Wednesday

22nd Nov 2017

Analysis

UK’s childhood obesity strategy - an EU blueprint?

  • Despite disapproval by health campaigners, the UK's childhood obesity strategy has been lauded as inspiration for other European countries.

Friday (18 August) marks the first anniversary of the UK’s childhood obesity strategy, but there’s little to celebrate according to public health campaigners.

Could the criticisms levied at politicians in Westminster put their counterparts in other European countries off the idea too?

Thank you for reading EUobserver!

Subscribe now for a 30 day free trial.

  1. €150 per year
  2. or €15 per month
  3. Cancel anytime

EUobserver is an independent, not-for-profit news organization that publishes daily news reports, analysis, and investigations from Brussels and the EU member states. We are an indispensable news source for anyone who wants to know what is going on in the EU.

We are mainly funded by advertising and subscription revenues. As advertising revenues are falling fast, we depend on subscription revenues to support our journalism.

For group, corporate or student subscriptions, please contact us. See also our full Terms of Use.

If you already have an account click here to login.

  • One in three children aged between six and nine in Europe is either overweight or obese. (Photo: iStock)

Just last week, the influential healthy eating campaigner and celebrity chef Jamie Oliver claimed the UK’s plan was “awful”.

"What’s even more scary is that when May [the prime minister] released the strategy that she had ruined, I believe her team were genuinely chuffed with what they had done,” he told the Sunday Times magazine.

Oliver has been one of the most vocal critics of a UK strategy that commits to “significantly reduce” the country’s rate of childhood obesity within the next 10 years.

The strategy, however, is simply 12 pages of policies that largely place the onus on industry to self-regulate.

Pizzas to sandwiches

Despite Friday’s announcement of £5m (€5.5m) in funding for a new obesity research unit and a calorie reduction programme, spanning across everything from pizzas to sandwiches, it’s hard to find support amongst the country’s health campaigners – and this has been the case for the past 12 months.

The package was “snuck out” last year, with little publicity, and was met with strong disapproval by campaigners and retailers. This was a plan that had been torn apart in the aftermath of the Brexit vote and a change in prime minister, they said.

A sugar tax on sweet drinks remained, but gone were the hoped-for restrictions on marketing and advertising of junk foods and fizzy drinks. Targets to cut sugar in a range of products by 20 percent, which food manufacturers have said are impossible, are voluntary.

Caroline Cerny, head of the Obesity Health Alliance, a coalition of 40 health charities, medical royal colleges and campaign groups, said current regulations on marketing junk food to children are “full of loopholes”.

Failing to tackle advertising “is significantly undermining the impact of the Childhood Obesity Plan”, she added.

It is well understood that in order to tackle obesity, a number of policy triggers must be pulled – from reformulation of products to the promotion of healthy foods and encouraging exercise.

Governments can take a soft touch or hard line approach with these interventions and many campaigners and academics believe relying on the former won’t curb the epidemic.

In March, three health experts writing in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) said the “severely limited” strategy “watered down the desired discussion of anti-obesogenic medicine”. Advice from advisers at Public Health England (PHE) had by-and-large been ignored.

Yet PHE, an executive agency in the UK's health department, has become a staunch defender of the strategy. Duncan Selbie, the chief executive, has said complaining about what the plan doesn’t include rather than focusing on the “significant action being taken” is “quintessentially British”.

“Let’s implement the plan and start making a difference,” he added.

Inspiration for other EU countries

As the fat hits the fan in the UK, will other countries be inspired to produce more robust obesity strategies of their own, or shy away from the idea altogether?

Nikolai Pushkarev, policy coordinator for food, drink and agriculture at the European Public Health Alliance, believes more national obesity strategies are on the way. “Our hope and expectations is that they will be designed to deliver,” he told EUobserver.

He added: “Without wanting to pass judgment on whether the UK strategy is up to the challenge of fighting child obesity or not, I think the principle of introducing a strategy should act as inspiration for other European countries.”

Europe’s health ministers recently criticised efforts to tackle obesity.

