Wednesday

2nd Dec 2020

Opinion

Why pro-Europeans should oppose the EU Constitution

The cheerleaders of the proposed EU constitution – including the 500 MEPs who voted in favour of it in Strasbourg this week – are putting the entire project of European co-operation in danger.

In their zeal for further integration, they risk driving a nationalistic wedge between member countries and could jeopardise the real benefits the EU has brought in terms of coming together to address the social and environmental problems that can only be tackled through international co-operation.

Risk of leaving public behind

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Until recently the EU has only changed and adapted at a pace which is acceptable to Europe’s citizens. But now, following a decade of rapid integration, the EU is in danger of leaving the public behind.

In the UK, hostility to the Constitution is very high. While the gap between the ‘yes’ and ‘no’ side will perhaps narrow as the referendum gets closer, it is clear that a very large number of people have severe reservations about the current direction that the EU is taking.

This is not only a British phenomenon. In the recent European parliamentary vote on the Constitution, a majority of MEPs from three EU member states voted against the Constitution. In other countries like Sweden and Malta, governments are denying the citizens a vote because voters might say ‘no’.

Opposition across the spectrum

This opposition to the Constitution cuts across the political spectrum.

From my perspective as a Green I dislike the fact that there will be an enhancement of the EU’s military capability. I do not feel that the EU needs an even greater role in the liberalisation of the service sector with all of the damage that could do to cherished public services around the EU.

I am also concerned about significant transfers of power from state, regional and local institutions to institutions that don’t have the same democratic credentials. This is especially true in foreign policy and defence, where scrutiny is minimal.

There are many reasons why people from many different political traditions have legitimate concerns about the content of the Constitution. That does not make them anti-Europeans, it just means that they do not like the detailed contents of this treaty.

As a pro European, I believe a strong and effective European Union to be central to solving many of the social and environmental challenges that we face. This constitution, however, is not the right vehicle to achieve it.

Risk of nationalism

We must accept that scepticism about future integration is a growing phenomenon in many EU member states – particularly in the UK.

However, if the governments and the EU continue to ignore the pressure from citizens then the healthy scepticism which I endorse could be turned into something more sinister.

A rejection of the internationalism implicit in European integration and a return to nationalism would be a disaster for Europe and the wider world. If the political class does not address the legitimate concerns of the sceptical public about the EU then nationalism could be the result.

Realising that a referendum fought on the issues is probably unwinnable, the pro-Constitution lobby is now saying that a British ‘no’ vote would mean expulsion from the EU. While that is patently untrue – Britain could not be ejected from the EU unless it voted for that to happen itself – it plays into the hands of those who wish to see the UK leave the EU.

We have a pro-European and anti-Constitution majority in the UK, but this tactic runs the real risk of turning an anti-Constitution majority into an anti-EU

majority.

Why Europe?

That is why pro-Europeans should oppose the Constitution. It is a flawed document that will alienate people from across the continent and across the political spectrum. If we are serious about re-engaging the public with this project then we need a fundamental revision of the role and purpose of the EU.

There’s little point in debating ‘more Europe’ or ‘less Europe’ until we have answered the prior question ‘why Europe’. In the short term we could implement some of the administrative changes that would make the EU run more smoothly after enlargement with a limited treaty.

That would give us time to think about exactly how we want the EU to integrate and answer some of the questions about the social and environmental content of the EU that were not answered by the Convention.

Dr Caroline Lucas is a Green Party MEP for South-East England and a member of the advisory board of the Centre for a Social Europe

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Why eurosceptics should vote for the Constitution

UK labour MEP Richard Corbett says he is puzzled why genuinely moderate eurosceptics should object to the new Constitution. He argues that the changes the Constitution contains address the most common eurosceptic complaints.

EU's opportunity to curb online politics ads

Beyond privacy, the EU should equalise political party access to online ads and improve the oversight of digital campaigning. It can borrow from how governments have curbed big money in politics.

The under-reported power struggle at the top of the OSCE

An internal power struggle has undermined the world's leading international security body since the summer. The OSCE is due to finally get new leaders in December but the unprecedented power vacuum has hit at a crunch time for hotspots worldwide.

The human cost of whistleblowing

The fate of Jonathan Taylor, a British whistleblower stuck in legal limbo in Croatia, is a test of European laws designed to protect those who put themselves at risk for the common good.

EU vs US tech agenda under Biden

What will the new Joe Biden administration bring to the realm of digital policy, and how will it affect the relationship with the EU?

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic climate debate on 17 November!
  2. UNESDAMaking healthier diets the easy choice
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersUN Secretary General to meet with Nordic Council on COVID-19
  4. UNESDAWell-designed Deposit Return Schemes can help reach Single-Use Plastics Directive targets
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council meets Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tichanovskaja
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region to invest DKK 250 million in green digitalised business sector

Latest News

  1. EU law needed to protect free press, NGOs say
  2. Socialists demand resignation of EU border-agency chief
  3. Orbán ally admits he was at Brussels lockdown 'sex party'
  4. Legal battle over oil giant Shell's emissions begins
  5. Chance for Christian Democrats to draw line against extremism
  6. Frontex takes transparency activists to EU court
  7. EU's opportunity to curb online politics ads
  8. China and Russia encircling divided Western allies

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us