Sunday

30th Apr 2017

Brussels ‘opens debate' on jump to 30% CO2 cuts

  • A steel furnace: The steel industry is 'relieved' that Brussels has not called for a unilateral jump to a 30 percent cut (Photo: wikipedia)

The European Commission has come out in favour of a unilateral jump to a 30 percent cut in greenhouse gas emissions but is reluctant to say so too loudly.

On Wednesday, the EU executive endorsed an analysis that showed that as a result of the economic crisis and its accompanying decline in industrial output, the costs of moving from its current commitment of a 20 percent cut in emissions to 30 percent were not as significant as once thought.

Dear EUobserver reader

Subscribe now for unrestricted access to EUobserver.

Sign up for 30 days' free trial, no obligation. Full subscription only 15 € / month or 150 € / year.

  1. Unlimited access on desktop and mobile
  2. All premium articles, analysis, commentary and investigations
  3. EUobserver archives

EUobserver is the only independent news media covering EU affairs in Brussels and all 28 member states.

♡ We value your support.

If you already have an account click here to login.

Since 2007, the EU has said it would move to the higher emissions cut by 2020 if other major economies also took on their ‘fair share' of the effort, although the details of what a fair share means are vague.

The discussion is now on whether the EU should unilaterally move to a 30 percent cut both to give an incentive for investment in green technologies and to reclaim Europe's international climate leadership, thought lost in Copenhagen.

In presenting the report, the commissioner for climate action, Connie Hedegaard, said she is somewhat overwhelmed at how quickly competing economies are embracing new environmentally friendly technologies.

"You cannot believe how fast things are moving out there - at a surreal speed," she said of a recent visit to China. "This is the business of the 21st century, it's happening in Korea and Brazil as well."

"If we stand still, we will lose our front-runner status."

As a result of the economic crisis, the cost of meeting the 20 percent target has plummeted from €70 billion per year to €48 billion, according to the commission document.

Meanwhile, the cost of reaching the 30 percent target is now estimated to be €81 billion - just €11 billion higher than how much the EU had originally thought it would have cost to move to its 20 percent target.

Higher energy prices have also encouraged energy efficiency and reduced energy demand and the price of carbon has fallen below the level projected in 2008 as EU ETS allowances not used in the recession are carried forward.

"However, at the same time, this reduction in absolute costs comes in the context of a crisis which has left businesses with much less capacity to find the investment needed to modernise in the short run," notes the commission.

Indeed, when unveiling a report that showed how much cheaper it is now to move to the higher target and how the EU can go about doing it, Ms Hedegaard said explicitly now is not the right time to make such a move.

"Are conditions right? Would it make sense at this moment? The answer would be no," she said, adding that it was a "political decision" for EU leaders to make "when the timing and conditions are right.

"As we exit the crisis, the commission has now provided input for a fact-based discussion. The decision is not for now," continued the Danish commissioner, who is known to personally strongly back a unilateral jump to the higher target.

"But I hope that our analysis will inspire the debate in the member states on the way forward."

Firing a shot across the bow on the eve of the publication of the report, France and Germany jointly attacked a move to 30 percent. Poland and Italy feel that the move is premature.

At the same time, the new Conservative-Liberal coalition government in the UK, however, is sticking by its Labour predecessor's line that it is in the EU's best interest to make the shift, and even included such a commitment in the new administration's coalition agreement.

UK secretary of state for energy and climate, Chris Huhne, welcomed the report, saying: "Global climate change is the biggest challenges the world faces and securing an ambitious deal is a priority for this government. That's why we will push for the EU to demonstrate leadership by supporting an increase in the EU emissions reduction target to 30 percent by 2020."

Industry was overjoyed at the procrastination, describing the confusing end result of the investigation a "return to realism," in the words of Gordon Moffat, the director general of Eurofer, the European steel industry association.

The group added that it was "relieved by today's decision of the European Commission not to propose a unilateral EU move from -20 percent to -30 percent."

Eurochambres, the European chamber of commerce, had a better sense of the tug-of-war when it said that it was "alarmed" at the commission analysis but "welcomed" the re-iteration that conditions still apply for the EU to move to the higher cut.

While economic conditions have developed for the worse since the EU first made its 20/30 percent offer in 2007, the science of climate change has also developed.

