Monday

25th Mar 2019

MEPs want wider scope for national GMO bans

Members of the European Parliament's environment committee have said national governments should be allowed to ban GMO cultivation on environmental grounds.

The decision by MEPs on Tuesday (12 April), goes beyond a proposal put forward by the European Commission last July to partially renationalise decisions over GMO cultivation, after years of deadlock in the area.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

  • French protesters signal their dislike for GM crops (Photo: EUobserver)

Under the commission plan, initial GMO crop approval would remain at the European level, decided along environmental and human health lines, after which member states could then opt to ban a particular crop, based on a different set of criteria.

The commission recently clarified that these additional criteria could include 'public morals', 'public order' and 'cultural policy' reasons, but MEPs argue that governments should also be empowered to cite environmental concerns.

French Liberal MEP Corinne Lepage said parliament had sent a "clear signal" to the other EU institutions after environment committee members backed her report by 34 votes in favour, 10 against and 16 abstentions on Tuesday.

"The EU authorisation system should be maintained," said Lepage. "But it should be acknowledged that some agricultural and environmental impacts, as well as socio-economic impacts linked to contamination, can be cited by member states to justify a ban or restriction on GMO cultivation."

A parliamentary official said the legislature's largest political group, the centre-right EPP, largely abstained during Tuesday's committee vote, but expected MEPs sitting in plenary this June to accept the "main lines" of Lepage's report.

Member states have yet to reach a final position on the commission's proposals, with France and Germany concerned that it could result in the fragmentation of the EU's internal market, as well as run into trouble with the World Trade Organisation.

Others such as anti-GMO Austria and the pro-GMO Netherlands support the plans, on the grounds they will then have greater freedom to pursue their divergent positions on the GMO debate.

But NGOs such as Greenpeace are concerned that national bans will not stand up to legal challenges under the commission proposals. The environmental group welcomed the decision by MEPs on Tuesday.

"Environmental impacts are a major danger of genetically modified crops and including these into law will help governments ban them from Europe's fields," said Greenpeace agriculture policy adviser Stefanie Hundsdorfer.

"Without these grounds, national bans would be in danger of being overturned by biotech companies in court."

EU imposes stiff controls to block Chinese GM rice

EU member states have slapped rigid new controls on all imports of Chinese rice products in the wake of ever-increasing detection of products 'contaminated' with unauthorised genetically modified rice.

GMO maize vote highlights 'absurd' EU rules

The EU commission is set to authorise the cultivation of a genetically modified maize crop, despite opposition from 19 countries: Critics say it showcases "absurd" EU voting rules.

EUobserved

Schoolkid 'climate strikers' outnumber MEPs at debate

In response to the now worldwide movement of concerned school children, the EU parliament held a debate about climate change. But those pupils attending were not allowed to speak, only to listen.

News in Brief

  1. EU leaders at summit demand more effort on disinformation
  2. Report: Corbyn to meet May on Monday for Brexit talks
  3. Petition against Brexit attracts 2.4m signatures
  4. Study: Brexit to cost EU citizens up to €40bn annually
  5. NGOs demand France halt Saudi arm sales
  6. Report: Germany against EU net-zero emissions target
  7. Former top EU official takes job at law firm
  8. Draft text of EU summit has Brexit extension until 22 May

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  4. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  5. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic commitment to driving global gender equality
  7. International Partnership for Human RightsMeet your defender: Rasul Jafarov leading human rights defender from Azerbaijan
  8. UNICEFUNICEF Hosts MEPs in Jordan Ahead of Brussels Conference on the Future of Syria
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic talks on parental leave at the UN
  10. International Partnership for Human RightsTrial of Chechen prisoner of conscience and human rights activist Oyub Titiev continues.
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic food policy inspires India to be a sustainable superpower
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersMilestone for Nordic-Baltic e-ID

Latest News

  1. Italy takes China's new Silk Road to the heart of Europe
  2. What EU leaders agreed on climate - and what they mean
  3. Copyright and (another) new Brexit vote This WEEK
  4. EU avoids Brexit crash, sets new date for 12 April
  5. Campaigning commissioners blur the lines
  6. Slovakia puts squeeze on free press ahead of election
  7. EPP suspends Orban's Fidesz party
  8. Macron is confusing rigidity with strength

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us