Ombudsman slams EU bank watchdog for 'revolving doors'
The EU's banking watchdog should never have allowed its former head to become the chief executive of one of the world's largest financial lobby groups, according to the European Ombusdman.
The verdict against the European Banking Authority (EBA) concerns Adam Farkas, who participated at a board meeting that glossed over the largest money-laundering scandal ever known in Europe.
Join EUobserver today
Become an expert on Europe
Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.
Choose your plan
... or subscribe as a group
Already a member?
Farkas was EBA's executive director from 2011 until he was hired by the Brussels-based Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME), a job he started in February this year.
The association represents some of the world's largest banks. Last year, it spent up to €4.7m lobbying the EU.
"If this move did not justify using the option, provided under EU law, to forbid someone from moving to such a role, then no move would," said European Ombusdman Emily O'Reilly on Monday (11 May).
O'Reilly said the EBA had also failed, once notified of the move, to immediately withdraw Farkas' access to confidential information.
Asked to comment, the EBA said they are confident that the restrictions imposed on Farkas "to limit the conflict of interest were commensurate and proportionate."
Those restrictions included not allowing him to meet in a professional capacity his former subordinates for two years.
Moving from a position of public institutional power to a private one that then seeks to exert influence over legislation is commonly known as a 'revolving door.'
Previous such conflicts of interest have also implicated the European Commission, whose former president José Manuel Barroso took a senior post at Goldman Sachs International.
April: Farkas and Danske Bank
The EBA was set up to address the role of banking institutions, such as Goldman Sachs, in creating the 2009 financial crisis that left millions destitute.
Last April it was put to the test when EBA's board was asked to act on recommendations involving a money-laundering scandal where some €200bn of illicit Russian funds had been channeled through Danske Bank's branch in Estonia.
The board meeting, invoving Farkas, refused to act.
"He ran that meeting, he came very well prepared and seemed to have a very clear idea where this would be going," said Kenneth Haar at Corporate Europe Observatory, which was among the NGOs that filed the complaint against the EBA.
The next day he was approached by a recruitment firm on the behalf of AFME, according to the European Ombudsman. Farkas officially accepted the job in August 2019, although he only recently started this year.
The lobby group has since held at least four-high level virtual meetings with the European Commission to discuss capital requirements and the financial markets in the context of the pandemic.
For its part, the European Commission said the EBA is independently responsible when it comes to staff decisions.
Meanwhile, Farkas may be banned for two years from entering the European Parliament to lobby MEPs - if he ever requests an access badge.
Efforts are now underway to extend the same restriction to the European Commission, said Paul Tang, a Dutch socialist MEP.
"MEPs already unanimously supported my call to ban Mr Farkas from accessing the Parliament's premises and committed not to meet him in his new role. I hope other EU institutions follow suit," he said.
Site Section
Related stories
- 'Disappointing' watchdog may get new EU banking role
- Denmark's image 'damaged' by bank scandal
- Fundamental snag with new EU money-laundering rules
- Ending shell companies does not threaten privacy
- EU bank agency pledges to curb improper lobbying
- 20 years of public access to EU documents: time for makeover?