Tuesday

9th Mar 2021

MEPs call for review of EU counter-terrorism policies

The European Parliament on Wednesday (14 December) called on member states to submit reports on the cost-efficiency of their counter-terrorism measures and their impact on civil liberties, with the European Commission set to produce an EU-wide evaluation.

"Remarkably little has been done to assess to what degree EU counter-terrorism policies have achieved the stated objectives," MEPs said in the non-binding text, which calls on the EU commission to make use of its powers under the Lisbon Treaty and to produce a "full and detailed" evaluation of such policies and the extent to which they are subject to democratic scrutiny.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • Member states will have to report about the effectiveness of their surveillance methods (Photo: Flickr)

The cost-efficiency report should include spending for online snooping, data protection measures, funding of counter-terrorism research and relevant EU expenditures set in place since 2001, such as the appointment of an EU anti-terrorism co-ordinator and his staff.

Private sector-related costs, for instance of telecommunication companies having to store all details of phone conversations, text messages and emails of their customers for up to two years, are to be included. The gains that businesses have made in the new market are also to be covered by the count.

The text was adopted with 307 votes in favour, 259 against and 54 abstentions.

It was a compromise version supported by a coalition of liberal, centre-left and green parties with a few centre-right MEPs also voting in favour. The original was withdrawn and re-drafted earlier in autumn when it became obvious the centre-right EPP group would vote against it.

Liberal Dutch MEP Sophie in't Veld, was responsible for drafting the text says that the core demands were kept, even if there are fewer details in the final version.

"The core message of the report is to take stock of what we have in terms of counter-terrorism policies and see what works, if we need more or less data gathering from now on," she told this website.

One such upcoming policy - a continuation of an existing 'interim' agreement with the US - is the so-called Passenger Name Record deal approved on Tuesday by interior ministers and now awaiting parliamentary approval.

Under the agreement, airlines are exempt from data protection rules in the EU when agreeing to send all personal and financial data of all air travellers flying to the US from any European destination. The declared purpose is to fight against terrorism and other serious cross-border crime punishable with more than three years of prison under US law.

The European Data protection supervisor has warned that the deal in its current form still has "excessive" retention periods - of 15 years - and said data should be deleted immediately after its analysis or after maximum 6 months.

Sensitive data such as meal preferences, indicating religion, should be excluded rather than sent and then blackened-out, and the list of potential crimes pursued with PNR-based investigations defined more specifically, the supervisor said.

MEPs could still strike down the deal, the way they did with another data transfer deal for anti-terrorism purposes early 2010 - the so-called Swift deal on banking data transfers.

But in't Veld, who is also drafting the parliament's position on passenger data, says this time around things are different because the US has the sovereign right to demand anything it wants from European airlines or to ban them from entering its airspace.

"I can't predict what the outcome of the PNR vote will be. It's still extremely problematic compared to what we had asked for," she said.

She also admitted that no agreement at all would put European airlines in a pickle, as it would open them up for potential court cases on data protection. The PNR vote is likely to take place in February.

Post-9/11 Europe: 'safer' but less free

Ten years after the fall of New York's twin towers and four months after the death of Osama Bin Laden, Europe is said to be 'safer' - but in return private data is scrutinised by a multitude of counter-terrorism programmes, few of which have been properly assessed.

US scores victory on EU air passenger screening

A permanent treaty forcing EU companies to tell US authorities what air passengers email addresses and credit card numbers are or if they ever yelled at a travel agent is one step closer to reality.

EU police warn of new-model jihad threat

The EU's joint police body, Europol has noted there were no succesful Islamist attacks in Europe last year, while warning about future Toulouse-type 'lone wolves.'

Frontex chief: 'about time' MEPs probe his agency

Some 14 MEPs have created a group to probe allegations of rights abuse by the EU's border agency Frontex. Its head, Fabrice Leggeri, welcomed its creation and said it "is about time".

Romania denies forcing migrant-boat back to Turkish waters

Romania's ministry of internal affairs wrote to Frontex claiming it did not engage in any illegal pushbacks of people on rubber boats into Turkish territorial waters. The country says it followed EU engagement rules and Greek orders.

News in Brief

  1. EU industry lobbies for 'double' CO2 perks
  2. Italy passes 100,000 corona deaths, and it's not over
  3. Mask-buying affairs embarrass Germany's top party
  4. EU talks on Kosovo and Serbia mark 10-year anniversary
  5. Ex-PM says Erdoğan pulling Turkey away from EU
  6. Report: EU to blacklist Myanmar conglomerates
  7. Suspected Chinese hackers hit EU banking regulator
  8. Belgium: Political pressure to abandon curfew

Feature

Covid-hit homeless find Xmas relief at Brussels food centre

The Kamiano food distribution centre in Brussels is expecting 20 people every half hour on Christmas Day. For many, Kamiano is also more than that - a support system for those made homeless or impoverished.

Top court finds Hungary and Poland broke EU rules

EU tribunal said Hungary's legislation made it "virtually impossible" to make an asylum application. Restricting access to international protection procedure is a violation of EU rules.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council to host EU webinars on energy, digitalisation and antibiotic resistance
  2. UNESDAEU Code of Conduct can showcase PPPs delivering healthier more sustainable society
  3. CESIKlaus Heeger and Romain Wolff re-elected Secretary General and President of independent trade unions in Europe (CESI)
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersWomen benefit in the digitalised labour market
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersReport: The prevalence of men who use internet forums characterised by misogyny
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic climate debate on 17 November!

Latest News

  1. Von der Leyen on vaccines: 'We're tired of being the scapegoat'
  2. Ethiopia: Time to tell the truth, Ambassador
  3. EU Commission 'surprised' by Belgian travel ban extension
  4. Lack of legal clarity on EU 'pushbacks' of migrants at sea
  5. Africa and Arab world still in vaccine race starting blocks
  6. Frontex's 'serious incident reports' - revealed
  7. Women hit 'disproportionately' hard by Covid-19, report finds
  8. EU 'Future' Conference plus Covid recovery talks This WEEK

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us