19th Aug 2019


Inside the secret EU talks on the future of car emissions

  • Centre-left Maltese MEP Miriam Dalli (l) negotiated on the new EU rules for CO2 emissions of cars and vans. A majority of MEPs had wanted a 40 percent reduction target - much higher than the 30 percent proposed by EU commissioner Miguel Arias Canete (r) (Photo: European Parliament)

Even when EU politicians clash bitterly about draft legislation in talks behind closed doors, they do so in formal language and in a civilised plenary format.

The three-way negotiations between the European Parliament, the Council of the EU, and the European Commission, known as trilogues, may be held outside the public eye – but there is still plenty room for diplomatic courtesy.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

  • Cars should emit 37.5 percent less CO2 in 2030, compared with 2021 (Photo: European Parliament)

"We highly appreciate the contribution given by 'blah blah blah'," would be a typical beginning of a contribution, jokes Finnish liberal MEP Nils Torvalds.

"Partly, it's tradition. Partly, it's a way of concealing that you are actually playing a tough game, but you are playing a tough game according to the diplomatic niceties," Torvalds told EUobserver in an interview.

"You push a knife between the fifth and the sixth rib and you say: 'oh, my dear friend!'," he added.

The Finnish politician was closely involved in the trilogue talks about new CO2 reduction targets for cars and vans – representing his political Alde family as a so-called shadow rapporteur.

The outcome of those talks, a complicated compromise between the different positions, is being put to a vote in Strasbourg on Wednesday (27 March).

It will require auto-manufacturers to have reduced their cars' CO2 emissions in 2030 by 37.5 percent, compared with 2021. Their vans' emissions should be reduced by 31 percent in the same timescale.

The bill also foresees complex incentive schemes to promote the production of zero-emission vehicles.

Intense lobbying

How did the final result come about?

It was a hard-fought compromise and one of the most intensely-lobbied files of 2018.

Miriam Dalli, the Maltese centre-left MEP who negotiated as rapporteur with the other two EU institutions on parliament's behalf, held at least 130 bilateral meetings with lobbyists from all kinds of sectors - not only the powerful car lobby, but also 'Big Oil' and other fuel companies, parts suppliers, and environmental lobbyists.

They not only knock on the door of Dalli's office though, she said.

"They reach out to other members, so other MEPs then put pressure on you," said Dalli. "Luckily enough, we were prepared for it. We knew it was coming."

However, much lobbying work is done far in advance, with lobbyists then letting representatives of national governments do the dirty work during the trilogue period, according to MEP Torvalds.

"I think the lobbyists are intelligent enough to understand that if they are trying to be very heavy-handed in a very touchy moment of the trilogue, then that can backfire heavily," he said.

Austrian reluctance?

The draft regulation was published by the commission in November 2017.

The parliament and council - representing national governments - reached their respective positions on the draft in early October 2018, followed quickly by the first trilogue meeting on 10 October.

The council's position is always defended by the country which holds the rotating presidency of the EU, which during those six months was Austria.

According to several MEPs, Austria was very reluctant to give up anything – sticking to the agreement reached between member states and constantly saying no.

"Ultimately in a negotiation you have two co-legislators. They both need to move," Dalli said.

During the second and third trilogue, the Austrian presidency did not want to discuss the political hot potatoes, she added, which meant that not much progress was made towards a conclusion.

"The second one and third one were in my view a lost opportunity," she said.

The Austrian EU ambassador was not available for interview, but a spokeswoman for the Austrian permanent representation in Brussels explained that "every presidency is bound by a mandate", i.e. the position agreed by member states in the council.

She stressed that progress was made "in each trilogue".

Then, on 10 December, the fourth trilogue meeting was scheduled for 9PM, in Strasbourg. The idea was that a deal would be reached at this meeting.

The commission had proposed that by 2030, the CO2 emissions of cars and vans have to be reduced by 30 percent compared to 2021. The council proposed to raise that figure for cars to 35 percent, but the parliament wanted 40 percent.

But Dalli was not getting anywhere.

"I was trying to approach council with different scenarios and trying to reach compromises, asking for movement on the percentages, and the only reply I was getting was no," she said.

