Saturday

17th Apr 2021

Euro rules row bodes ill for Europe's future

With the dust still settling over the bad-tempered rows over the euro rules that have dominated the headlines this week, now is a good moment to consider what the economic and political consequences might be.

But first, it is important to understand why the rules were set up and to what extent they have been discarded this week.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The rules that govern the euro - known as the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) - were established in 1997 mainly at the request of Germany.

The idea was that debts would have to be controlled in a currency union. If there were no rules, then countries might feel free to run up higher debts in the knowledge that they would be bailed out by other countries in the euro zone.

The Stability Pact set out to stop this by imposing a limit on how much countries could borrow. It was decided to limit budget deficits to three percent of GDP each year and an elaborate procedure was set up to punish those countries that broke the rules.

It is this punishment procedure that was effectively shelved this week, leading many economists to suggest that budgetary discipline in the euro zone is now dead. If France and Germany don't have to play by the rules, why should other countries?

This idea - of relaxing this budgetary discipline - has far-reaching economic consequences and the idea of member states being unable to agree on such crucial economic rules has critical political significance.

Economic consequences

What does potentially greater fiscal indiscipline in the euro zone mean for the European in the street?

In the short-term, maybe higher interest rates. The European Central Bank has warned in the past that failing to respect budgetary discipline could fuel inflation, which in turn could lead to higher interest rates.

Although the row in Brussels may seem far away, it could affect your mortgage repayments - if you live in the euro zone.

But it's not necessarily all bad news, economically-speaking.

Many analysts actually think that the recent disagreements are good news for the euro zone's economy.

They argue that making Germany and France - which between them account for almost half of the euro zone's economic wealth - raise taxes or cut public spending will stifle growth in these two countries and therefore harm growth in the whole zone.

Relaxing the rules, some say, will free them to grow and provide a much-needed spurt for the whole European economy.

Political consequences

But the political significance of the feud may have a greater impact on the EU - and future EU - as a whole.

First, countries that are currently outside the euro - Denmark, the UK and Sweden - will look at the chaos surrounding the rules and the club and, in all probability, decide to stay out for the foreseeable future.

And for those - mainly smaller countries - inside the euro who tried hard to stick to the rules, sometimes with painful tax hikes, the shackles have been removed.

Countries such as the Netherlands may feel that if Germany and France break the rules, then why should they not? The row may provoke a round of tax cutting and public spending, further increasing the deficit of the zone as a whole.

Second, the accession countries will look at the euro with new eyes. All ten new EU member states are bound by the terms of their accession treaty to join the euro, but they must first adhere to strict criteria, including the criterion that their deficit must be below three percent.

It was expected that these countries would have to take painful measures to adhere to these rules, but they may now feel less bound by them. If Germany can be in the euro with a deficit of four percent of GDP, Poland may well say, why can't we?

Constitution in peril

But the main political danger must be for the Constitution and the intergovernmental conference (IGC) which is thrashing out the EU's future.

The row over the Stability Pact has been presented as a row between small countries and large countries. The Netherlands and Austria, in particular, argued that the rules should be kept as they are whereas France, Germany and the UK wanted them relaxed.

Similar fault lines exist in the negotiations over the new Constitution. On issues such as the make-up of the Commission or voting weights in the Council, it tends to be big versus small.

Having lost this battle, the smaller countries may be in less of a mood to compromise on these and other crucial issues, making agreement even harder to reach.

France and Germany to escape euro rule punishment

According to press reports, the European Commission will soon suspend disciplinary procedures against France and Germany for repeatedly breaching the rules underpinning the euro, bringing to an end a long period of uncertainty and acrimony.

Catalan MEPs lose immunity, slam 'political persecution'

Catalan separatist MEPs Carles Puigdemont, Toni Comín and Clara Ponsatí lost their parliamentary immunity - a result they have hailed as a "political victory" for bringing the conflict between Catalonia and Spain closer to the heart of Europe.

12-month Future EU Conference is 'impossible', expert warns

The debate about the much-delayed Conference on the Future of Europe so far has been locked in endless institutional infighting over who should lead the event - lowering the expectations about what can be achieved in the coming months.

Future of Europe: Nearly half of citizens want reforms

European Parliament president David Sassoli called for the Conference on the Future of Europe "to start as soon as possible". Meanwhile, nearly half of EU citizens would like to see reforms to the bloc.

EU parliament snubs anti-corruption researchers

Transparency International carried out three separate studies on integrity, of the European Parliament, the European Commission, and the Council (representing member states). The European Parliament refused to cooperate.

News in Brief

  1. EU postpones decision on labelling gas 'sustainable'
  2. MEPs call for mass surveillance ban in EU public spaces
  3. Greek and Turkish ministers trade jibes in Ankara
  4. Biden repeats opposition to Russia-Germany pipeline
  5. Navalny in danger, letter warns EU foreign ministers
  6. Lithuania keen to use Denmark's AstraZeneca vaccines
  7. Gas plants largest source of power-sector emissions
  8. Study: Higher risk of blood clots from Covid than vaccines

MEPs chide Portugal and Council in EU prosecutor dispute

The Belgian and Bulgarian prosecutors who were appointed had also not been the experts' first choice. Belgian prosecutor Jean-Michel Verelst has challenged the council's decision at the European Court of Justice.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersDigitalisation can help us pick up the green pace
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersCOVID19 is a wake-up call in the fight against antibiotic resistance
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region can and should play a leading role in Europe’s digital development
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council to host EU webinars on energy, digitalisation and antibiotic resistance
  5. UNESDAEU Code of Conduct can showcase PPPs delivering healthier more sustainable society
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersWomen benefit in the digitalised labour market

Latest News

  1. US rejects Slovenia-linked plan to break up Bosnia
  2. Ukraine urges Borrell to visit Russia front line
  3. Could US sanctions hit Russia vaccine sales to EU?
  4. Polish court pushes out critical ombudsman
  5. Political crises in Romania and Bulgaria amid third wave
  6. Von der Leyen's summer plans undisclosed, after Ukraine snub
  7. Over a million EU citizens back farm-animal cage ban
  8. Three options for West on Putin's Ukraine build-up

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us