Members of the employment, social policy, health and consumer affairs council (EPSCO) said measures to date “have not been sufficiently effective”. They also questioned the self-regulatory approach: “… experience and evidence point to the fact that voluntary action may require regulatory measures in order to be effective.”

Whether the food industry can be trusted to police itself is a moot point. The World Health Organization (WHO) wants tighter marketing restrictions, especially online, and the World Bank appears to agree.

In a recent report, the Bank noted the “aggressive and sophisticated” way in which processed foods are marketed. This, explained the authors, can “undermine the normal processes of appetite control, cause overconsumption, and therefore obesity, and diseases associated with obesity”.

The Bank suggested government must take the lead; self-regulation is a “highly risky approach” and should “be accompanied by other measures including regulatory actions by the government to enforce certain restrictions”, the authors concluded.

Whilst Europe’s health ministers might agree on paper, the current review of the EU's Audio Visual Media Services Directive suggests the statements are rhetorical rather than revolutionary.

Few politicians have warmed to the idea of nanny-statism but this interventionalist approach seems to be working.

Observers often point to smoking – which according to the McKinsey Global Institute is on a par with obesity in terms of global economic impact – as the model to follow.

“What worked were scary messages on cigarette packets, plus taxation,” noted the Financial Times columnist Simon Kuper in July. “Telling people to exercise and eat healthily doesn’t work. Medics need to hand over the issue to advertising agencies and other people who know how to change behaviour.”

Professor Mark Hanson from the British Heart Foundation, and one of the co-authors of the BMJ paper, said governments “should not hold back” from fiscal measures like taxes and new laws on marketing and packaging that have “brought enormous benefits to child and population health” when applied to the tobacco industry.

Fat taxes

Unlike having a cigarette, recent research shows that Europeans are largely free to eat as they please, with relatively few punitive taxes or restrictions in place.

And while there is certainly an appetite for more taxes on sugary drinks, those alone, as campaigners have long argued, won’t curb obesity. Rolling more levies out to other ingredients or foods is fraught with complications, and bad experiences – consider Denmark’s fat tax that was repealed after just a year. But that doesn’t make the concept a non-starter.

EU health commissioner, Vytenis Adriukaitis, has claimed taxes can be a “very powerful” tool for tackling health issues, though the food industry, generally, is vehemently opposed to the idea.

Research published by the University of Edinburgh in Scotland last month showed that taxes can reduce consumption of target products, generate revenue and become “politically sustainable”.

In their review of more than 100 papers, Alexandra Wright and her colleagues concluded that “there is considerable evidence that taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages and unhealthy food products can have positive health impacts”.

Most of the studies available, however, are based on models or experiments involving “potential” taxes.

Wright called for further assessments of the impact taxes on salt, sugar and/or fat in countries like Finland, Latvia, France, Portugal and Hungary have had. “With more and more countries implementing new kinds of health taxes, there are numerous opportunities for real-world evaluations to substantially strengthen the current evidence base,” Wright explained.

Speaking at the European Congress on Obesity in Portugal back in May, Dr Janas Harrington from the HRB Centre for health and diet research at the University of Cork said there is a “compelling case” for taxing sugary drinks.

Ireland published its obesity strategy last September. “This will be a fascinating experiment in public health policy,” she said.

Whether it is taxes, mandatory (and uniform) application of nutritional labels or restrictions on the promotion of unhealthy foods, many member states will be weighing up how best to tackle soaring levels of obesity.

Nanny-statism

It will take time and patience to determine how effective these are, but it is clear that a package of interventions is required.

Politicians and policymakers shouldn’t be put off by the critiques of the UK’s strategy; rather they should use them to push through better plans of their own, explained Malcolm Clark at the Children’s Food Campaign.

"The UK government may have the cheek to call theirs a 'world-leading' obesity plan, but only a couple of elements come anywhere close. It would be straightforward for other countries to avoid the pitfalls in the UK’s plan,” he told EUobserver.

First, governments must set out a comprehensive strategy which “doesn't shy away from contentious areas”, he said. “They then need to maintain effective cross-government oversight and leadership. And finally they need to have a Plan B up their sleeve of further regulations and fiscal measures to ensure industry compliance."

