Monday

15th Aug 2022

Opinion

Russia on road to nowhere after WTO departure

Nobody wanted to believe it could happen, then it happened. According to Maxim Medvedkov, Russia's chief negotiator on World Trade Organisation (WTO) accession, the WTO on 17 June in Geneva "received an unofficial, verbal notification of the suspension of talks during the time necessary for consultations."

Russia at the same time informed WTO members of plans to start accession talks as part of an (as yet unformed) customs union consisting of Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus. The 17 June decision was the logical conclusion of Russian premier Vladimir Putin's announcement at the 9 June EurAsEC Intergovernmental Council that the three states would quit their WTO applications and create the customs union on 1 January 2010.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • Russia's "milk war" with Belarus casts doubt on the purity of its motives (Photo: Wikipedia)

None of the states have yet officially notified the WTO of their decisions. And the EU is holding fire on its official reaction, with EU trade commissioner Catherine Ashton's spokesman on 11 June saying Brussels is "seeking clarity" from Moscow.

But Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has dampened hopes of a Russian u-turn. "The withdrawal of the [WTO] application is a technical issue. It was de-facto withdrawn with the statement of the prime eministerminister, and the WTO will receive official documents very soon," he told media.

I will not speculate here about the practicability of creating such a custom union and its potential accession to the WTO. Consultations with around 60 to 70 WTO states have already shown that such a move, even if it is possible, would slow down accession considerably.

But I will consider why the decision was taken and its potential consequences for Russia's future, its place in the world and its relations with the international community.

Consideration of Russian motives is hampered by Moscow's opacity - even key Russian negotiators did not know about the planned decision. Now, they are trying to justify it retrospectively, saying it will not delay Russian accession, when in fact it destroys 16 years of their WTO-related work.

Some see the WTO decision as part of a domestic policy struggle in Russia, against the backdrop of an alleged split between Mr Putin and the more liberal Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. If this is true, it would mean that national interests are being sacrificed in a battle to show who is boss. Would this not be too high a price to pay?

This opinion only holds water if there is indeed a rift. It is possible that some contradictions exist due to their blurred relationship. But there is no evidence so far of any open conflict between the two leaders on key issues. So this kind of speculation cannot be taken into account when forming an opinion on the WTO move.

Others see the WTO move as linked to Russia's frustration with the accession process: it has come very close to becoming a member over the 16 long years of talks, but never quite made it. The decision to change the format of the negotiations might be an attempt to augment Russia's importance as a WTO member. But would it not be more productive to simply meet accession requirements?

Benefit of the doubt?

Perhaps Russia really cares about the regional integration of the post-Soviet space and wants to help these countries join the global economic community, with the European Economic Community as a model.

But how could this be reconciled with Russia's "milk war" against Belarus (Russia is raising tariffs on Belarusian milk amid a political dispute) and its demands for Belarus payments of "gas debts?"

Taking the argument further, if Russia had such noble aims, the following conditions would have been met:

Russia would have notified the WTO secretariat in advance of its decision;

steps toward creating the customs union would have been taken earlier and would have been more focused; the three countries would have already synchronised their WTO talks to make the switch to customs union-level talks less painful.

To date, the trio's WTO progress has been uneven: Russia has agreed 90 percent of its admission terms, Kazakhstan has agreed 70 percent and Belarus barely 10 percent.

In fact, none of the conditions have been met, putting the nobility of Russia's motives in doubt, and raising the possibility that present-day Russia is simply unwilling to join the WTO.

The economic crisis, prompting increased Russian protectionism, could instead lie behind the decision. Regional integration could simply be a pretext to quit the process at a time when Russia's accession is expected in the very near future. The desire to knock together a customs union could also be related to political nostalgia for the Soviet Union.

Irrespective of motives, the potential consequences for Russia's relations with the rest of the world are disturbing.

If nothing else, the move could further tarnish the country's image. In the Ukraine "gas war" in January Russia lost its reputation as a "reliable partner." Now it risks losing the title of "predictable partner" - an important requirement in the international community.

EU-Russia deal at risk

EU-Russia negotiations on a new strategic bilateral agreement include the creation of a free trade area, which would only possible after Russian WTO accession. Now this prospect is becoming dim. Prospects of "resetting" relations with the US could also suffer.

Russia itself is set to suffer the most. The rhetoric that Russia, having cut itself off from the rest of the world, will be able to support national manufacturers, cannot be taken seriously. The argument that it is easier to deal with the economic crisis alone, or with regional partners whose potential for a fast economic turnaround is even lower, is unconvincing.

The WTO is the economic model of an open society. Abandonment or substantial delay of WTO integration means refusal or delay to integration with the global open community. It means reluctance to play by common rules, and, in the end, amounts to self-isolation.

This kind of self-isolation is useful only for keeping an incumbent regime in power. If protectionism and self-isolation are the real reasons for Russia's WTO departure, one can only feel sorry for the Russian people, who are being deprived of the hope of a bright future. Self-isolation in today's globalised world is a road to nowhere.

Olena Prystayko is a research fellow at the EU-Russia Centre in Brussels.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

EU must beware Beijing's new charm offensive

The EU needs to be clear eyed about China's new diplomatic charm offensive, as it's more likely driven by short-term necessity than any fundamental policy re-assessment.

Only Western unity can stop Iran hostage-diplomacy

The Belgian parliament's recent decision to ratify its prisoner-exchange treaty with Iran is a grave mistake, and one which exemplifies the many downfalls of dealing with Iran's human-rights abuses on a case-by-case basis.

Russia puts EU in nuclear-energy paradox

There's unprecedented international anxiety about the safety of Ukraine's nuclear reactors, but many European countries are also turning to nuclear power to secure energy supplies.

How Ukraine made the case anew for an EU army

The Kremlin attacked Ukraine because it believed it could afford to. It perceived nuclear deterrence between Russia and the West as reciprocal, and therefore almost a non-issue. It also saw, in military terms, Europe is disappearing from the world map.

Column

Global hunger crisis requires more than just the Odessa deal

International donors are playing hide and seek. Instead of stepping up their assistance programmes, richer nations are cutting overseas aid, or reallocating funds from other parts of the world towards the Ukraine crisis.

Exploiting the Ukraine crisis for Big Business

From food policy to climate change, corporate lobbyists are exploiting the Ukraine crisis to try to slash legislation that gets in the way of profit. But this is only making things worse.

News in Brief

  1. Zelensky vows to 'target' Russian soldiers at nuclear plant
  2. Putin vows greater cooperation with North Korea and Taliban
  3. Hungarian judge slams Orbán's rule-of-law attacks
  4. Borrell condemns 'despicable' Rushdie attack
  5. Slow wind-farm approvals risk green goals, warns industry
  6. Increase in people crossing Channel to UK in 2022
  7. Swedish government to toughen gang-crime penalties
  8. Germany to help nationals cope with energy price spike

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online
  3. European Centre for Press and Media FreedomEuropean Anti-SLAPP Conference 2022
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers write to EU about new food labelling
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersEmerging journalists from the Nordics and Canada report the facts of the climate crisis
  6. Council of the EUEU: new rules on corporate sustainability reporting

Latest News

  1. Germany needs to cut gas use by 20% to stave off winter crisis
  2. Europe's wildfire destruction set to hit new record
  3. How Putin and Erdoğan are making the West irrelevant
  4. Defying Russian bombs, Ukraine football starts 2022 season
  5. Sweden to extradite man wanted by Turkey
  6. EU must beware Beijing's new charm offensive
  7. Forest fire near Bordeaux forces over 10,000 to flee
  8. Estonia and Latvia sever China club ties

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us