Saturday

31st Oct 2020

Infrastructure rules threaten alternative fuels bill

The debate in Brussels over how to develop viable alternatives to petrol and diesel boils down to a version of an age-old question: what comes first, the chicken or the egg?

The conundrum facing lawmakers is that motorists do not buy electric or gas powered vehicles for the simple reason that it is too inconvenient to charge or fill up their tank. Meanwhile, companies do not invest in new filling stations or charge points because there is not enough demand.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • Commission plans could see electric charge points and filling stations in Europe's most remote areas (Photo: EUobserver)

Resolving this question is one of the aims of the draft directive on alternative fuels currently being discussed by MEPs and ministers.

But the legislation is in danger of falling into the unwanted category of files that governments agree with in principle, but object to in practice.

The most contentious item relates to the requirement for minimum infrastructure targets.

Under the plan published by the EU executive in March, by 2020 the directive would require: hydrogen refuelling points every 300km, liquefied natural gas (LNG) filling stations every 400km; fuelling points for compressed natural gas (CNG) every 100km, and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) points every 150km.

Nearly all member states are worried that the bill could force them to push large sums of public investment into building an infrastructure network for which there is no market demand. They are also sceptical of the notion that building the network will inevitably lead to more customers using alternative fuels.

For his part, Carlos Fidanza, the Italian centre-right deputy charged with drafting parliament's position, wants to go further by adding targets for LPG and linking the infrastructure requirements to population.

Under his plan, one filling station for Hydrogen, LPG and CNG would be needed per 250,000, 150,000 and 100,000 people respectively.

Like the EU executive, MEPs say that the alternative fuels market, which accounts for less than 10 percent of transport fuels, cannot develop without infrastructure.

“If we want to give certainty to investors then we have to set binding targets at national level,” Fidanza said at a recent breakfast hearing with lobbyists and lawmakers, adding that “we are at the crucial point in the negotiations with council (member states)."

Fidanza added that he had chosen to go beyond the commission target for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and that the parliament's transport committee had agreed that “we need to establish an LPG network across the EU.”

Critics say that this 'one-size-fits-all' approach would result in filling stations being built in remote areas of Sweden and Finland where population density is amongst the lowest in the world. Meanwhile, gas and electricity provision would still be insufficient to cope with demand in cities.

Both the commission and parliament say that the plans are not intended to impose new costs on governments, arguing that private sector investment and EU cohesion funds should be able to cover the costs.

Financial incentives are needed to attract enough investment to take the strain from the public purse, argues Jeffrey Seisler.

Chief executive of Clean Fuel Consulting, a Washington DC and Brussels-based lobby group, Seisler also warns that the timeframe for implementation is “unrealistic and won't be met.”

A council official working on the file told this website that if the parliament continues to insist on binding targets, governments will “dig their own trenches” in opposition, dimming the prospects of a compromise.

Leaving the targets as drafted by the commission in the annex of the bill is “out of the question,” the official added, although a possible compromise could involve negotiating targets for each individual member state.

But with next May's European elections rapidly approaching, it is MEPs who are most anxious to get the directive on the statute books before the end of the legislative term.

The transport committee will adopt its negotiating position on the file in November. For their part, governments have only recently begun their discussions on the directive and are not expected to agree a negotiating mandate before mid-December.

It is this factor that could see the parliament blink first.

Dim prospects for EU energy tax reform

The logic behind a European Commission's proposal on energy taxation is based on the concept of "fuel neutrality" but it could hurt alternative fuels the most.

Alternative fuels overview

Politicians say that Europe's reliance on imported oil damages the environment and leaves car-owners at the mercy of speculators. But are there viable alternatives? In this series, EUobserver examines whether alternative fuels can compete with the petrol pump.

MEPs agree cap on crop-based biofuels

The EU parliament has capped the amount of crop-based biofuels that can be used to reach EU energy targets amid environmental fears.

News in Brief

  1. Polish government rows back on abortion ruling
  2. EU threatens legal action against Poland on rule of law
  3. 'Several dead' after earthquake hits Greece and Turkey
  4. Hungary faces EU court over asylum restrictions
  5. Polish PM urges end to abortion protests to 'protect elderly'
  6. EU to fund cross-border hospital transfers
  7. Some 140 migrants drown on way to Spanish islands
  8. EU central bank preparing new rescue measures

EU Commission unveils 'adequate minimum wage' plan

The European Commission proposed minimum standards to ensure adequate minimum wages all across the EU. But the proposal does not oblige member states to harmonise their systems, nor does it set a common minimum wage level.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking healthier diets the easy choice
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersUN Secretary General to meet with Nordic Council on COVID-19
  3. UNESDAWell-designed Deposit Return Schemes can help reach Single-Use Plastics Directive targets
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council meets Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tichanovskaja
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region to invest DKK 250 million in green digitalised business sector
  6. UNESDAReducing packaging waste – a huge opportunity for circularity

Latest News

  1. Nice attack: EU urges world leaders to stop hate speech
  2. Europe is back in (partial) lockdown
  3. Gender equality still 60 years away, warns study
  4. I'm an 'election observer' - but what do we actually do?
  5. Deal in reach on linking EU funds to rule of law
  6. EU Commission's Covid-19 expert offers bleak outlook
  7. Belgium's collaboration with Sudan's secret service: my story
  8. What do ordinary Belarusians want from the EU?

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us