Given that one in three children aged between six and nine in Europe is either overweight or obese and the epidemic is threatening to bankrupt health services, the pressure is on European ministers to get things right the first time.

Feature

Civil society steps in to fight rising obesity

By 2030, it is estimated that more than 50 percent of Europeans will be obese. With a lack of public policies and coherent strategies, civil society is often the one trying to find a solution.

Europe's obesity battle, a haphazard reality

EU states are alarmed at the bulging waistlines of their citizens, but governments remain unwilling to commit to binding measures or an EU-wide approach to the problem.

Feature

Sedentary pandemic threatens EU health

Children and young people spend too much time playing with smartphones and tablets, eating and drinking unhealthy foods and not moving much, said EU commissioner of health Vytenis Andriukaitis. So what is the EU doing about it?

Supported by

News in Brief

  1. December euro summit still on, Tusk confirms
  2. EU calls for end to Kenya election crisis
  3. Report: Israeli PM invited to meet EU ministers
  4. French banks close Le Pen accounts
  5. Commission relaxes rules on labelling free range eggs
  6. Commission issues €34m fine over car equipment cartel
  7. Estonian presidency 'delighted' with emissions trading vote
  8. Mladic found guilty of genocide and war crimes

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Idealist Quarterly"Dear Politics, Time to Meet Creativity!" Afterwork Discussion & Networking
  2. Mission of China to the EUAmbassador Zhang Ming Received by Tusk; Bright Future for EU-China Relations
  3. EU2017EEEstonia, With the ECHAlliance, Introduces the Digital Health Society Declaration
  4. ILGA EuropeFreedom of Movement For All Families? Same Sex Couple Ask EU Court for Recognition
  5. European Jewish CongressEJC to French President Macron: We Oppose All Contact With Far-Right & Far-Left
  6. EPSUWith EU Pillar of Social Rights in Place, Time Is Ticking for Commission to Deliver
  7. ILGA EuropeBan on LGBTI Events in Ankara Must Be Overturned
  8. Bio-Based IndustriesBio-Based Industries: European Growth is in Our Nature!
  9. Dialogue PlatformErdogan's Most Vulnerable Victims: Women and Children
  10. UNICEFEuropean Parliament Marks World Children's Day by Launching Dialogue With Children
  11. European Jewish CongressAntisemitism in Europe Today: Is It Still a Threat to Free and Open Society?
  12. Counter BalanceNew Report: Juncker Plan Backs Billions in Fossil Fuels and Carbon-Heavy Infrastructure

Latest News

  1. Mali blames West for chaos in Libya
  2. Orban stokes up his voters with anti-Soros 'consultation'
  3. Commission warns Italy over high debt level
  4. Mladic found guilty for Bosnia genocide and war crimes
  5. Uber may face fines in EU for keeping data breach secret
  6. EU counter-propaganda 'harms' relations, Russia says
  7. The EU's half-hearted Ostpolitik
  8. Glyphosate: 1.3 million EU citizens call for ban

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic countries prioritise fossil fuel subsidy reform
  2. Mission of China to the EUNew era for China brings new opportunities to all
  3. ACCASmall and Medium Sized Practices Must 'Offer the Whole Package'
  4. UNICEFAhead of the African Union - EU Summit, Survey Highlights Impact of Conflict on Education
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council Calls for Closer Co-Operation on Foreign Policy
  6. Swedish EnterprisesTrilogue Negotiations - Striking the Balance Between Transparency and Efficiency
  7. Access EuropeProspects for US-EU Relations Under the Trump Administration - 28 November 2017
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersSustainable Growth the Nordic Way: Climate Solutions for a Sustainable Future
  9. EU2017EEHow Data Fuels Estonia's Economy
  10. Mission of China to the EUChina and EU Step Up Water Management Cooperation
  11. CECEMachinery Industry Calls for Joint EU Approach to Develop Digital Construction Sector
  12. EnelNo ETS Deal Means It Can Still Be Strengthened