Saturday

4th Feb 2023

Opposition to EU soil directive 'not logical,' commission says

  • Soil protection has proved to be a tricky piece of legislation for the EU system to digest (Photo: Wikipedia)

The new European environment commissioner has called strong opposition from key member states to EU-level legislation protecting soils "not logical."

"The argument barely stands up. It seems to me not so clearly logical," commissioner Janez Potocnik told reporters following a discussion by EU environment ministers on the state of play with one of Europe's most badly delayed pieces of legislation.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

"I will try to talk to ministers from the so-called blocking minority about what are behind their real concerns. There should always be a way out."

The EU's soil directive has trodden a tortuous legislative path and remains blocked at the level of the EU Council, representing the member states.

The European Commission first submitted proposals for a soil directive as long ago as September 2006 and the bill got as far as a first reading adoption by the European Parliament the following November.

A majority of member states back the idea of soil legislation, but first five and later six member states formed a blocking minority in the council, which has in effect frozen the legislation ever since.

Discussions on the proposal took place under the Portuguese chairmanship of the EU's six month rotating presidency, then again under the French presidency in 2008 and again under the Czech presidency in the first half last year.

Frustrating the process still further, the member states in opposition, Germany, France, the UK, Austria, the Netherlands and Malta, are blocking the bill on the very principle of having a soil directive rather than on a particular line or two of the law.

Mr Potocnik gave a robust defence of the legislative proposal as it stands however:

"The blocking minority still exists, so we have to think what is best to do. Opposition is more on the principle of subsidiarity than any thing else."

"[Opponents say] soil does not move across borders. It is obvious to everybody that this is true, but soil is also very much connected with climate change or biodiversity, which are today recognised as issues dealt with at the EU level.

"It's a pretty weak argument to say that it can't be dealt with at the EU level."

The commission's proposal had been to have member states identify which sites were contaminated, maintain a public list of these sites and announce when they would clean them up.

The arguments against have focused to a considerable degree on cost. The UK argues that much has already been done at the national level and that the current proposals are too expensive.

Germany has concerns that its regions, which are largely in the hands of the centre-right and close to farming interests, would oppose the additional burden the legislation would impose. Indeed, the maintenance of German opposition to the directive forms part of the governing parties' coalition agreement.

France for its part has wanted the identification of contaminated sites to happen only when a site is sold.

France may be wavering. It is thought that with the governing UMP doing poorly in the weekend's regional elections, the party is under pressure to beef up its green profile to both squeeze the resurgent Socialist Party and to try to poach some middle class voters away from Europe Ecologie.

"Many of the problems with the directive come down to politics rather than policy," the European Environmental Bureau's Pieter de Pous, who specialises in soil issues, told EUobserver.

If Paris dropped its opposition, the rest of the states would no longer be able to form a blocking minority.

Both southern and eastern EU states strongly back the measures; the southern states due to genuine problems that they have with soil erosion and eastern countries as a result of industrial soil contamination.

Slovakia, for example, has invested substantially in decontamination projects in recent years and is keen to win recognition for its efforts.

Hawkish ECB rate-rise 'puts energy transition at risk'

The European Central Bank raised interest rates by another 0.5 percent to a 14-year high, and expects to hike rates by another half percent in March. But what does that mean for the green transition?

Polish backpedal on windfarms put EU funds at risk

Draft legislation in Poland aimed at relaxing some of Europe's strictest laws surrounding onshore wind-turbines has been derailed by a surprise last minute amendment, which could put Poland back on a collision course with the EU.

Opinion

More money, more problems in EU answer to US green subsidies

Industrial energy-intense sectors, outside Germany and France, will not move to the US. They will go bust, as they cannot compete in a fragmented single market. So to save industry in two member states, we will kill the rest?

Latest News

  1. Greece faces possible court over 'prison-like' EU-funded migration centres
  2. How the centre-right can take on hard-right and win big in 2024
  3. Top EU officials show Ukraine solidarity on risky trip
  4. MEPs launch anonymous drop-box for shady lobbying secrets
  5. Hawkish ECB rate-rise 'puts energy transition at risk'
  6. MEPs push for greater powers for workers' councils
  7. How Pavel won big as new Czech president — and why it matters
  8. French official to take on Islamophobia in EU

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Party of the European LeftJOB ALERT - Seeking a Communications Manager (FT) for our Brussels office!
  2. European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual & Reproductive Rights (EPF)Launch of the EPF Contraception Policy Atlas Europe 2023. 8th February. Register now.
  3. Europan Patent OfficeHydrogen patents for a clean energy future: A global trend analysis of innovation along hydrogen value chains
  4. Forum EuropeConnecting the World from the Skies calls for global cooperation in NTN rollout
  5. EFBWWCouncil issues disappointing position ignoring the threats posed by asbestos
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersLarge Nordic youth delegation at COP15 biodiversity summit in Montreal

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP27: Food systems transformation for climate action
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region and the African Union urge the COP27 to talk about gender equality
  3. Friedrich Naumann Foundation European DialogueGender x Geopolitics: Shaping an Inclusive Foreign Security Policy for Europe
  4. Obama FoundationThe Obama Foundation Opens Applications for its Leaders Program in Europe
  5. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos
  6. European Committee of the RegionsRe-Watch EURegions Week 2022

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us