Thursday

27th Jun 2019

Icesave vote a threat to global finance?

  • "With only days left until the scheduled vote on the fate of the Icesave proposal, no one knows if it will actually go ahead" (Photo: European Commission)

The people of Iceland face the prospect of a referendum on the deal their government cut with the UK and the Netherlands in the wake of the Icesave collapse. Even though the deal is out of date. More favourable repayment terms have already been offered than those in the bill that may or may not be put to the ballot.

Many commentators think it could constitute a threat to the entire global financial system if people are allowed to vote their way out of massive debt.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

A notice hangs on the wall in a sports centre near Reykjavik. The centre will be closed on Saturday 6 March if a referendum is held on that day. With only days left until the scheduled vote on the fate of the Icesave proposal, no one knows if it will actually go ahead.

Few things shed as much light on the situation in Iceland as this notice. There might be a vote, but nobody has a clue what will happen if there is not. Will a new deal with the British and the Dutch see the vote called off? Will it be postponed to allow time to cut a deal? Will a better outcome be feasible once the votes have been counted, especially now that polls suggest the proposal will be rejected?

Is it true, as is rumoured, that the British would prefer it if the people of Iceland didn't vote on Icesave, since a popular mandate would strengthen Iceland's hand at the negotiating table? If that is the case, then at least Britain and Iceland agree on something – even if it is only that both consider the referendum a very bad idea indeed.

Government under pressure

Post-referendum, the government would find itself in the peculiar situation of the people having rejected a bill in which it has invested a great deal of effort and credibility. No surprise, then, that talk of a political crisis has become so loud that talk of the financial crisis that triggered it is now barely audible.

As with most elections, postal votes can be submitted for several weeks prior to polling day. Postal voters are usually a very specific category. After all, not everyone is able to turn up at a polling station on the appointed day. This time around, postal voters are asking if their votes will ever actually be counted – and they are not alone

Some people who are perfectly capable of making it to a polling station on the day are also demanding a postal vote. They want to make sure their opinion counts, whatever that opinion may be. They don't want to be cheated out of a referendum if the authorities get their way and find a justification for calling it off.

New deal sought in London

So why a referendum? Late last year, the Icelandic parliament passed a bill about Icesave's debt commitments after the British and Dutch rejected Icelandic reservations about the deal struck by the three states in the autumn. The reservations were financial in nature: the deal specified the amounts and times of repayments, despite the state of flux in which the Icelandic economy found itself.

The deal, which was totally in line with British and Dutch thinking, was put to the President. Early this year, he announced that he would refuse to ratify it, a stance backed by the signatures of around a quarter of the electorate. The ball was back in the government's court. It had to decide what to do with this piece of legislation. The opinion polls suggested that the people had already made up their minds.

The necessity of reaching a new deal with the British and Dutch has been discussed ever since the President made his call. Signs of progress have emerged in the last few days, with the British and Dutch responding to a new Icelandic proposal with a counter-proposal of their own – one they claimed was their final offer.

Iceland had stressed that assets from the Landsbankinn bankruptcy settlement should be used to repay Icesave debts. The British and Dutch wanted to hold the Icelandic state responsible for those repayments. To sweeten the pill, they offered variable interest rates this time, instead of the fixed 5.5% stipulated in the deal being put to the referendum.

This offer was initially described as final until Iceland rejected it – or at least until Icelandic representatives arrived in London for new talks at the behest of the British government. This time, the Dutch looked on from the sidelines, with most observers agreeing that their absence had more to do with the collapse of their own government than any reluctance to negotiate. Iceland has submitted a new proposal, based, it says, on ensuring that the British and Dutch do not make money on Icesave by charging excessive interest rates.

Media changes tone

The tone of overseas media coverage of the Icelandic stance has changed radically in recent weeks. The presidential veto caused many to reflect on the implacability of the British and Dutch approach. On Friday 26 February, the Financial Times published an unusually caustic editorial, slating the British authorities for taking an unnecessarily tough line and for their ‘grotesque mishandling' of the whole affair.

According to the FT, the focus on Iceland's responsibility has diverted attention away from the reality that European banking regulations are not designed to cope with large-scale international bank failures.

Many commentators connect the editorial with the British resumption of negotiations the very next day. It is believed that the British team fears a chain reaction across Europe if the Icelandic referendum rejects the deal.

According to the FT, if Iceland is deemed to be the main culprit but rejects responsibility, investors would no longer consider state bankruptcy to be quite so inconceivable. The wrath of the Icelanders, as the editorial describes it, might encourage the people of other countries to refuse to repay debts for which others bear the real responsibility.

Government held hostage by opposition

An extraordinary situation has now arisen, in which Icelanders want to vote on a deal that nobody actually intends to go through with.

The British and Dutch have already offered more favourable terms than those stipulated in the referendum bill. So won't everybody want to reject the old deal, secure in the knowledge that a better one is in the offing?

Well, not everyone, it would seem. Not the Minister of Finance, for example. He will vote for the worst of two possible outcomes, despite acknowledging that the referendum is past its sell-by date now that a better offer is on the table.

It is a difficult attitude to understand – perhaps he is unwilling to sever emotional ties with a bill upon which he placed such exaggerated emphasis, but it is far more likely that he just does not actually expect to have to cast his vote.

Þorsteinn Pálsson, a former prime minister and ambassador to London, fails to see how rejecting the deal in a referendum is supposed to strengthen Iceland's position. On 28 February, he said that the right thing to do would be to cancel the referendum and simply declare the law invalid.

