Tuesday

31st Jan 2023

EU competition authorities take on Gazprom

  • EU Competition commissioner detailed charges alledging that Russian energy giant Gazprom abused its dominant position in Europe (Photo: European commission)

The EU opened an anti-trust inquiry against Russian energy giant Gazprom on Wednesday (22 April), carefully presenting a politically sensitive issue as a simple competition case.

The European Commission sent a so-called statement of objections to Gazprom over three conducts breaking EU antitrust rules.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • Gazprom said it considers the charges as unfounded. (Photo: Mitya Aleshkovsky)

"Our preliminary view alleges that Gazprom is abusing its dominant position" in eight EU countries, said EU Competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager at a press conference in Brussels.

Vestager took care to stress that the inquiry was the result of "a case that has been going on for quite some time" and not a consequence of tensions between Russia and the EU over the war in Ukraine.

The inquiry "is based on facts, interpretation of facts and evidence we have found", she said.

The case against Gazprom was opened following a complaint filed by Lithuania in 2011 and extended to seven other countries highly dependent on Russian gas, all former Soviet bloc countries.

The first charge is that Gazprom imposes territorial restrictions on Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Slovakia.

"These restrictions include export bans and clauses requiring the purchased gas to be used in a specific territory," said the commission in a statement.

Gazprom also obliges these countries to obtain its agreement to export gas, sometime preventing them to reselling it other countries.

The second charge brought by the commission is that Gazprom imposes unfair prices on five countries - Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.

The third charge alleges that in two countries - Poland and Bulgaria - Gazprom conditioned gas delivery to commitments on gas transport infrastructure.

"Gas supplies were made dependent on investments in a pipeline project promoted by Gazprom or accepting Gazprom reinforcing its control over a pipeline," the commission noted.

Gazprom now has twelve weeks to answer these charges.

"We are in contact with Gazprom leadership, but we have not initiated negotiations," Margrethe Vestager said.

"We will listen to their arguments and be open to more roads than one. A solution can be found in a negotiated manner but others solutions are also possible," she added, while refusing to comment on eventual sanctions or fine.

According to EU competition rules, Gazprom could face a fine up to 10% of its global turnover, between 10 and 15 billion euros.

With the Russian government owning more than 50 percent of Gazprom and with the company widely considered as an instrument to spread Russian influence in Europe, the issue is highly politicised.

The Gazprom case was formally opened in 2012, and took on further political ramifications with the war in Ukraine and the resulting EU sanctions against Russia.

Last autumn, the charges were ready to be published but the competition commissioner at the time, Joaquin Almunia, did not send them to Gazprom, prompting speculation that Brussels did not want to escalate tensions with Russia.

Asked about it, Vestager answered she did "not know the reasoning behind the decisions of my predecessor".

"We do not have an issue with the company, we have an issue with a conduct which ends up with unfair prices," she said, stressing the fact that other cases were brought against other energy or state-owned companies in Europe.

She said that Gazprom is "very professional, very large, very impressive, of great importance to some EU countries".

Gazprom - 'strategic entity'

The mild tone was met however with a more political reaction from Russia.

Gazprom said in a statement it "considers the objections put forward by the European Commission to be unfounded".

The company also reminded that "it is empowered by the laws of the Russian Federation with special socially-significant functions and has the status of a strategic government-controlled business entity".

The EU move also prompted a strong reaction from Russian Foreign affairs ministers Sergei Lavrov.

"That is absolutely unacceptable," he said on Russian radio

"After the EU adopted the so-called third energy package ... there have been attempts, and they continue now, to retrospectively, retroactively apply those requirements to old contracts as well."

EU seeks oversight powers on energy security

The European Commission wants to vet all major new gas deals with non-EU suppliers under extra powers unveiled on Tuesday to prevent a major supply crisis.

Opinion

More money, more problems in EU answer to US green subsidies

Industrial energy-intense sectors, outside Germany and France, will not move to the US. They will go bust, as they cannot compete in a fragmented single market. So to save industry in two member states, we will kill the rest?

Latest News

  1. Democracy — is it in crisis or renaissance?
  2. EU lobby register still riddled with errors
  3. Polish backpedal on windfarms put EU funds at risk
  4. More money, more problems in EU answer to US green subsidies
  5. Study: EU electricity transition sped into high gear in 2022
  6. Russia and China weaponised pandemic to sow distrust, MEPs hear
  7. Frontex to spend €100m on returning migrants this year
  8. EU aims to simplify tax credits to counteract US green subsidies

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Party of the European LeftJOB ALERT - Seeking a Communications Manager (FT) for our Brussels office!
  2. European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual & Reproductive Rights (EPF)Launch of the EPF Contraception Policy Atlas Europe 2023. 8th February. Register now.
  3. Europan Patent OfficeHydrogen patents for a clean energy future: A global trend analysis of innovation along hydrogen value chains
  4. Forum EuropeConnecting the World from the Skies calls for global cooperation in NTN rollout
  5. EFBWWCouncil issues disappointing position ignoring the threats posed by asbestos
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersLarge Nordic youth delegation at COP15 biodiversity summit in Montreal

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP27: Food systems transformation for climate action
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region and the African Union urge the COP27 to talk about gender equality
  3. Friedrich Naumann Foundation European DialogueGender x Geopolitics: Shaping an Inclusive Foreign Security Policy for Europe
  4. Obama FoundationThe Obama Foundation Opens Applications for its Leaders Program in Europe
  5. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos
  6. European Committee of the RegionsRe-Watch EURegions Week 2022

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us