Thursday

6th Aug 2020

Opinion

British MPs vote on EU referendum

  • Amended or not, the motion does not call for an In/Out referendum and this has been ignored by the media (Photo: Paul Vallejo)

On Monday afternoon (24 October) the House of Commons will be debating the question whether there should be a referendum on Britain’s membership and position in the European Union. Matters to do with the EU have been debated in both the Commons and the Lords at various times but there has not been a debate in either House on whether there should be a referendum in the country since the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty.

All three main parties had promised a referendum on the Constitution for Europe but the Labour Government announced, in defiance of a Commons Select Committee Report, that the Lisbon Treaty was sufficiently different to make a referendum unnecessary. The Conservative leader, David Cameron, promised a referendum on the treaty if the Conservatives win the election and the Liberal-Democrats suggested an In/Out one. Many analysts think that reneging on the promise to hold that referendum on the Lisbon Treaty deprived David Cameron and the Conservatives of the necessary support for them to win outright in the 2010 General Election.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The campaign for an In/Out referendum on the EU has been gathering pace in the country, with 100,000 people recently signing an e-petition for the Commons to hold a debate on the subject. On Saturday there was a well-attended all-day conference in Westminster in which speakers from all parties and groups from every part of the political spectrum called for a referendum. A motion was put down by a Conservative Backbench MP, David Nuttall, and signed by numerous other MPs from all parties.

This is not a debate to hold a referendum, merely a call upon the government (if the motion is passed) to pass legislation in the next session of Parliament to hold a referendum. In order to have any referendum in the UK, full or partial, there needs to be parliamentary legislation. The next session will open next spring, as the coalition government decided not to have the state opening this autumn.

The referendum proposed in the motion is a three-option one: staying in, pulling out and renegotiating the terms of Britain’s membership of the EU. There are also various amendments put down by other MPs, including the Green, Caroline Lucas, and another Conservative, George Eustice, which aim to water down the motion even further. Amended or not, the motion does not call for an In/Out referendum and this has been ignored by the media.

The leaders of the three main parties have called on their members to oppose the motion in its entirety. David Cameron expressed the view that this is not the time to start discussing Britain’s membership; other politicians think that with the eurozone’s many problems and the growing disenchantment with the EU across various member states, this is precisely the time to think about it. The latter maintain that the majority of the country’s population want to withdraw.

In fact, opinion poll evidence for this is contradictory and the result of a three-option referendum is not easy to predict, though there is indication that the third option, renegotiation, would have more support than the other two. The difficulty there is explaining to people the severe limitations on the possibility of any meaningful renegotiation of the terms of membership and the consequent disenchantment by the electorate if they find that they had voted for something that cannot be put into place.

The motion is non-binding – the government can ignore it even if it is passed but it is unwise for any government to ignore the clearly expressed will of the House of Commons. The question is whether it will be passed.

At present around 70 Conservative MPs have signed the motion and it is expected that they will vote for it, together with some from other parties but it does not look like the necessary majority will be mustered unless there is an even larger rebellion in at least one of the main parties. Nor does it look likely that any of the amendments will be passed but debating them will take up all the afternoon and evening. It is expected that the House will divide for a final vote (there may well be earlier votes on the various amendments) at around 10 o’clock.

Helen Szamuely is a writer and researcher on political affairs, based in London

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Cameron tries to save face on mooted treaty change

A 'limited treaty change' will allow Britain to 'advance its agenda', British PM Cameron said Sunday after failing to stop EU leaders from opening that perspective, one day ahead of a key vote in the British parliament.

Cameron faces tricky EU vote on Monday

British Prime Minister David Cameron has so far managed to keep his party’s tortured relationship with the EU in the background but a motion for EU referendum on Monday looks set to change this.

Letter

An open letter to the EPP on end of Hungary's press freedom

I hate to break it to you, but excuses have run out. You have to look at the images of sobbing journalists in Index's newsroom, and shoulder part of the blame. Your silence, your continued procrastination led to this.

Why EU beats US on green pandemic recovery

The United States recovery focused on a number of important issues, including unemployment benefits and funding for health care providers, but lacked any programs directed towards addressing pollution, renewable energy industries, and clean technology improvements.

Why hydrogen is no magic solution for EU Green Deal

Why is the EU Commission promoting a lose-lose (pay more, get less) strategy rather than the straightforward use of green electricity, where it will deliver bigger CO2-reductions and for less money?

Revealed: fossil-fuel lobbying behind EU hydrogen strategy

As with the German government – which presented its own hydrogen strategy last month – the European Commission and other EU institutions appear to be similarly intoxicated by the false promises of the gas industry.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDANext generation Europe should be green and circular
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNEW REPORT: Eight in ten people are concerned about climate change
  3. UNESDAHow reducing sugar and calories in soft drinks makes the healthier choice the easy choice
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersGreen energy to power Nordic start after Covid-19
  5. European Sustainable Energy WeekThis year’s EU Sustainable Energy Week (EUSEW) will be held digitally!
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic states are fighting to protect gender equality during corona crisis

Latest News

  1. Rainbow flag protesters charged by Polish police
  2. An open letter to the EPP on end of Hungary's press freedom
  3. Renew Europe has a plan to combat gender-violence
  4. Why EU beats US on green pandemic recovery
  5. Azerbaijan ambassador to EU shared anti-George Floyd post
  6. Polish party roars back at EU on LGBTI fines
  7. EU: Hong Kong election delay undermines democracy
  8. Why hydrogen is no magic solution for EU Green Deal

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us