In any event, a new deal would render the law irrelevant. After all, the British and Dutch have already made a better offer, and the opposition in Iceland now has the final say on any new deal. The British and Dutch have made political unity in Iceland a precondition, knowing full well that the government lacks the strength to push through a deal on its own. A political crisis of this nature shows up weakness, not strength.

High-level hypocrisy

Professor Harry Mintzberg (Canada) joined in the chorus of criticism of the UK and the Netherlands with an article in one of the Icelandic papers on 1 March. He described the Icesave case as ‘oppression' and said that it was ‘hypocritical' to hold the people of Iceland responsible for losses on a venture from which they would not have profited if all had gone well. He called on the people of Iceland to vote ‘no' in the name of the free market, capitalism and internationalisation.

Naturally, the British don't want the Icelanders to throw out the December Icesave bill in a referendum. That could lead to the very situation the FT warned about: People power turning against governments all over the world for pumping money into failed banks.

The Icelandic government doesn't want the referendum either, as it faces defeat on one of its flagship policies. How can it cling to power having held a referendum while working towards a new and better deal?

In the meantime, the ordinary man and woman in the Icelandic street still want the opportunity the make their feelings known in a practical way – by exercising their democratic right to vote.

Ragnhildur Sverrisdóttir is Icelandic journalist and her article first appeared in the Nordic Council of Ministers' newsletter "Analys Norden". All views expressed are those of the author. Translation by: Tam McTurk

EU top court backs Canada trade deal in ruling

The European Court of Justice ruled on Tuesday that the EU-Canada free trade agreement, and its controversial dispute settlement mechanism, is in line with the bloc's rules.

EU and Japan in delicate trade talks

The Japanese PM comes to Brussels to discuss the first results of the new EU-Japan free trade deal, plus WTO reform - a sensitive topic before he moves onto Washington to face Donald Trump.

News in Brief

  1. EU warns Turkey as 'Gezi Park' trials begin
  2. EU universities to share students, curricula
  3. Migrant rescue ship loses Human Rights Court appeal
  4. Denmark completes social democrat sweep of Nordics
  5. Johnson offers 'do or die' pledge on Brexit
  6. Weber indirectly attacks Macron in newspaper op-ed
  7. EU to sign free trade deal with Vietnam
  8. EU funding of air traffic control 'largely unnecessary'

Feature

Romania enlists priests to promote euro switchover plan

Romania is due to join the single currency in 2024 - despite currently only meeting one of the four criteria. Now the government in Bucharest is enlisting an unlikely ally to promote the euro to the public: the clergy.

Trump and Kurz: not best friends, after all

The visit of Austrian chancellor Sebastian Kurz to the White House on Wednesday showed that the current rift in transatlantic relations is deepening by the day.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. International Partnership for Human RightsEU-Uzbekistan Human Rights Dialogue: EU to raise key fundamental rights issues
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNo evidence that social media are harmful to young people
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersCanada to host the joint Nordic cultural initiative 2021
  4. Vote for the EU Sutainable Energy AwardsCast your vote for your favourite EUSEW Award finalist. You choose the winner of 2019 Citizen’s Award.
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersEducation gets refugees into work
  6. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank
  7. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  8. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  9. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  10. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate

Latest News

  1. EU moves to end car-testing 'confidentiality clause'
  2. EU parliament gives extra time for leaders on top jobs
  3. Europe's rights watchdog lifts Russia sanctions
  4. EU-Vietnam trade deal a bad day for workers' rights
  5. EU 'special envoy' going to US plan for Palestine
  6. Polish judicial reforms broke EU law, court says
  7. EU study: no evidence of 'East vs West' food discrimination
  8. Russia tried to stir up Irish troubles, US think tank says

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  2. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  3. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic commitment to driving global gender equality
  5. International Partnership for Human RightsMeet your defender: Rasul Jafarov leading human rights defender from Azerbaijan
  6. UNICEFUNICEF Hosts MEPs in Jordan Ahead of Brussels Conference on the Future of Syria
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic talks on parental leave at the UN
  8. International Partnership for Human RightsTrial of Chechen prisoner of conscience and human rights activist Oyub Titiev continues.
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic food policy inspires India to be a sustainable superpower
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersMilestone for Nordic-Baltic e-ID
  11. Counter BalanceEU bank urged to free itself from fossil fuels and take climate leadership
  12. Intercultural Dialogue PlatformRoundtable: Muslim Heresy and the Politics of Human Rights, Dr. Matthew J. Nelson

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Platform for Peace and JusticeTurkey suffering from the lack of the rule of law
  2. UNESDASoft Drinks Europe welcomes Tim Brett as its new president
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers take the lead in combatting climate change
  4. Counter BalanceEuropean Parliament takes incoherent steps on climate in future EU investments
  5. International Partnership For Human RightsKyrgyz authorities have to immediately release human rights defender Azimjon Askarov
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersSeminar on disability and user involvement
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersInternational appetite for Nordic food policies
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Nordic Innovation House in Hong Kong
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region has chance to become world leader when it comes to start-ups
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersTheresa May: “We will not be turning our backs on the Nordic region”
  11. International Partnership for Human RightsOpen letter to Emmanuel Macron ahead of Uzbek president's visit
  12. International Partnership for Human RightsRaising key human rights concerns during visit of Turkmenistan's foreign minister

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us