Friday

18th Oct 2019

EU targets Germany and UK for not fining VW's emissions fraud

  • The European Commission says the German government has not done enough to punish Volkswagen for its emissions fraud (Photo: Bundesregierung/Kugler)

The European Commission fulfilled an overdue promise on Thursday (8 December) by taking legal action against EU member states that have not done enough to deter or punish carmakers for cheating on emissions tests.

The commission has sent a so-called letter of formal notice to seven member states, which have two months to reply.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

  • Bienkowska: national authorities 'must ensure that car manufacturers actually comply with the law'. (Photo: European Commission)

If the commission remains unsatisfied, it can continue in the infringement procedure, which could end up at the Court of Justice of the EU, and eventually lead to fines for the member states.

However, it is unclear why some countries are targeted, but others are not.

The commission has targeted seven EU member states: the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Spain and the United Kingdom.

“Abiding by the law is first and foremost the duty of car manufacturers,” said EU industry commissioner Elzbieta Bienkowska in a press release.

“But national authorities across the EU must ensure that car manufacturers actually comply with the law.”

The commission said that Germany, Luxembourg, Spain and the UK failed to penalise Volkswagen Group (VW) for the use of illegal emissions cheating software.

These four countries had issued certificates to diesel cars which turned out to have illegal defeat devices - a fact that was made public in September 2015.

Only the country where a car certificate, or type approval, was issued, can take action against a cheating car company.

So far, however, VW has not been criminally prosecuted for using defeat devices.

Recall is also 'a penalty'

At a recent hearing in the European Parliament, Ekhard Zinke, the president of the German Federal Motor Transport Authority said recalls were penalty enough.

“I regard it as a penalty if a manufacturer is told that they can no longer trade particular products on the market in their present form,” said Zinke.

Germany and the UK also “broke the law by refusing to disclose, when requested by the commission, all the technical information gathered in their national investigations” undertaken after the VW scandal became public.

Both countries had published a report in April which showed that many carmakers used defeat devices, but the authors of the reports said that carmakers cited an exemption in the legislation.

The commission wants to double-check the carmakers' story, and not take their claim that the use of defeat devices was legal, at face value.

Why Lithuania and not Denmark?

The commission is also targeting Czech Republic, Lithuania and Greece for not having implemented any penalties for the use of defeat devices.

According to rules agreed by all member states in 2007, national governments would lay down “effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties” to deter the use of cheating software.

The three countries “failed to introduce such penalties systems into their national law”.

But the choice of these three countries is unclear.

The penalty Lithuania has put in place is withdrawal of the type approval, but no fine, which one could argue is not “effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties”.

But Denmark also does not have any fines in place. It is not clear why the Nordic country is not targeted.

Also, the inclusion of the Czech Republic is notable.

According to a European Commission staff working document, published last January, the Czech Republic had the highest theoretical fine available to emissions cheaters: €1.85 million.

However, a commission source said that this potential penalty relates to the general legislation on type approvals, and not to emissions cheating specifically.

“The commission considers the provisions put into place to be insufficient,” the contact said.

A second EU commission official told EUobserver that the commission is still gathering information from 14 member states about their penalties systems, including Denmark, Italy and France.

Thursday's step had been promised by commissioner Bienkowska, who had previously told MEPs the commission would “definitely” take legal action before the end of October.

Missed opportunity in 2013

Commission spokeswoman Lucia Caudet told journalists on Thursday that the Commission could not have taken legal action sooner, because the commission “in the spirit of good cooperation” first wanted to engage in a dialogue with member states.

“When we really consider that the level of response is not satisfactory, then we take legal action. But it is not something which can be done in a more rushed manner,” she said.

The EU commission had the opportunity to take legal action against member states in 2013, when the executive was led by Jose Manuel Barroso.

The commission had asked member states whether they had implemented the penalty provisions, and received responses from 18 member states, including three countries now targeted: Lithuania, Spain, and the UK.

But the commission then did not decide to follow-up, nor did it pressure the other countries that had failed to reply to the commission's request.

Investigation

Emissions cheats face tiny fines in some EU states

Fines for car firms that cheat tests in the EU range from €7 million to €1,000. EU commission itself unsure to what extent states complied with rules on "dissuasive" penalties.

Investigation

Fiat may face €80 fine over emissions cheating

The Italian carmaker is accused of using an emissions-cheating software, but a recent Italian letter to Brussels shows that the potential fine is minuscule.

Investigation

Commission delays legal action on car emissions

EU industry commissioner Bienkowska had promised there would "definitely" be infringement procedures against countries that failed to make car manufacturers follow EU rules.

News in Brief

  1. Macron: Nato's inability to react to Turkey a 'mistake'
  2. EU: US can expect counter measures after tariff move
  3. Almost 7,500 people forcibly returned to Libya in 2019
  4. Puigdemont released after responding to arrest warrant
  5. Commission: Facebook's Libra needs international approach
  6. Italian PM: denial of accession talks a 'historic mistake'
  7. Catalan president blames clashes on 'infiltrators'
  8. US imposes €6.7bn new tariffs on European products

Greens commit to air quality 'super commissioner'

Following an investigation into the Dieselgate scandal, the European Parliament recommended a single commissioner should be responsible for both air quality and setting industrial standards. But only the Greens want to commit to carry out that advice.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersBrussels welcomes Nordic culture
  2. UNESDAUNESDA appoints Nicholas Hodac as Director General
  3. UNESDASoft drinks industry co-signs Circular Plastics Alliance Declaration
  4. FEANIEngineers Europe Advisory Group: Building the engineers of the future
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNew programme studies infectious diseases and antibiotic resistance
  6. UNESDAUNESDA reduces added sugars 11.9% between 2015-2017
  7. International Partnership for Human RightsEU-Uzbekistan Human Rights Dialogue: EU to raise key fundamental rights issues
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNo evidence that social media are harmful to young people
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersCanada to host the joint Nordic cultural initiative 2021
  10. Vote for the EU Sutainable Energy AwardsCast your vote for your favourite EUSEW Award finalist. You choose the winner of 2019 Citizen’s Award.
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersEducation gets refugees into work
  12. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  2. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  3. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  4. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  8. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  9. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic commitment to driving global gender equality
  11. International Partnership for Human RightsMeet your defender: Rasul Jafarov leading human rights defender from Azerbaijan
  12. UNICEFUNICEF Hosts MEPs in Jordan Ahead of Brussels Conference on the Future of Syria

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us