Earlier analyses that suggested cuts of between 25 and 40 percent on 1990 levels by 2020 on the part of developed countries would be enough to keep the average global temperature increase below two degrees - the cut-off point for catastrophic climate change - scientists now say the upper end of that scale will be necessary to meet that same goal.

But such a shift, from a unilateral 20-percent cut and conditional 30-percent cut, to a unilateral 30 percent cut and a conditional 40 percent cut will not be part of the EU's new debate, according to Ms Hedegaard.

"It makes no sense to discuss 40 percent if we are still discussing 30 percent. We should not bash each other with percentages," she told reporters.

Member states vary in EU 'polluter pays' rules

An EU directive aimed at supporting the "polluter pays principle" has resulted in a patchwork situation, but the European Commission is not yet ready to propose a change.

Analysis

EU transport sector has a CO2 problem

Although car manufacturers are reaching their CO2 targets for their fleets, car usage has gone up in Germany, while the gap between lab results and actual fuel consumption has increased.

Column / Crude World

Nord Stream 2: The elephant in the room

The European Commission should provide a thorough impact assessment of Nord Stream 2, a project that appears to go against all of its Energy Union objectives.

News in Brief

  1. Vote of no confidence prepared against Spanish PM
  2. Syria to buy Russian anti-missile system
  3. Germany seeks partial burka ban
  4. Libya has no plan to stop migration flows
  5. EU has no evidence of NGO-smuggler collusion in Libya
  6. Poland gets 'final warning' on logging in ancient forest
  7. Commission gives Italy final warning on air pollution
  8. Romania and Slovenia taken to court over environment policies

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. European Healthy Lifestyle AllianceCharlotte Hornets' Nicolas Batum Tells Kids to "Eat Well, Drink Well, Move!"
  2. ECR GroupSyed Kamall: We Need a New, More Honest Relationship With Turkey
  3. Counter BalanceParliament Sends Strong Signal to the EIB: Time to Act on Climate Change
  4. ACCARisks and Opportunities of Blockchain and Shared Ledgers Technologies in Financial Services
  5. UNICEFRace Against Time to Save Millions of Lives in Yemen
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersDeveloping Independent Russian-Language Media in the Baltic Countries
  7. Swedish EnterprisesReform of the European Electricity Market: Lessons from the Nordics, Brussels 2 May
  8. Malta EU 2017Green Light Given for New EU Regulation to Bolster External Border Checks
  9. Counter BalanceCall for EU Commission to Withdraw Support of Trans-Adriatic Pipeline
  10. ACCAEconomic Confidence at Highest Since 2015
  11. European Federation of Allergy and Airways60%-90% of Your Life Is Spent Indoors. How Does Poor Indoor Air Quality Affect You?
  12. European Gaming and Betting AssociationCJEU Confirms Obligation for a Transparent Licensing Process

Latest News

  1. EU boasts unity on Brexit talks
  2. May’s election juggernaut
  3. EPP scolds Orban over university and NGO laws
  4. Oxford-Studie besorgt über 'Schrott' News in Frankreich
  5. Alte Freundschaft zwischen Le Pen und Putin
  6. EP chief faces questions after homophobic 'summit'
  7. EU signals Northern Ireland could join if united with Ireland
  8. One year later: EU right to open internet still virtual

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region and the US: A Time of Warlike Rhetoric and Militarisation?
  2. European Free AllianceEFA MEPs Vote in Favor of European Parliament's Brexit Mandate
  3. Mission of China to the EUXinhua Insight: China to Open up Like Never Before
  4. World VisionViolence Becomes New Normal for Syrian Children
  5. International Partnership for Human RightsTime to Turn the Tide and End Repression of Central Asia's Civil Society
  6. European Free AllianceAutonomia to Normalnosc - Poland Urged to Re-Grant Autonomy to Silesia
  7. UNICEFHitting Rock Bottom - How 2016 Became the Worst Year for #ChildrenofSyria
  8. Malta EU 2017Green Light Given for New EU Regulation to Bolster External Border Checks
  9. ACCAG20 Citizens Want 'Big Picture' Tax Policymaking, According to Global Survey
  10. Belgrade Security ForumCall for Papers: European Union as a Global Crisis Manager - Deadline 30 April
  11. European Gaming & Betting Association60 Years Rome Treaty – 60 Years Building an Internal Market
  12. Malta EU 2017New EU Rules to Prevent Terrorism and Give More Rights to Victims Approved