3rd Jul 2022


EU and US differ on Iran sanctions

  • The critical point in the Lausanne statement negotiated by Federica Mogherini involves lifting of the sanctions imposed on Iran as soon as agreement is reached, presumably by 30 June. But will that happen? (Photo:

Peter Wittig, German ambassador to the US, recently said that alternatives to a deal to curb Iran’s nuclear programme are “not very attractive.”

He added that Germany and other nations are ready to move beyond sanctions, despite what the US Congress might do.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

It was a reference to the fact the US Senate last week passed a controversial bill that will ensure a role for Congress in any nuclear talks between president Barack Obama, Iran and half a dozen world powers.

Despite the White House’s opposition, the bill gives Congress the ability to review and to reject a final deal with Iran. In the latter case, Obama could still resort to executive action to offer sanctions relief, in co-operation with EU and UN – but it would be only a temporary measure.

Washington’s deep differences over Iran have the potential to undermine progress in the nuclear talks.

The US, according to an apocryphal story, used to wonder: “Who do I call if I want to call Europe?” Today, Iranians are asking the same question, but about America.

In Europe, the question is, will Brussels copy the US president, or US Congress, or will it act on its own?

Reforms or sanctions

While Wittig says military strikes are no alternative to a negotiated deal, military intervention has a number of supporters in Congress.

Despite the sanctions, Iran recently exported a record 7 million barrels of oil per day. And despite decades of international isolation, it is the second largest economy in the Middle East and north Africa, after Saudi Arabia.

In 2014, its GDP amounted to an estimated US$ 406 billion. Like Egypt, the region’s most populous nation, it has almost 81 million inhabitants.

Nevertheless, sanctions have led to severe stagnation. Inflationary pressures peaked on a year-to-year basis at 35 percent in 2013, while the unemployment rate climbed to 12-13 percent and every fifth Iranian fell below the poverty line.

Last year, Iran’s economy bounded out of recession with growth estimated at 3.0 percent. The turnaround came on the back of a temporary and partial easing of sanctions imposed on Iran’s oil exports.

Petrochemical products account for more than an estimated 80 percent of Iran’s exports. Iran has the world's fourth-largest proved crude oil reserves and the world's largest natural gas reserves.

Its economic potential is fuelled by large buyers of its crude and condensate in China, India, Japan, South Korea, and Turkey. As Europe remains highly reliant on Russian energy supplies, Iran holds potential as a potential alternative supplier.

What makes Tehran’s role even more attractive is the fact that Iran has pressed ahead with economic reforms – as even the International Monetary Fund (IMF) acknowledged already a year ago.

In late 2013, former EU foreign relations chief Catherine Ashton brokered a vital deal with Iran. On 2 April, 2015, Iran and the so-called 5+1 parties – the US, the UK, France, Germany, Russia and China – reached a mutual understanding.

In Lausanne, Federica Mogherini, Ashton’s successor, chaired the final-stage talks, which were hailed by EU leaders, including German chancellor Angela Merkel and French president Francois Hollande, and greeted by street parties in Tehran.

The critical point in the Lausanne statement involves the lifting of the sanctions imposed on Iran as soon as final agreement is reached, presumably by 30 June. But will that happen?


In a slow progress scenario, the talks would result in a final deal, a gradual phase-out of sanctions, but heavy compliance requirements, which would mean incremental economic improvement in 2015-16.

If there is no deal, Iran’s oil production would remain weak, which would work against Iran’s energy clients in the emerging world, particularly in Asia.

While a no-deal scenario would cast a dark shadow over global growth prospects, it would benefit those that stand to gain from Brent oil’s rebound to $65 by the end of 2015 and significantly higher a year later.

There is a third scenario, but it is currently the least likely to materialise.

In a rapid-progress scenario, sanctions would be phased out swiftly, which would push investment in the oil sector.

It would benefit consumer welfare worldwide (Brent oil prices could fall below $50 per barrel), particularly in emerging Asia (which unlike advanced economies is amid an energy-intensive development phase). But this scenario would force new adjustments in non-OPEC producers (particularly the US), which many of them oppose.

Yet, the simple fact remains that both advanced Europe and emerging Asia would benefit from a rapid progress scenario.

What’s needed in Lausanne is great restraint to reach the right outcome and to ensure it prevails – even after the next US elections.

Dan Steinbock is the research director at the India, China and America Institute (USA) and a visiting fellow at the Shanghai Institute for International Studies (China)


The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

US and EU bring Iran in from the cold

The US and EU have agreed to lift most sanctions on Iran in return for a 15-year freeze on uranium enrichment and full access for UN inspectors

Time for EU to hand Iran dossier to Mogherini

Institutions matter more than personalities in the Iran talks. Ashton did a good job, but it's time for the EU to show it has faith in its new foreign policy chief by giving the Iran job to Mogherini.


Iran keen to sell gas to EU

Iran is voicing fresh interest in selling gas to Europe. But the idea, which would reduce dependence on Russia, is conditional on the outcome of nuclear talks.

Nato's Madrid summit — key takeaways

For the most part Nato and its 30 leaders rose to the occasion — but it wasn't without room for improvement. The lesson remains that Nato still doesn't know how or want to hold allies accountable for disruptive behaviour.


One rubicon after another

We realise that we are living in one of those key moments in history, with events unfolding exactly the way Swiss art historian Jacob Burckhardt describes them: a sudden crisis, rushing everything into overdrive.

Expect Czech EU presidency to downgrade V4 priorities

The Czech Republic is already in the throes of an extremely difficult period — several waves of Covid, high inflation, energy fears, an influx of Ukrainian refugees and a Prague corruption scandal. Now it has the EU presidency.

News in Brief

  1. EU Parliament 'photographs protesting interpreters'
  2. Poland still failing to meet EU judicial criteria
  3. Report: Polish president fishing for UN job
  4. Auditors raise alarm on EU Commission use of consultants
  5. Kaliningrad talks needed with Russia, says Polish PM
  6. Report: EU to curb state-backed foreign takeovers
  7. EU announces trade deal with New Zealand
  8. Russia threatens Norway over goods transit

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers write to EU about new food labelling
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersEmerging journalists from the Nordics and Canada report the facts of the climate crisis
  4. Council of the EUEU: new rules on corporate sustainability reporting
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers for culture: Protect Ukraine’s cultural heritage!
  6. Reuters InstituteDigital News Report 2022

Latest News

  1. Nato's Madrid summit — key takeaways
  2. Czech presidency to fortify EU embrace of Ukraine
  3. Covid-profiting super rich should fight hunger, says UN food chief
  4. EU pollution and cancer — it doesn't have to be this way
  5. Israel smeared Palestinian activists, EU admits
  6. MEPs boycott awards over controversial sponsorship
  7. If Russia collapses — which states will break away?
  8. EU Parliament interpreters stage strike

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us