"You have your position, we have our position – you can't end up in a position where everyone says no," said Dalli.

She thought that the Austrian presidency's strategy was to try to make parliament concede, under the pressure that it was the last scheduled trilogue – Christmas was around the corner.

And after New Year's, it would be Romania at the helm of the EU presidency – and pressing issues like Brexit and the May EU elections would be a distraction.

This argument had some fertile ground among centre-right and conservative MEPs, who wanted to conclude a deal that night.

Did Dalli pull the plug?

But according to Dalli and several other MEPs, she decided to pull out of the talks.

"We can't move if you don't move," said Dalli.

"The council didn't show any room for manoeuvre," said Eleonora Evi, MEP for the Italian Five Star Movement.

The shadow rapporteurs from the European People's Party (EPP) and the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) – whose positions were closer to the commission's proposal (i,e. with less strict targets) – had wanted to continue negotiating.

"Miriam Dalli played a big role - her decision was to stop negotiation there, and not give everything away," said Evi.

Julia Poliscanova, an environmental lobbyist at the Brussels-based Transport & Environment network, said she agreed with Dalli's decision "to walk away".

Poliscanova, who followed the negotiations closely - but from the outside - said the Austrians at one point offered a 37 percent reduction target, but that the MEPs had to agree to adopt the council's position on all other elements.

"It seemed that Austrians really did not understand the rules of genuine negotiation," she said.

Poliscanova summarised the proposal as giving MEPs two percentage points in exchange for "shutting up".

"I would also walk out if I was Miriam. Those two percent do not balance everything that is lost," she said.

But ECR member John Procter, a British MEP, remembered it differently.

"This idea that the rapporteur held her ground and stopped the deal happening - just wasn't the case. That wasn't what happened at all," he said.

"There were certain key crucial member states who had a string of red lines, and they would not move from those red lines. … It wasn't the rapporteur who said 'well, we'll pull out', it was the council who said very clearly: we cannot move further."

Those key member states were car-industry-minded Germany and the four central and eastern European states known as the Visegrad Four (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia).

These countries constituted a so-called blocking minority.

There is a strong correlation between the countries that made up the blocking minority and whether that country depends on a significant share of Europe's car industry jobs. Map produced by the European Data Journalism Network (EDJNet), for an EUobserver article originally published in November 2018.

When liberal MEP Torvalds heard the Austrian presidency argue MEPs would not get a better deal under the Romanian presidency, "what you could hear was a German voice in the background: we will keep this blocking minority".

This led to frustration among the EU countries that wanted more ambitious targets.

Already ahead of the third trilogue, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Sweden called on the Austrians to move in the direction of the parliament, in a confidential paper dated 28 November 2018, and seen by this website.

But according to sources in the parliament as well as a diplomatic source, these more ambitious countries were not kept in the loop by Austria.

"Some of the member states were coming to me directly, complaining about a lack of transparency on how things were moving," said MEP Dalli.

"We got the feeling that the Austrians all along the way were just taking the line of the Germans," she added.

The Austrian spokeswoman saw it differently.

"During the ensuing negotiation process with the European parliament the Austrian presidency has kept all member states informed and engaged through the regular procedures but also during the negotiations when necessary," she said.

A week after the fourth trilogue broke down, a fifth was scheduled and a deal was reached.

It is difficult to establish what exactly changed between those two meetings that allowed an agreement.

"Negotiations don't go like: I give you this, you give me this. It's a package at the end," said Dalli.

Cars and vans treated differently

For example, while the commission had proposed a 30 percent reduction target for both cars and vans - and parliament proposed 40 percent - the council wanted to have different targets: 30 percent for vans and 35 percent for cars.

"We knew that there was a number of member states that were adamant about having this differentiation. If this differentiation wasn't in place, it would have jeopardised the whole package," said Dalli.

The final reduction percentage for cars, 37.5 percent, was not based on a specific scientific rationale, but simply was the exact middle point where the two sides could meet each other.

EU diplomats meeting in the council agreed to the outcome in January.

"This is proof that the final text was a balanced compromise amongst all differing points of view," said the Austrian spokeswoman.

