Friday

23rd Oct 2020

Opinion

Jailing Iran’s Internet, one user at a time

  • For the Iranian government, even text messages have become an alleged crime (Photo: kamshots)

For the Iranian government, even text messages have become an alleged crime.

This September, the Revolutionary Guards arrested 11 people in the province of Shiraz for sending joke messages through the Viber application, poking fun at the founder of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Khomeini.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Arrestees were later forced to make television confessions. Now, officials are using this recent texting fad as an excuse to call for more Internet controls.

With accusations of conspiracy and corruption, new forms of communication have been perceived as a threat to conservative Iranian hardliners who recognize tweets, posts, chats, and texts as a path to immortality and organised political dissent.

Indeed, authorities have gone to great lengths to devise legal and digital infrastructures that enable and justify its widespread censorship.

Now, as more and more of Iran’s Internet and Smartphone users face prison cells for doing little more than expressing their views digitally, the international community should take notice and speak out – particularly European States who have been major advocates for these types of freedom.

Since president Hassan Rohani’s election in July 2013, the debate over Internet restrictions has increased inside the country.

While certain public statements – including some by Rohani – offered hope of a possible thaw of online censorship, a recent spate of group arrests and harsh sentences of Internet users have proven otherwise. In June, Iran sentenced a group of technology bloggers to a combined 36 years in prison for espionage and alleged ties to foreign media.

In July, eight Facebook activists were sentenced to a total of 127 years behind bars for posting information about Iran’s political prisoners.

Extremely long prison sentences, in particular, are being used to spread fear among online activists and users, and dissuade them from take to social media playing a role in a new wave of social and political dissent.

These long sentences not only violate international law on free expression, but they fail to abide by domestic laws as well. Article 134 of Iran’s Penal Code requires that a defendant convicted of multiple overlapping charges, all based on the same single act, only serve the sentence attributed to their most serious offence.

In most of these cases, however, judges fail to limit punishment accordingly. If it was accurately enforced, for instance, activist and lawyer Abdolfattah Soltani’s 13-year prison sentence should have been significantly reduced.

Moreover, most cases dealing with online activism are prosecuted in Revolutionary Courts, whose proceedings rarely, if ever, meet international fair trial standards.

After the Khomeini jokes went viral, Iran’s Judiciary issued a one-month ultimatum to the executive branch to ban social messaging applications, such as WhatsApp, Viber, and Tango, threatening to take appropriate measures to control them if the deadline wasn’t met.

Thus far, the Ministry of Telecommunications has claimed to be working on the issue, hoping to establish a technical way in which people can use these services and filter out the “criminal content.”

As has been proven by the increase in arrests, the judiciary and other authorities have not found this answer sufficient.

As Iranian officials debate about what is the “appropriate” level of censorship and criminalization on online activity, the world must remind them that violation of international fundamental rights is not acceptable.

At the end of October, the United Nations Human Rights Council will convene to address Iran’s rights record with a Universal Periodic Review (URP). At its last URP in 2010, Iran received 23 recommendations on the right to freedom of expression and opinion, and access to the Internet – 14 of which came from European states.

Iran voluntarily accepted 12 of those recommendations. However, in the wake of its campaign to clampdown on disfavored Internet use, the Islamic Republic has clearly failed on all of its commitments.

Hopefully, at the upcoming UPR, UN member states will express their disappointment for the wave of Internet related arrests and the lack of progress seen in fulfilling their human rights obligations.

Moreover, in November an upcoming resolution on human rights in Iran at the UN General Assembly will provide governments the opportunity to send a strong unified message of concern.

Most Europeans now takes for granted the fact that we can text jokes on Viber or post our opinions on Facebook. It is therefore time we proclaim that ordinary Iranians deserve these same basic freedoms and opportunities.

It is time for European nations – who hold freedom of expression as a fundamental value – to take the lead on setting an agenda of concern that raises the bar on Iran and helps put an end to the arbitrary wave of arrests of online activists and social media users.

The writer is a former Iranian student activist who now works as program director at the human rights group United For Iran

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Ashton looks to closer EU ties on Iran visit

EU foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton has offered to work more closely with Iran on human rights and drugs trafficking on her first visit to the country.

All eyes on EU court for decision on religious slaughter

The European Court of Justice is currently facing a major question: can religious freedom coexist with animal welfare? The decision of whether religious slaughter can continue is expected in a matter of weeks.

Backroom deal will make CAP reform a catastrophic failure

MEPs will vote this week on a supposedly historical reform of the Common Agricultural Policy, which accounts for over one-third of the EU's annual budget. But as it stands, it is set to become a historical failure of catastrophic proportions.

News in Brief

  1. Commission to press Croatia on migrant 'abuse' at border
  2. Belarus opposition awarded 2020 Sakharov Prize
  3. Belgium's foreign minister in intensive care for Covid-19
  4. MEPs restrict CAP funding for bullfighting
  5. Coronavirus: Liège is 'the Lombardy of the second wave'
  6. UK to keep out EU nationals with criminal past
  7. Report: EU to restrict travel from Canada, Tunisia, Georgia
  8. Pope Francis supports same-sex civil unions

Europe has forgotten the 'farm' in 'Farm to Fork'

US secretary of agriculture Sonny Perdue argues that the EU is taking an approach "more based on 'political science' than demonstrated agricultural science" in its new Farm to Fork strategy.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking healthier diets the easy choice
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersUN Secretary General to meet with Nordic Council on COVID-19
  3. UNESDAWell-designed Deposit Return Schemes can help reach Single-Use Plastics Directive targets
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council meets Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tichanovskaja
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region to invest DKK 250 million in green digitalised business sector
  6. UNESDAReducing packaging waste – a huge opportunity for circularity

Latest News

  1. Nato and EU silent on Turkey, despite Armenia's appeal
  2. EU tells UK to decide on Brexit as deal 'within reach'
  3. EU farming deal attacked by Green groups
  4. France vows tough retaliation for teacher's murder
  5. All eyes on EU court for decision on religious slaughter
  6. 'Big majority' of citizens want EU funds linked to rule of law
  7. EU declares war on Malta and Cyprus passport sales
  8. EU Commission's Libya stance undercut by internal report

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us