Tuesday

26th May 2020

Opinion

British MPs vote on EU referendum

  • Amended or not, the motion does not call for an In/Out referendum and this has been ignored by the media (Photo: Paul Vallejo)

On Monday afternoon (24 October) the House of Commons will be debating the question whether there should be a referendum on Britain’s membership and position in the European Union. Matters to do with the EU have been debated in both the Commons and the Lords at various times but there has not been a debate in either House on whether there should be a referendum in the country since the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty.

All three main parties had promised a referendum on the Constitution for Europe but the Labour Government announced, in defiance of a Commons Select Committee Report, that the Lisbon Treaty was sufficiently different to make a referendum unnecessary. The Conservative leader, David Cameron, promised a referendum on the treaty if the Conservatives win the election and the Liberal-Democrats suggested an In/Out one. Many analysts think that reneging on the promise to hold that referendum on the Lisbon Treaty deprived David Cameron and the Conservatives of the necessary support for them to win outright in the 2010 General Election.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The campaign for an In/Out referendum on the EU has been gathering pace in the country, with 100,000 people recently signing an e-petition for the Commons to hold a debate on the subject. On Saturday there was a well-attended all-day conference in Westminster in which speakers from all parties and groups from every part of the political spectrum called for a referendum. A motion was put down by a Conservative Backbench MP, David Nuttall, and signed by numerous other MPs from all parties.

This is not a debate to hold a referendum, merely a call upon the government (if the motion is passed) to pass legislation in the next session of Parliament to hold a referendum. In order to have any referendum in the UK, full or partial, there needs to be parliamentary legislation. The next session will open next spring, as the coalition government decided not to have the state opening this autumn.

The referendum proposed in the motion is a three-option one: staying in, pulling out and renegotiating the terms of Britain’s membership of the EU. There are also various amendments put down by other MPs, including the Green, Caroline Lucas, and another Conservative, George Eustice, which aim to water down the motion even further. Amended or not, the motion does not call for an In/Out referendum and this has been ignored by the media.

The leaders of the three main parties have called on their members to oppose the motion in its entirety. David Cameron expressed the view that this is not the time to start discussing Britain’s membership; other politicians think that with the eurozone’s many problems and the growing disenchantment with the EU across various member states, this is precisely the time to think about it. The latter maintain that the majority of the country’s population want to withdraw.

In fact, opinion poll evidence for this is contradictory and the result of a three-option referendum is not easy to predict, though there is indication that the third option, renegotiation, would have more support than the other two. The difficulty there is explaining to people the severe limitations on the possibility of any meaningful renegotiation of the terms of membership and the consequent disenchantment by the electorate if they find that they had voted for something that cannot be put into place.

The motion is non-binding – the government can ignore it even if it is passed but it is unwise for any government to ignore the clearly expressed will of the House of Commons. The question is whether it will be passed.

At present around 70 Conservative MPs have signed the motion and it is expected that they will vote for it, together with some from other parties but it does not look like the necessary majority will be mustered unless there is an even larger rebellion in at least one of the main parties. Nor does it look likely that any of the amendments will be passed but debating them will take up all the afternoon and evening. It is expected that the House will divide for a final vote (there may well be earlier votes on the various amendments) at around 10 o’clock.

Helen Szamuely is a writer and researcher on political affairs, based in London

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Cameron tries to save face on mooted treaty change

A 'limited treaty change' will allow Britain to 'advance its agenda', British PM Cameron said Sunday after failing to stop EU leaders from opening that perspective, one day ahead of a key vote in the British parliament.

Cameron faces tricky EU vote on Monday

British Prime Minister David Cameron has so far managed to keep his party’s tortured relationship with the EU in the background but a motion for EU referendum on Monday looks set to change this.

How coronavirus might hit EU defence spending

Among the casualties of coronavirus - worldwide and in the EU - is the defence sector. However, the Covid-19 pandemic has not made the world a less dangerous place and there is no alternative to having a functioning defence system.

Column

That German court ruling hurts EU rule-of-law fightback

The short-term damage to financial markets may be smaller than feared. The damage to democracy is considerable because it weakened the ECJ - the most effective institution to stop attacks against democracy and rule of law in EU member states.

China's cat-and mouse game blocking web content no model for EU

The angriest citizens can turn to protests or violence, leading governments to increase control and monitoring of platforms, reinforcing the problem. This painful point has to be made to stop the EU repeating China's mistake of top-down internet regulation.

Column

Saving Europe from corona's nasty geopolitics

Four months into the corona crisis and one month into the social and economic shutdown, it seems the big geopolitical loser of the pandemic is likely going to be Europe.

Coronavirus: A test of the West

We are experiencing the first global pandemic unfolding in the 24/7 news cycle and taking its toll, in real time, on our daily lives, our financial security and the global economy.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. European Sustainable Energy WeekThis year’s EU Sustainable Energy Week (EUSEW) will be held digitally!
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic states are fighting to protect gender equality during corona crisis
  3. UNESDACircularity works, let’s all give it a chance
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers call for post-corona synergies between economic recovery and green transition
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic co-operation on COVID-19
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic research collaboration on pandemics

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking Europe’s Economy Circular – the time is now
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersScottish parliament seeks closer collaboration with the Nordic Council
  3. UNESDAFrom Linear to Circular – check out UNESDA's new blog
  4. Nordic Council of Ministers40 years of experience have proven its point: Sustainable financing actually works
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ministers paving the way for 5G in the region
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersEarmarked paternity leave – an effective way to change norms

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us