Thursday

7th Jul 2022

Opinion

Republika Srpska referendum will spur reforms

  • The Republika Srpska parliament on 15 July decided to hold a referendum on the state judiciary but has not yet set a date for the vote. (Photo: Jennifer Boyer)

Republika Srpska’s (RS) planned referendum on the Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) Court and Prosecutor’s Office is an opportunity for RS citizens to help spur reforms to institutions that were illegally forced on BiH by the Office of the High Representative, the international bureau which oversees implementation of post-war accords.

RS president Milorad Dodik has issued a detailed report and legal analysis explaining why the referendum is legal and necessary.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The referendum is part of the RS’s longstanding efforts to bring about essential reforms to the BiH Court and Prosecutor’s Office - reforms that many European observers agree are necessary.

For example, the BiH Court and Prosecutor’s Office must end its pattern of discrimination against Serb victims of war crimes and its deference to the wishes of the Bosniak SDA party.

The International Crisis Group has criticised the Prosecutor’s Office for its failure to prosecute some of the war’s worst war crimes against Serbs.

Even US deputy chief of mission Nicholas M. Hill recently observed that the chief prosecutor is “largely believed to be heavily influenced by Bosniak political forces” and that there are “complaints that the prosecutor’s office has too many strong-willed SDA acolytes on its staff”.

Out of 7,480 Serb civilian war deaths, just 10 have led to a final conviction in the BiH court.

The BiH Court and Prosecutor’s Office have also expanded their jurisdiction through unlawful means, taking jurisdiction over cases under entity law charges essentially whenever they see fit. EU officials and experts have agreed with the RS government that the Court’s jurisdictional practices violate European standards on legal certainty and the principle of the natural judge.

The RS government has long sought reforms to address these and other problems, including through the EU’s structured dialogue on justice. Unfortunately, the BiH Court and Prosecutor’s Office, backed by Bosniak politicians, the EU’s high representative, and some officials of foreign governments in Sarajevo, have fiercely resisted any reforms.

The RS hopes the referendum, by registering its citizens’ lack of confidence on the Court and Prosecutor’s Office, will help bring about reform.

Referendum

Referendums are fully consistent with the BiH constitution and the practice of democratic states throughout Europe and around the world.

As the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly said in a 2007 resolution, “Referendums are an instrument of direct democracy which belong to the European electoral heritage.”

The proposed referendum is protected by the BiH constitution, the European Convention on Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) as a peaceful and legally structured mechanism for freedom of expression by RS citizens of their views and opinions dealing with public institutions and the high representative.

The high representative has foreclosed all constitutional challenges to his orders and has punished BiH citizens for their individual expression.

The BiH Court and Prosecutor’s Office were created in 2000 and 2002, respectively, by decrees of the high representative after the BiH Parliamentary Assembly declined to create them.

The high representative, a position created under Annex 10 of the post-war Dayton Accords, has never had any authority to decree laws, as the text of Annex 10 makes clear.

Former UK ambassador to BiH Charles Crawford, who helped invent the “Bonn Powers,” the high representative’s mandate, has written: “As far as I could see the Bonn Powers had no real legal basis at all.”

The RS is hopeful that the upcoming referendum, in addition to giving RS citizens a voice about institutions that wield power over them, will promote long-overdue reforms of the BiH Court and Prosecutor’s Office.

Mario Djuragic is head of Republika Srepska's representation in Brussels

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

EU needs to confront Dodik

Past concessions have merely delayed the day of reckoning with Bosnian Serb separatists.

Keeping gas as 'green' in taxonomy vote only helps Russia

Two days before Vladimir Putin launched his illegal war on my home country Ukraine, Russian energy minister Nikolai Shulginov gave an interview addressing the European Commission's taxonomy on sustainable activities — saying he was pleased it kept gas as 'green'.

Column

'War on Women' needs forceful response, not glib statements

Some modest headway in recognising the unrelenting tide of discrimination and violence facing women worldwide was made at last week's largely self-congratulatory and mostly irrelevant G7 talk-fest. But no one mentioned abortion, just days after the Roe vs Wade decision.

The Digital Services Act — a case-study in keeping public in dark

Companies and lobby groups like Spotify, Google and International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) were able to lobby member states using live knowledge of the trilogue discussions on content-ranking systems, advertising and liability for search engines.

Is China a challenge to Nato? Beijing responds

The Chinese mission to the EU responds to last week's Madrid Nato summit, which stated China posed "systemic challenges" and warned against the "deepening strategic partnership between Russia and China".

The human rights aspects of Grenoble's 'burkini' controversy

Sooner or later, the European Court of Human Rights will have a final say on whether Grenoble is allowed to permit the 'burkini'. Its judgment, like the one permitting the outlawing of full-face veils, risks influencing policymaking across the continent.

The Digital Services Act — a case-study in keeping public in dark

Companies and lobby groups like Spotify, Google and International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) were able to lobby member states using live knowledge of the trilogue discussions on content-ranking systems, advertising and liability for search engines.

Council must act on core of EU migration package

By only screening, fingerprinting or relocating (some) refugees, or by outsourcing our border control to Turkey and giving Erdogan our keys, we will not solve the current problems.

News in Brief

  1. France says EU fiscal discipline rules 'obsolete'
  2. Russia claims untouchable status due to nuclear arsenal
  3. Catalan MEPs lose EU court case over recognition
  4. 39 arrested in migrant-smuggling dragnet
  5. France to nationalise nuclear operator amid energy crisis
  6. Instant legal challenge after ok for 'green' gas and nuclear
  7. Alleged Copenhagen shooter tried calling helpline
  8. Socialist leader urges Czech PM to ratify Istanbul convention

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers write to EU about new food labelling
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersEmerging journalists from the Nordics and Canada report the facts of the climate crisis
  4. Council of the EUEU: new rules on corporate sustainability reporting
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers for culture: Protect Ukraine’s cultural heritage!
  6. Reuters InstituteDigital News Report 2022

Latest News

  1. Is Orban holding out an olive branch to EPP?
  2. EU should freeze all EU funds to Hungary, says study
  3. Legal action looms after MEPs back 'green' nuclear and gas
  4. EU readies for 'complete Russian gas cut-off', von der Leyen says
  5. Rising prices expose lack of coherent EU response
  6. Keeping gas as 'green' in taxonomy vote only helps Russia
  7. 'War on Women' needs forceful response, not glib statements
  8. Greece defends disputed media and migration track record

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us