Saturday

31st Oct 2020

Unhappy MEPs to approve passenger data deal

The freshly re-negotiated Passenger Name Record (PNR) agreement on the transfer of personal data of travellers flying from Europe to the US still raises privacy concerns, MEPs familiar with the text have said. But a veto by the parliament is unlikely, however.

"Whatever they did are just cosmetic changes, the substance of blanket data retention has remained. And even if they say personal data will be 'anonymised' after six months, the US still keeps all the records for 15 years," German Green MEP Jan Philipp Albrecht told this website on Friday (11 November).

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Albrecht said that US pressure was big both on MEPs and on member states to seal off this 'improved' text.

From his point of view, however, the agreement violates EU data privacy rules as long as the US continues to access and store all private data, such as telephone numbers, email addresses and credit card information, even if it gets blacked out and can be retrieved by US police or intelligence officers only with special permission from a superior.

A parliamentary veto is unlikely however, since it would expose European airlines to potential court cases if they continue to transfer passenger data to US authorities, which they will be obliged to if they want to fly into American airspace.

EUobserver understands that the largest group in the parliament, the European People's Party, is not willing to go down that road, even if the large German contingent within the party is still dissatisfied with some of the privacy provisions.

But with the EU being at the 'demanding' end, its negotiating position is much weaker than when the US wanted for instance an agreement on banking data transfers, which was vetoed last year by the EU legislature.

Dutch Liberal MEP Sophie in't Veld, who has also consulted the final PNR text on Thursday in a "secure room", says that her group will wait for all the legal advice it can get before deciding how to vote. In't Veld will draft the parliament's position on the PNR agreement.

"I am still very concerned. Some of the problematic issues have not really been resolved. It still allows data to be used for broader purposes than counter-terrorism and organised crime as we have demanded," she said.

Pointing out that the parliament has been fighting this data transfer agreement since 2003 and currently has the power to strike it down, she said she was disappointed to see that the final outcome turned out to be "only marginally better" than what MEPs had asked for.

"If this is what were are able to get out of our closest allies, what will come out of negotiations with other countries? South Korea and Qatar are also interested in PNR agreements, South Africa, Malaysia and Cuba are preparing demands and it will be only a matter of time until Russia and China will want this, too," in't Veld noted.

A PNR agreement with Australian was approved last month by the Parliament, but it contained much shorter retention periods - five and a half years - and it limited the scope to terrorism and organised crime, as MEPs had demanded.

Member states to clash with EU parliament on passenger data

The European Parliament is likely to clash with member states over the use of EU air travellers' personal data in the search for suspected terrorists, as the UK is pushing to change a draft bill initially designed for passengers coming from non-EU countries.

News in Brief

  1. Polish government rows back on abortion ruling
  2. EU threatens legal action against Poland on rule of law
  3. 'Several dead' after earthquake hits Greece and Turkey
  4. Hungary faces EU court over asylum restrictions
  5. Polish PM urges end to abortion protests to 'protect elderly'
  6. EU to fund cross-border hospital transfers
  7. Some 140 migrants drown on way to Spanish islands
  8. EU central bank preparing new rescue measures

Corruption failures also highlighted in rule of law report

The European Commission's first report on the rule of law has raised concerns over the lack of effective anti-corruption efforts in some members sates - while it considers Denmark, Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands have good governance measures.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking healthier diets the easy choice
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersUN Secretary General to meet with Nordic Council on COVID-19
  3. UNESDAWell-designed Deposit Return Schemes can help reach Single-Use Plastics Directive targets
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council meets Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tichanovskaja
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region to invest DKK 250 million in green digitalised business sector
  6. UNESDAReducing packaging waste – a huge opportunity for circularity

Latest News

  1. Nice attack: EU urges world leaders to stop hate speech
  2. Europe is back in (partial) lockdown
  3. Gender equality still 60 years away, warns study
  4. I'm an 'election observer' - but what do we actually do?
  5. Deal in reach on linking EU funds to rule of law
  6. EU Commission's Covid-19 expert offers bleak outlook
  7. Belgium's collaboration with Sudan's secret service: my story
  8. What do ordinary Belarusians want from the EU?

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us