"All parties involved worked together to do their utmost to achieve this important aim for the environment," she added.

And how did the other institutions convince EU climate action commissioner Miguel Arias Canete, who had consistently defended a substantially lower reduction target of 30 percent, this website asked at a press conference in December 2018?

"The decision to go for higher targets belongs to the co-legislators. They don't have to convince me. They have to reach an agreement," said Canete.

"I will never be an obstacle for an agreement which is more ambitious," he added.

MEPs back stricter CO2 levels for cars after nail-biter vote

The European Parliament voted on Wednesday on draft legislation that will determine the CO2 emission reductions required by 2030. Where the EU commission had proposed a 30 percent cut, MEPs opted for a 40 percent reduction.

Commission 'non-paper' on car CO2 levels backfires

The European Commission published additional information on its proposal for new regulations on cars' CO2 levels - a week before the European Parliament was due to vote on it. Lead MEP Miriam Dalli is not amused.

News in Brief

  1. Trump turned down: Greenland not for sale
  2. UK Libdems would back Clarke or Harman as new PM
  3. Six countries agree to take 'Open Arms' ship migrants
  4. Gibraltar judge: Iranian ship should be released
  5. Increasing fears of a global recession
  6. Far-right hate crimes on the rise in Germany
  7. EU steel tariffs have 'worked well' so far
  8. Italian court: Migrant rescue ship can enter Italian waters

Greens commit to air quality 'super commissioner'

Following an investigation into the Dieselgate scandal, the European Parliament recommended a single commissioner should be responsible for both air quality and setting industrial standards. But only the Greens want to commit to carry out that advice.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAUNESDA reduces added sugars 11.9% between 2015-2017
  2. International Partnership for Human RightsEU-Uzbekistan Human Rights Dialogue: EU to raise key fundamental rights issues
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNo evidence that social media are harmful to young people
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCanada to host the joint Nordic cultural initiative 2021
  5. Vote for the EU Sutainable Energy AwardsCast your vote for your favourite EUSEW Award finalist. You choose the winner of 2019 Citizen’s Award.
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersEducation gets refugees into work
  7. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank
  8. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  9. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  10. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  11. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North

Latest News

  1. Selmayr did not keep formal records of lobby meetings
  2. EU asked to solve migrant rescue deadlock
  3. Internal EU paper: Second Brexit vote was no longer 'distant dream'
  4. EU has 'zero incentive' to break open 'trilogue' deals
  5. Denmark plans import ban on EU-approved pesticide
  6. US offers Johnson helping hand on Brexit
  7. Italy: New government without Salvini in the making
  8. Brexit row delays financial products transparency review

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  3. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  4. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic commitment to driving global gender equality
  6. International Partnership for Human RightsMeet your defender: Rasul Jafarov leading human rights defender from Azerbaijan
  7. UNICEFUNICEF Hosts MEPs in Jordan Ahead of Brussels Conference on the Future of Syria
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic talks on parental leave at the UN
  9. International Partnership for Human RightsTrial of Chechen prisoner of conscience and human rights activist Oyub Titiev continues.
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic food policy inspires India to be a sustainable superpower
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersMilestone for Nordic-Baltic e-ID
  12. Counter BalanceEU bank urged to free itself from fossil fuels and take climate leadership

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Intercultural Dialogue PlatformRoundtable: Muslim Heresy and the Politics of Human Rights, Dr. Matthew J. Nelson
  2. Platform for Peace and JusticeTurkey suffering from the lack of the rule of law
  3. UNESDASoft Drinks Europe welcomes Tim Brett as its new president
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers take the lead in combatting climate change
  5. Counter BalanceEuropean Parliament takes incoherent steps on climate in future EU investments
  6. International Partnership For Human RightsKyrgyz authorities have to immediately release human rights defender Azimjon Askarov
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersSeminar on disability and user involvement
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersInternational appetite for Nordic food policies
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Nordic Innovation House in Hong Kong
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region has chance to become world leader when it comes to start-ups
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersTheresa May: “We will not be turning our backs on the Nordic region”
  12. International Partnership for Human RightsOpen letter to Emmanuel Macron ahead of Uzbek president's visit

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us