First of all,‭ ‬ACTA could be another step in the direction of more government control of citizens.‭ ‬Secondly,‭ ‬the behind-closed-doors process puts normal democratic rules out of play.‭ ‬Member states that value openness must make clear to the EU establishment that they don't accept what is now happening,‭ ‬and that they will not join an international convention that is established on the current terms.

The author is a representative of the Moderate Party in the Swedish Parliament


The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

EU's secretive anti-piracy talks cause concern

EU officials are working on a global intellectual property treaty which could rewrite national legislation on copyright, but which is being put together in a secretive process which helps to "launder" policies that may be too unpopular to pass through normal democratic channels.


Drums of war again, in Europe

Just a few weeks ago, as Europeans in several countries put their furious debates about masks and corona appsinto higher gear, Turkey and Greece almost came to blows in the Aegean Sea.

Schrems privacy ruling risks EU's ties to digital world

With more and more trade moving to the digital realm, Europe can ill-afford to cut itself off. Meanwhile, China continues to advance a vision for an internet that is fractured along national boundaries and controlled by governments.

Worrying rows over future EU chemicals policy

It is of utmost concern to the environmental health community that forces within the EU Commission are actively trying to push back against a European Green Deal that is supposed to put people's health at its core.


An open letter to the EPP on end of Hungary's press freedom

I hate to break it to you, but excuses have run out. You have to look at the images of sobbing journalists in Index's newsroom, and shoulder part of the blame. Your silence, your continued procrastination led to this.

Why EU beats US on green pandemic recovery

The United States recovery focused on a number of important issues, including unemployment benefits and funding for health care providers, but lacked any programs directed towards addressing pollution, renewable energy industries, and clean technology improvements.

Revealed: fossil-fuel lobbying behind EU hydrogen strategy

As with the German government – which presented its own hydrogen strategy last month – the European Commission and other EU institutions appear to be similarly intoxicated by the false promises of the gas industry.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDANext generation Europe should be green and circular
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNEW REPORT: Eight in ten people are concerned about climate change
  3. UNESDAHow reducing sugar and calories in soft drinks makes the healthier choice the easy choice
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersGreen energy to power Nordic start after Covid-19
  5. European Sustainable Energy WeekThis year’s EU Sustainable Energy Week (EUSEW) will be held digitally!
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic states are fighting to protect gender equality during corona crisis

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us