Friday

29th Mar 2024

Opinion

Oil and gas companies tarnish EU reputation

EU leaders are being criticised for lacking a strong voice in north Africa. If they want to have a positive influence in the region, they would do well to look at the impact of their national corporate reporting rules, or lack of them.

It is no coincidence that the struggle for accountability in north Africa has found its way to a country with the world's eighth largest oil reserves – Libya. Much of the country's oil wealth has flown to a small political family that has dominated the country for generations.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Get the EU news that really matters

Instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • EU oil and gas companies are not disclosing their payments made to dictators like Gaddafi (Photo: Paul Lowry)

Where money and resources flow between companies and governments without transparency and accountability, there is always a risk that it will be siphoned off for ill-gotten gain. Two thirds of the world's poor live in resource rich countries, not benefiting enough from the $3 trillion of oil produced in 2009 (while you are reading this, that price is rising).

EU governments are failing people in resource-rich countries by not enforcing strong anti-corruption measures on European multinational companies.

If civil society activists, journalists, or citizens want to make sure governments use income from natural resources to tackle poverty, they need to compare government fiscal revenues with the production and fiscal payments of the companies producing them.

Governments in financial centres can make sure multinational companies act more transparently, so that the resource curse turns into a blessing.

The US Dodd-Frank Act requires all companies registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission to publicly report their payments related to oil, gas or mineral extraction to governments on a country-by-country basis.

The EU commission recognised the importance of country-by-country corporate disclosure in its 2004 Transparency Directive, but it set the bar too low by only "encouraging" member states to introduce their own stricter rules.

As a result, no EU country introduced binding legislation, and the results in EU multinationals' transparency are there for all to see in the report on oil and gas company disclosure published by Transparency International and Revenue Watch Institute this week.

All eight EU companies in the report operate in Egypt, Libya or Algeria. None operate transparently. None reveal the royalty payments they pay to governments.

Of the 12 multinational companies we evaluated that operate in Libya, only the Norwegian company Statoil publicly discloses its payments to the government.

The people of Libya, like all those living in resource rich countries, have a right to this information. So do company investors who want to assess risk. Last week the risk of operating in countries ruled unaccountably was made very clear.

French President Nicholas Sarkozy has said he plans to ask for EU wide rules, and at last week's G20 finance meeting UK Chancellor George Osborne voiced his support, too.

The need for transparency is too great to wait for the EU commission's policy paper on financial reporting. Instead, it should make obligatory reporting of revenue payments to resource rich governments part of the reform of the Transparency Directive expected shortly.

The EU is the world's biggest development aid donor. Why let its efforts be undermined by corruption, which makes development wholly unsustainable? Why risk its reputation as a force for openness and transparency?

When it came to disclosing information on a country-by-country basis, EU companies scored less than North American and Australian ones. Their average score was equal to Lukoil of Russia, four times less than Statoil of Norway.

If the EU does not act, the US-German stock exchange merger (New York Stock Exchange-Euronext with Deutsche Boerse) may end up introducing the stricter US requirements in Europe anyway.

Does the EU want to see its much vaunted single market adapting standards, when it used to be setting them?

The writer is head of Transparency International's Brussels office.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

EU Modernisation Fund: an open door for fossil gas in Romania

Among the largest sources of financing for energy transition of central and eastern European countries, the €60bn Modernisation Fund remains far from the public eye. And perhaps that's one reason it is often used for financing fossil gas projects.

Why UK-EU defence and security deal may be difficult

Rather than assuming a pro-European Labour government in London will automatically open doors in Brussels, the Labour party needs to consider what it may be able to offer to incentivise EU leaders to factor the UK into their defence thinking.

Column

EU's Gaza policy: boon for dictators, bad for democrats

While they woo dictators and autocrats, EU policymakers are becoming ever more estranged from the world's democrats. The real tragedy is the erosion of one of Europe's key assets: its huge reserves of soft power, writes Shada Islam.

Why UK-EU defence and security deal may be difficult

Rather than assuming a pro-European Labour government in London will automatically open doors in Brussels, the Labour party needs to consider what it may be able to offer to incentivise EU leaders to factor the UK into their defence thinking.

Column

EU's Gaza policy: boon for dictators, bad for democrats

While they woo dictators and autocrats, EU policymakers are becoming ever more estranged from the world's democrats. The real tragedy is the erosion of one of Europe's key assets: its huge reserves of soft power, writes Shada Islam.

Latest News

  1. Kenyan traders react angrily to proposed EU clothes ban
  2. Lawyer suing Frontex takes aim at 'antagonistic' judges
  3. Orban's Fidesz faces low-polling jitters ahead of EU election
  4. German bank freezes account of Jewish peace group
  5. EU Modernisation Fund: an open door for fossil gas in Romania
  6. 'Swiftly dial back' interest rates, ECB told
  7. Moscow's terror attack, security and Gaza
  8. Why UK-EU defence and security deal may be difficult

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic Food Systems Takeover at COP28
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersHow women and men are affected differently by climate policy
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersArtist Jessie Kleemann at Nordic pavilion during UN climate summit COP28
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP28: Gathering Nordic and global experts to put food and health on the agenda
  5. Friedrich Naumann FoundationPoems of Liberty – Call for Submission “Human Rights in Inhume War”: 250€ honorary fee for selected poems
  6. World BankWorld Bank report: How to create a future where the rewards of technology benefit all levels of society?

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsThis autumn Europalia arts festival is all about GEORGIA!
  2. UNOPSFostering health system resilience in fragile and conflict-affected countries
  3. European Citizen's InitiativeThe European Commission launches the ‘ImagineEU’ competition for secondary school students in the EU.
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region is stepping up its efforts to reduce food waste
  5. UNOPSUNOPS begins works under EU-funded project to repair schools in Ukraine
  6. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsGeorgia effectively prevents sanctions evasion against Russia – confirm EU, UK, USA

Join EUobserver

EU news that matters

Join us