Sunday

28th May 2023

Opinion

Republika Srpska referendum will spur reforms

  • The Republika Srpska parliament on 15 July decided to hold a referendum on the state judiciary but has not yet set a date for the vote. (Photo: Jennifer Boyer)

Republika Srpska’s (RS) planned referendum on the Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) Court and Prosecutor’s Office is an opportunity for RS citizens to help spur reforms to institutions that were illegally forced on BiH by the Office of the High Representative, the international bureau which oversees implementation of post-war accords.

RS president Milorad Dodik has issued a detailed report and legal analysis explaining why the referendum is legal and necessary.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The referendum is part of the RS’s longstanding efforts to bring about essential reforms to the BiH Court and Prosecutor’s Office - reforms that many European observers agree are necessary.

For example, the BiH Court and Prosecutor’s Office must end its pattern of discrimination against Serb victims of war crimes and its deference to the wishes of the Bosniak SDA party.

The International Crisis Group has criticised the Prosecutor’s Office for its failure to prosecute some of the war’s worst war crimes against Serbs.

Even US deputy chief of mission Nicholas M. Hill recently observed that the chief prosecutor is “largely believed to be heavily influenced by Bosniak political forces” and that there are “complaints that the prosecutor’s office has too many strong-willed SDA acolytes on its staff”.

Out of 7,480 Serb civilian war deaths, just 10 have led to a final conviction in the BiH court.

The BiH Court and Prosecutor’s Office have also expanded their jurisdiction through unlawful means, taking jurisdiction over cases under entity law charges essentially whenever they see fit. EU officials and experts have agreed with the RS government that the Court’s jurisdictional practices violate European standards on legal certainty and the principle of the natural judge.

The RS government has long sought reforms to address these and other problems, including through the EU’s structured dialogue on justice. Unfortunately, the BiH Court and Prosecutor’s Office, backed by Bosniak politicians, the EU’s high representative, and some officials of foreign governments in Sarajevo, have fiercely resisted any reforms.

The RS hopes the referendum, by registering its citizens’ lack of confidence on the Court and Prosecutor’s Office, will help bring about reform.

Referendum

Referendums are fully consistent with the BiH constitution and the practice of democratic states throughout Europe and around the world.

As the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly said in a 2007 resolution, “Referendums are an instrument of direct democracy which belong to the European electoral heritage.”

The proposed referendum is protected by the BiH constitution, the European Convention on Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) as a peaceful and legally structured mechanism for freedom of expression by RS citizens of their views and opinions dealing with public institutions and the high representative.

The high representative has foreclosed all constitutional challenges to his orders and has punished BiH citizens for their individual expression.

The BiH Court and Prosecutor’s Office were created in 2000 and 2002, respectively, by decrees of the high representative after the BiH Parliamentary Assembly declined to create them.

The high representative, a position created under Annex 10 of the post-war Dayton Accords, has never had any authority to decree laws, as the text of Annex 10 makes clear.

Former UK ambassador to BiH Charles Crawford, who helped invent the “Bonn Powers,” the high representative’s mandate, has written: “As far as I could see the Bonn Powers had no real legal basis at all.”

The RS is hopeful that the upcoming referendum, in addition to giving RS citizens a voice about institutions that wield power over them, will promote long-overdue reforms of the BiH Court and Prosecutor’s Office.

Mario Djuragic is head of Republika Srepska's representation in Brussels

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

EU needs to confront Dodik

Past concessions have merely delayed the day of reckoning with Bosnian Serb separatists.

How the EU's money for waste went to waste in Lebanon

The EU led support for the waste management crisis in Lebanon, spending around €89m between 2004-2017, with at least €30m spent on 16 solid-waste management facilities. However, it failed to deliver.

The EU needs to foster tech — not just regulate it

The EU's ambition to be a digital superpower stands in stark contrast to the US — but the bigger problem is that it remains far better at regulation than innovation, despite decades of hand-wringing over Europe's technology gap.

EU export credits insure decades of fossil-fuel in Mozambique

European governments are phasing out fossil fuels at home, but continuing their financial support for fossil mega-projects abroad. This is despite the EU agreeing last year to decarbonise export credits — insurance on risky non-EU projects provided with public money.

Column

What a Spanish novelist can teach us about communality

In a world where cultural clashes and sectarianism seems to be on the increase, Spanish novelist Javier Cercas (b.1962) takes the opposite approach. He cherishes both life in the big city and in the countryside.

The EU needs to foster tech — not just regulate it

The EU's ambition to be a digital superpower stands in stark contrast to the US — but the bigger problem is that it remains far better at regulation than innovation, despite decades of hand-wringing over Europe's technology gap.

EU export credits insure decades of fossil-fuel in Mozambique

European governments are phasing out fossil fuels at home, but continuing their financial support for fossil mega-projects abroad. This is despite the EU agreeing last year to decarbonise export credits — insurance on risky non-EU projects provided with public money.

Latest News

  1. How the EU's money for waste went to waste in Lebanon
  2. EU criminal complicity in Libya needs recognition, says expert
  3. Europe's missing mails
  4. MEPs to urge block on Hungary taking EU presidency in 2024
  5. PFAS 'forever chemicals' cost society €16 trillion a year
  6. EU will 'react as appropriate' to Russian nukes in Belarus
  7. The EU needs to foster tech — not just regulate it
  8. EU: national energy price-spike measures should end this year

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. International Sustainable Finance CentreJoin CEE Sustainable Finance Summit, 15 – 19 May 2023, high-level event for finance & business
  2. ICLEISeven actionable measures to make food procurement in Europe more sustainable
  3. World BankWorld Bank Report Highlights Role of Human Development for a Successful Green Transition in Europe
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic summit to step up the fight against food loss and waste
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersThink-tank: Strengthen co-operation around tech giants’ influence in the Nordics
  6. EFBWWEFBWW calls for the EC to stop exploitation in subcontracting chains

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. InformaConnecting Expert Industry-Leaders, Top Suppliers, and Inquiring Buyers all in one space - visit Battery Show Europe.
  2. EFBWWEFBWW and FIEC do not agree to any exemptions to mandatory prior notifications in construction
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ways to prevent gender-based violence
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Economic gender equality now! Nordic ways to close the pension gap
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Pushing back the push-back - Nordic solutions to online gender-based violence
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: The Nordics are ready to push for gender equality

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us