Tuesday

23rd Jan 2018

EU court to probe new Facebook data challenge

  • The EU's top court is set to revisit data transfers by Facebook to the United States (Photo: Eduardo Woo)

The High Court in Ireland wants the European Court of Justice to decide on a case that could have huge implications on Facebook data transfers from Europe to the United States.

On Tuesday (3 October), the court issued a 152-page judgment on Facebook's EU-US data transfers following revelations of US-led mass surveillance in 2013.

Thank you for reading EUobserver!

Subscribe now for a 30 day free trial.

  1. €150 per year
  2. or €15 per month
  3. Cancel anytime

EUobserver is an independent, not-for-profit news organization that publishes daily news reports, analysis, and investigations from Brussels and the EU member states. We are an indispensable news source for anyone who wants to know what is going on in the EU.

We are mainly funded by advertising and subscription revenues. As advertising revenues are falling fast, we depend on subscription revenues to support our journalism.

For group, corporate or student subscriptions, please contact us. See also our full Terms of Use.

If you already have an account click here to login.

Max Schrems, an Austrian privacy campaigner who had initially challenged Facebook in light of the US surveillance, said in a statement that the internet giant "seems to have lost in every argument they were making."

The five-week hearing had scoured through some 45,000 pages of documents in a move that appears to suggest that the United States may be violating the fundamental rights of Europeans.

Mass indiscriminate processing of data

The Irish court in its judgment said that "it is clear that there is mass indiscriminate processing of data by the United States government agencies, whether this is described as mass or targeted surveillance."

It noted that the "case raises issues of very major, indeed fundamental, concern to millions of people within the European Union and beyond".

EU law requires that the personal data of Europeans is "adequately protected" whenever it is transferred outside the European Union.

But the US spy hub, the National Security Agency (NSA), has been sweeping up and processing the same data regardless of EU laws, according to disclosures by US intelligence contractor Edward Snowden. The revelations sparked outrage throughout Europe.

Facebook's international seat is in Dublin. The Irish-based headquarter deals with over 85 percent of global Facebook users, which is then sent to its parent company in the United States for processing.

Facebook and similar US tech giants have been forced into a legal dilemma - to either comply with NSA demands or follow EU laws. The data transfers are worth billions to the companies.

Safe Harbour vs Privacy Shield

The European Court of Justice in 2015 had already knocked down a EU-US data sharing pact known as Safe Harbour, due in part, to mass surveillance.

The scheme has since been replaced by Privacy Shield, which itself has come under intense scrutiny given the lack of US efforts to fully implement the self-certifying agreement.

Tuesday's judgment refers to so-called standard contractual clauses that also allow the data transfers to take place.

Facebook Ireland started using the clauses with its parent US-based Facebook Inc after Safe Harbour became invalid.

The clauses have a built-in emergency feature that allows local European data protection authorities to stop the data flows, should the personal data of Europeans be violated while in the United States and elsewhere.

Schrems had argued that the Irish Data protection authority at the time was duty bound to trigger the emergency clause, given the NSA revelations.

But Tuesday's judgment now questions the validity of the standard contractual clauses in general, which had been approved by the European Commission.

Ireland's data protection commissioner, Helen Dixon, had probed Schrems complaint in 2016 and found his arguments against his data being transferred to the US compelling.

But she then questioned the validity of standard contractual clauses themselves, going beyond Schrem's initial complaint.

Schrems said such clauses are valid as they allow data protection authorities to suspend individual problematic data flows.

"It is still unclear to me why the DPC [data protection commissioner] is taking the extreme position that the SCCs [standard contractual clauses,] should be invalidated Facebook across the board, when a targeted solution is available," he said.

The Luxembourg-based court is set to receive the exact questions from the Irish High Court to be probed at a later date.

US tests EU patience over Privacy Shield

The data sharing pact with the US is yet to be fully implemented, as the Americans have failed to appoint people in key positions to ensure EU citizens' personal data is protected.

Austrian privacy case against Facebook hits legal snag

Austrian privacy campaigner Max Schrems may sue Facebook Ireland in an Austrian court but won't be able to pursue a class action suit in Austria, according to a non-binding opinion by a top EU court advisor.

Investigation

EU states copy Israel's 'predictive policing'

Israelis are using social profiling and predictive policing, also known as 'Facebook arrests', to crack down on suspects in Palestinian territories. National authorities in the EU, including the EU's police agency, Europol, are now applying the tactics closer to home.

EU Parliament 'cookie' restrictions worry online media

The European Parliament and groups representing newspapers and magazines are at odds over how new privacy rules will affect the media, especially restrictions on website cookies - but one MEP thinks it could spark new business models.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Solutions for Sustainable Cities: New Grants Awarded for Branding Projects
  2. Mission of China to the EUTrade Between China, Belt and Road Countries up 15%
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersOresund Inspires Other EU Border Regions to Work Together to Generate Growth
  4. Mission of China to the EUTrade Between China, Belt and Road Countries up 15%
  5. AJC Transatlantic InstituteAJC Calls on EU to Sanction Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, Expel Ambassadors
  6. Dialogue PlatformRoundtable on "Political Islam, Civil Islam and The West" 31 January
  7. ILGA EuropeFreedom of Movement and Same-Sex Couples in Romania – Case Update!
  8. EU2017EEEstonia Completes First EU Presidency, Introduced New Topics to the Agenda
  9. Bio-Based IndustriesLeading the Transition Towards a Post-Petroleum Society
  10. ACCAWelcomes the Start of the New Bulgarian Presidency
  11. Mission of China to the EUPremier Li and President Tusk Stress Importance of Ties at ASEM Summit
  12. EU2017EEVAT on Electronic Commerce: New Rules Adopted

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. European Jewish CongressChair of EU Parliament Working Group on Antisemitism Condemns Wave of Attacks
  2. Counter BalanceA New Study Challenges the Infrastructure Mega Corridors Agenda
  3. Dialogue PlatformThe Gülen Community: Who to Believe - Politicians or Actions?" by Thomas Michel
  4. Plastics Recyclers Europe65% Plastics Recycling Rate Attainable by 2025 New Study Shows
  5. European Heart NetworkCommissioner Andriukaitis' Address to EHN on the Occasion of Its 25th Anniversary
  6. ACCACFOs Risk Losing Relevance If They Do Not Embrace Technology
  7. UNICEFMake the Digital World Safer for Children & Increase Access for the Most Disadvantaged
  8. European Jewish CongressWelcomes Recognition of Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel and Calls on EU States to Follow Suit
  9. Mission of China to the EUChina and EU Boost Innovation Cooperation Under Horizon 2020
  10. European Gaming & Betting AssociationJuncker’s "Political" Commission Leaves Gambling Reforms to the Court
  11. AJC Transatlantic InstituteAJC Applauds U.S. Recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s Capital City
  12. EU2017EEEU Telecom Ministers Reached an Agreement on the 5G Roadmap