23rd Sep 2017


Cameron's tight-rope walk on free movement

  • Cameron is coming under pressure from his Conservative party to demand a cap on EU migration. (Photo:

EU migration will be the key battle in the UK election next year. That’s obvious. Polls show that immigration is the number one issue for British voters; they care about it more than the economy - and after years of debating the recession, cuts and unemployment - that’s saying something.

Party Conference season just ended, and the primary concern Conservative (and Labour) MPs were feeding back from their door-step chats with voters was: “what are you going to do about immigration?’

Thank you for reading EUobserver!

Subscribe now and get 40% off for an annual subscription. Sale ends soon.

  1. €90 per year. Use discount code EUOBS40%
  2. or €15 per month
  3. Cancel anytime

EUobserver is an independent, not-for-profit news organization that publishes daily news reports, analysis, and investigations from Brussels and the EU member states. We are an indispensable news source for anyone who wants to know what is going on in the EU.

We are mainly funded by advertising and subscription revenues. As advertising revenues are falling fast, we depend on subscription revenues to support our journalism.

For group, corporate or student subscriptions, please contact us. See also our full Terms of Use.

If you already have an account click here to login.

A large proportion of voters believe that the UK has no control of its borders, and that EU migrants are putting an unmanageable strain on local resources, draining the welfare system and under-cutting the British labour force. Just this week David Cameron promised his MPs a “big bang” on EU immigration.

What that “big bang” will look like is still unclear, though Number 10 is reportedly floating the idea of an “emergency brake” – a potential curb on the number of migrants from certain EU countries. An announcement is expected before Christmas.

Fairness or volume?

There are two main themes to the UK’s debate on EU migrants. One is in terms of fairness, and the other is in terms of volume. The fairness issue revolves around how to tailor sound and transparent rules governing how and when EU migrants can access social and unemployment benefits. The second revolves around the number of EU migrants coming to the UK.

In its assessment of the UK-EU relationship (the so-called ‘Balance of Competences Review’), the UK government identified migrants’ access to welfare as a key area to renegotiate with the EU. The mainstream parties, including the Liberal Democrats, are all favour of this approach. And in this arena, the UK has allies across Europe, including Germany, Austria, Holland and Denmark - who are having similar domestic debates.

Crucially, EU rules on who can access benefits and when were drafted with a small group of homogenous countries in mind - not 28 member states with vastly different wealth levels and welfare systems, so it makes sense to change them, both from a practical view, and in order to maintain public confidence in the principle of Free Movement.

Still, some of these proposals push the boundaries of EU law — and there are several cases pending at the European Court of Justice that will determine how far they can go. (Germany’s case, for example, as to how long “economically inactive” migrants can be excluded from receiving benefits.) Nonetheless, if re-writing the rules on access to welfare is central is to the UK’s EU renegotiation ahead of a possible in/out EU referendum in 2017 — the chances of reaching some kind of deal are favourable.

But, increasingly, politicians are pressuring Cameron to turn to volume – the calculation being that a deal on fairness will not be enough for the electorate (and for some MPs). For a while now, some Conservative heavy-weights have openly been flirting with the idea. Popular amongst some of Cameron’s rebellious backbenchers is an Australian-style “points-based system” (a UKIP policy.)

Promising too much on migration

Given the sensitivity around immigration, it would be a political death-wish for Cameron to make promises on EU migration that he cannot deliver. The key question is whether the Prime Minister is raising expectations so high at home, that he is setting himself up for failure on any potential renegotiation in Europe.

Taking on the volume issue is a different beast entirely. Any kind of cap on Free Movement - a fundamental tenet of the EU - will certainly require a change in the Treaties: a process which requires unanimous support from the other 27 member states. It's not impossible, but it will be an uphill struggle.

Even if Free Movement becomes an unassailable stumbling bloc in EU-UK negotiations, resulting in a British exit, the challenge doesn’t end there. Brexit negotiations will take place under the notorious Article 50. After two years, the UK will be presented with a take-it or leave-it deal as to its future relations with the EU.

As the leaked tape, in which the Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikosrski accused Cameron of having “f***** it up” in Europe, revealed, even if Britain heads for the exit, it may still find it difficult to block Free Movement. Some EU member states are likely to insist upon Free Movement as a condition for the UK to maintain access to the Single Market. And access to the Single Market is something that even the most ardent “better-off-outers” in Britain insist they want.

All of which underscores that Cameron is treading a fine line. It’s clear he cannot afford to ignore the immigration issue, but in doing so he risks alienating both his partners in Europe and his electorate at home.

The writer is the Communications Director at the Open Europe think tank

News in Brief

  1. Dutch state appeals ban on taking air-polluting measures
  2. May proposes 2-year transition period after Brexit
  3. May to call on EU's 'sense of responsibility'
  4. Catalonia has 'contingency plans' for independence vote
  5. Last German polls confirm Merkel's lead
  6. EU to step up sanctions on North Korea
  7. Tusk calls 'euro summit' in December
  8. Report: May to seek two-year EU transition

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EU2017EEEU Finance Ministers Agreed to Develop New Digital Taxation Rules
  2. Mission of China to the EUGermany Stands Ready to Deepen Cooperation With China
  3. World VisionFirst Ever Young People Consultation to Discuss the Much Needed Peace in Europe
  4. European Jewish CongressGermany First Country to Adopt Working Definition of Antisemitism
  5. EU2017EEFour Tax Initiatives to Modernise the EU's Tax System
  6. Dialogue PlatformResponsibility in Practice: Gulen & Islamic Thought
  7. Counter BalanceHuman Rights Concerns Over EIB Loan to the Trans Anatolian Pipeline Project
  8. Mission of China to the EUChina Leads the Global Clean Energy Transition
  9. CES - Silicones EuropeFrom Baking Moulds to Oven Mitts, Silicones Are a Key Ingredient in Kitchens
  10. Martens CentreFor a New Europeanism: How to Put the Motto "Unity in Diversity" Into Practice
  11. Access MBAGet Ahead With an MBA Degree. Top MBA Event in Brussels
  12. Idealist QuarterlyIdealist Quarterly Event: Building Fearless Democracies With Gerald Hensel

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Mission of China to the EUPresident Xi Urges Bigger Global Role for Emerging Economies
  2. EU2017EEAre We Socially Insured in the Future of Work?
  3. European Jewish CongressFrench Authorities to Root Out "Societal Antisemitism" After Jewish Family Assaulted
  4. European Federation of Local Energy CompaniesClean Energy for All? On 10.10 Top-Level Speakers Present the Clean Energy Package
  5. UNICEFUp to Three Quarters of Children Face Abuse & Exploitation on Mediterranean Migration Routes
  6. Swedish EnterprisesEurope Under Challenge; Recipe for a Competitive EU
  7. European Public Health AllianceCall to International Action to Break Deadlock on Chronic Diseases Crisis
  8. CES - Silicones EuropePropelling the construction revolution with silicones
  9. EU2017EEEU 2018 Budget: A Case of Three Paradoxes
  10. ACCAUS 'Dash for Gas' Could Disrupt Global Gas Markets
  11. Swedish Enterprises“No Time to Lose” Film & Debate on How Business & Politics Can Fight Climate Change
  12. European Free AllianceSave The Date!! 26.09 - Coppieters Awards To... Carme Forcadell