Sunday

26th May 2019

Opinion

The EU investment plan: The good, the bad, and the ugly

  • Jean-Claude Juncker unveiled the plan soon after he became European Commission president (Photo: ec.europa.eu)

With modest economic growth, zero inflation, and declining public and private investments, European leaders are desperately trying to find ways to grow.

They will meet on December 18 and 19 to discuss and, hopefully, deliver on the so-called Junker Plan, a project to mobilise around €315 billion ($400 billion) in new investments over the course of the next three years.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

This will then create a specialised fund called the European Fund for Strategic Investments within the European Investment Bank (EIB).

This is part of a three pronged strategy: easing credit conditions and inflating prices through the European Central Bank, national structural reforms to be delivered by national governments, and stimulus to internal demand through additional investment.

The proposal cannot be easily written off as all “good” or all “bad” since it contains some positive elements, but many questions remain regarding how it will be implemented.

So, what is good, bad and ugly in this proposal?

The good

First the good. Most within Europe now realise that the euro crisis is not just a matter of dysfunctional markets but is also due to a lack of internal demand.

Structural reforms to make European markets and firms more competitive can deploy energies and act on the supply side of the economy, but in order to make them work, additional demand is needed.

The European Central Bank (ECB) can take action on inflation, but very little for economic growth. So a new investment plan is welcome, not only for the Europeans but also for the American business community that can find new investment opportunities.

Since the outset of the great recession, public and private investment in the EU dropped by 320 billion euros. With lower growth and lower public revenues, governments cut the easiest expenditure i.e. public investment. With tight credit conditions, high leverage ratios at the firm level, and overall lack of consumer confidence, the private sector halted investments.

The so called Junker Plan tries to put investment at the core of a strategy to re-launch the European economic potential.

The aim is to restore the same level that Europe had before the crisis. The strategy is to try to channel private sector resources toward initiatives that might have strong positive spillovers for employment and growth. In other words, governments are conscious of the budget constraints and are trying to develop a political economy strategy using private instead of public money.

The public arm is the European Investment Bank that, despite a largely public capital account, behaves as a private financial institution, assessing risks of loans and charging them consequently. The method is to leverage public money with private equity so that investment can largely (or totally) be financed by private investors.

The bad

Now the bad. While this strategy merits attention and support, national governments are clearly not committing to providing additional resources to increase investment, neither from the EU budget nor from governments’ budgets.

Also, there is nothing new in the Junker plan: most EU countries and the European Investment Bank already use the same financial tools to finance growth, such as public guarantees to private loans, public private partnerships (PPPs) for infrastructures or national development financial entities as KFW in Germany, Caisse des Depots in France or Cassa Depositi e Prestiti in Italy.

Finally, the ugly. The plan leaves many questions unanswered:

The ugly

First: Why will projects that need to be financed be proposed by national governments and chosen by the EIB, since cash will be almost totally private?

This risks there being a mismatch between what governments are willing to realise and what instead the private sector considers profitable.

Second: Will the new fund run the risk of compromising the credit rating of the EIB, currently triple-A? The EIB issues bonds to finance its activities and benefitted so far from a high reputation by the financial markets.

Third: Why is this fund different from already established initiatives of financial engineering already in place in Europe? Here the risk is a duplication of activities.

Fourth: Since money comes from the private sector, how will European institutions avoid that most projects will be financed in those countries that are more profitable due to their more successful economies, therefore increasing the gap between dynamic economies and sluggish ones?

Fifth: How long will the execution of the plan take, given the tight EU state-aid rules? Europeans are obsessed with state-aid rules to avoid unfair competition within the EU, and any project that benefits from some public support must follow certain criteria. All this can delay the whole process.

A quick response to these questions might transform a good idea into a concrete and impactful tool for the sluggish European economy.

Nevertheless, it important not to attach too many expectations to the Junker Plan solely, as is happening for the likely quantitative easing by the European Central Bank early next year.

A tangible result will materialise only if all these actions together change confidence and let Europeans firms start investing again, and foreign investors see Europe as a reliable place for the years ahead.

Andrea Montanino is director of the Atlantic Council’s Global Business and Economics Programme. He is the former executive director of the International Monetary Fund.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Ministers clash over Juncker fund

Germany’s finance minister warned that his government would not make extra contributions to the EU’s planned €300 billion investment vehicle, as ministers clashed on how the programme should be set up.

EU sanctions regime cannot be an 'EU Magnitsky Act'

The debate about the choice of name should not boil down to a political muscle show against Hungary, which opposes the reference to Magnitsky because of its political relations with the Russian government.

News in Brief

  1. Former EU climate chief cheered by 40,000 activists in Denmark
  2. UK's May announces June 7 resignation date
  3. Ireland votes for EU election and divorce referendum
  4. Report: May to announce resignation plan on Friday
  5. Leading politicians: time for EU to have female leaders
  6. Poll: Finland's Green party to surge in EU elections
  7. High demand for postal voting in Denmark
  8. Some EU citizens turned away at UK polling stations

Press freedom and the EU elections

We are campaigning for the next European Commission to appoint a commissioner with a clear mandate to take on the challenge of the protection of freedom, independence and diversity of journalism.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Vote for the EU Sutainable Energy AwardsCast your vote for your favourite EUSEW Award finalist. You choose the winner of 2019 Citizen’s Award.
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersEducation gets refugees into work
  3. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank
  4. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  5. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  6. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  7. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  11. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  12. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year

Latest News

  1. Turnout up in Slovakia, with pro-EU liberals scoring high
  2. Belgium votes in hybrid EU-national election
  3. Irish greens take Dublin in second EU exit poll
  4. EU election results to trigger top jobs scramble This WEEK
  5. Don't tell the Dutch - but Timmermans 'won'
  6. EU says goodbye to May with 'respect'
  7. Strache scandal: how big a hit will Austrian far-right take?
  8. Italy train row exposes competing views of EU

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic commitment to driving global gender equality
  2. International Partnership for Human RightsMeet your defender: Rasul Jafarov leading human rights defender from Azerbaijan
  3. UNICEFUNICEF Hosts MEPs in Jordan Ahead of Brussels Conference on the Future of Syria
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic talks on parental leave at the UN
  5. International Partnership for Human RightsTrial of Chechen prisoner of conscience and human rights activist Oyub Titiev continues.
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic food policy inspires India to be a sustainable superpower
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersMilestone for Nordic-Baltic e-ID
  8. Counter BalanceEU bank urged to free itself from fossil fuels and take climate leadership
  9. Intercultural Dialogue PlatformRoundtable: Muslim Heresy and the Politics of Human Rights, Dr. Matthew J. Nelson
  10. Platform for Peace and JusticeTurkey suffering from the lack of the rule of law
  11. UNESDASoft Drinks Europe welcomes Tim Brett as its new president
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers take the lead in combatting climate change

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us