Saturday

13th Apr 2024

Opinion

Cameron's tight-rope walk on free movement

  • Cameron is coming under pressure from his Conservative party to demand a cap on EU migration. (Photo: gov.uk)

EU migration will be the key battle in the UK election next year. That’s obvious. Polls show that immigration is the number one issue for British voters; they care about it more than the economy - and after years of debating the recession, cuts and unemployment - that’s saying something.

Party Conference season just ended, and the primary concern Conservative (and Labour) MPs were feeding back from their door-step chats with voters was: “what are you going to do about immigration?’

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Get the EU news that really matters

Instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

A large proportion of voters believe that the UK has no control of its borders, and that EU migrants are putting an unmanageable strain on local resources, draining the welfare system and under-cutting the British labour force. Just this week David Cameron promised his MPs a “big bang” on EU immigration.

What that “big bang” will look like is still unclear, though Number 10 is reportedly floating the idea of an “emergency brake” – a potential curb on the number of migrants from certain EU countries. An announcement is expected before Christmas.

Fairness or volume?

There are two main themes to the UK’s debate on EU migrants. One is in terms of fairness, and the other is in terms of volume. The fairness issue revolves around how to tailor sound and transparent rules governing how and when EU migrants can access social and unemployment benefits. The second revolves around the number of EU migrants coming to the UK.

In its assessment of the UK-EU relationship (the so-called ‘Balance of Competences Review’), the UK government identified migrants’ access to welfare as a key area to renegotiate with the EU. The mainstream parties, including the Liberal Democrats, are all favour of this approach. And in this arena, the UK has allies across Europe, including Germany, Austria, Holland and Denmark - who are having similar domestic debates.

Crucially, EU rules on who can access benefits and when were drafted with a small group of homogenous countries in mind - not 28 member states with vastly different wealth levels and welfare systems, so it makes sense to change them, both from a practical view, and in order to maintain public confidence in the principle of Free Movement.

Still, some of these proposals push the boundaries of EU law — and there are several cases pending at the European Court of Justice that will determine how far they can go. (Germany’s case, for example, as to how long “economically inactive” migrants can be excluded from receiving benefits.) Nonetheless, if re-writing the rules on access to welfare is central is to the UK’s EU renegotiation ahead of a possible in/out EU referendum in 2017 — the chances of reaching some kind of deal are favourable.

But, increasingly, politicians are pressuring Cameron to turn to volume – the calculation being that a deal on fairness will not be enough for the electorate (and for some MPs). For a while now, some Conservative heavy-weights have openly been flirting with the idea. Popular amongst some of Cameron’s rebellious backbenchers is an Australian-style “points-based system” (a UKIP policy.)

Promising too much on migration

Given the sensitivity around immigration, it would be a political death-wish for Cameron to make promises on EU migration that he cannot deliver. The key question is whether the Prime Minister is raising expectations so high at home, that he is setting himself up for failure on any potential renegotiation in Europe.

Taking on the volume issue is a different beast entirely. Any kind of cap on Free Movement - a fundamental tenet of the EU - will certainly require a change in the Treaties: a process which requires unanimous support from the other 27 member states. It's not impossible, but it will be an uphill struggle.

Even if Free Movement becomes an unassailable stumbling bloc in EU-UK negotiations, resulting in a British exit, the challenge doesn’t end there. Brexit negotiations will take place under the notorious Article 50. After two years, the UK will be presented with a take-it or leave-it deal as to its future relations with the EU.

As the leaked tape, in which the Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikosrski accused Cameron of having “f***** it up” in Europe, revealed, even if Britain heads for the exit, it may still find it difficult to block Free Movement. Some EU member states are likely to insist upon Free Movement as a condition for the UK to maintain access to the Single Market. And access to the Single Market is something that even the most ardent “better-off-outers” in Britain insist they want.

All of which underscores that Cameron is treading a fine line. It’s clear he cannot afford to ignore the immigration issue, but in doing so he risks alienating both his partners in Europe and his electorate at home.

The writer is the Communications Director at the Open Europe think tank

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Calling time on Amazon's monopolism and exploitation

As Amazon's founder Jeff Bezos just reclaimed the title of the richest person on Earth, its workers cannot even take a bathroom break under the pressure of meeting inhumane performance targets.

The Bolsonaro-Orbán far-right nexus

Defeated far-right Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro has given various reasons for sheltering at the Hungarian embassy in Brasilia — none of them make sense.

The problem of corruption in Ukraine — and a solution

Sunlight is the best disinfectant— so in a way, it is encouraging to see corruption scandals coming to the fore, as this may deter potential future graft, a key prerequisite for Kyiv's eventual EU accession.

This 'deregulation' lobbying now threatens EU economy

Next week's EU summit (17-18 April) will discuss the strategic agenda for the next five years. The current "competitiveness agenda" is to a large extent driven by a big lobbying campaign — so far, not well covered by the media.

Latest News

  1. UK-EU deal on Gibraltar only 'weeks away'
  2. Belgium declares war on MEPs who took Russian 'cash'
  3. Brussels Dispatches: Foreign interference in the spotlight
  4. Calling time on Amazon's monopolism and exploitation
  5. Resist backlash on deforestation law, green groups tell EU
  6. China's high-quality development brings opportunities to the world
  7. Ukraine tops aid list again, but EU spending slumps
  8. Who did Russia pay? MEPs urge spies to give names

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic Food Systems Takeover at COP28
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersHow women and men are affected differently by climate policy
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersArtist Jessie Kleemann at Nordic pavilion during UN climate summit COP28
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP28: Gathering Nordic and global experts to put food and health on the agenda
  5. Friedrich Naumann FoundationPoems of Liberty – Call for Submission “Human Rights in Inhume War”: 250€ honorary fee for selected poems
  6. World BankWorld Bank report: How to create a future where the rewards of technology benefit all levels of society?

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsThis autumn Europalia arts festival is all about GEORGIA!
  2. UNOPSFostering health system resilience in fragile and conflict-affected countries
  3. European Citizen's InitiativeThe European Commission launches the ‘ImagineEU’ competition for secondary school students in the EU.
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region is stepping up its efforts to reduce food waste
  5. UNOPSUNOPS begins works under EU-funded project to repair schools in Ukraine
  6. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsGeorgia effectively prevents sanctions evasion against Russia – confirm EU, UK, USA

Join EUobserver

EU news that matters

Join us