Monday

11th Dec 2017

Letter

Nord Stream 2 sets record straight

  • There are five major energy companies from four EU countries who have publicly committed to supporting the project, says Sebastian Sass, EU Advisor to Nord Stream 2 . (Photo: nord-stream.com)

On Tuesday, Sijbren de Jong published a commentary about the pipeline project Nord Stream 2, but regrettably, his conclusions were blurred by flawed assumptions and baseless speculations.

Firstly, it is important to note that any pipeline has two ends.

Thank you for reading EUobserver!

Subscribe now for a 30 day free trial.

  1. €150 per year
  2. or €15 per month
  3. Cancel anytime

EUobserver is an independent, not-for-profit news organization that publishes daily news reports, analysis, and investigations from Brussels and the EU member states. We are an indispensable news source for anyone who wants to know what is going on in the EU.

We are mainly funded by advertising and subscription revenues. As advertising revenues are falling fast, we depend on subscription revenues to support our journalism.

For group, corporate or student subscriptions, please contact us. See also our full Terms of Use.

If you already have an account click here to login.

It is not just the Russian counterpart who is interested in our project, but there are five major energy companies from four EU countries who have publicly committed to supporting the project because of a need for additional import capacity: BASF/Wintershall, Engie, OMV, Shell, Uniper.

It is a multinational undertaking, bringing jobs and investments to more than a dozen countries.

Western European gas production is in rapid decline while gas will remain an important source of low-carbon energy.

Once the gas has arrived on the internal market via Nord Stream 2, it can be freely shipped across the EU, including Central, Eastern and South Eastern Europe.

The high utilisation rate of the existing Nord Stream pipeline confirms our business case. In 2016, on average 80 percent of the capacity was in use; in 2017 the average utilisation so far has been 97 percent.

Secondly, it is beyond question that Nord Stream 2 will comply with all applicable EU laws.

There is a comprehensive regulatory framework consisting of international conventions, EU laws and national legislation of the countries along the route of the pipeline: Denmark, Finland, Germany, and Sweden are known for exceptionally high standards of governance, transparency, and environmental responsibility.

We have full confidence that the authorities of these countries will apply all relevant laws objectively and with the highest degree of diligence.

Green logistics concept

Nord Stream 2 is asking for no preferential treatment; we rely on the ordinary approvals procedures under the rule of law – but we reject any calls for discriminatory treatment of Nord Stream 2 for purely political motivations.

Lastly, it is regrettable that I need to respond to the absurd proposition of Mr de Jong who claims that our preference for a Swedish port as a logistics hub for the construction of Nord Stream 2 would somehow indicate that our project pursues political rather than commercial objectives.

Without any apparent understanding of the realities of pipeline construction, Mr de Jong goes on to conclude that a purely commercial company would have chosen the port of Kaliningrad instead; he claims to know that labour and storage costs there would be “much lower”.

The choice of the logistics hubs for Nord Stream 2 follows the award-winning green logistics concept of the first Nord Stream project.

The larger share of steel pipes is supplied from Western Europe.

Of course, it is both more competitive and sustainable to use onshore facilities that are as close to the pipeline route as possible.

The locations have been chosen with the aim of reducing transport distances between the ports and the offshore construction sites. Kaliningrad port was not chosen due to longer transport distances and other specific logistical criteria.

Our approach eliminates any unnecessary environmental impacts, risks, and emissions from maritime transport.

This goes to show that our highest priorities are safety, compliance and sustainability.

Instead, Mr de Jong’s commentary gives priority to unsubstantiated allegations and political motivations.

We will continue our transparent dialogue with all stakeholders and interest groups to ensure the availability of solid facts for the evaluation of Nord Stream 2 – based on its own merits rather than rumour-mongering.

Sebastian Sass is EU Advisor to Nord Stream 2

Column / Crude World

Nord Stream 2: The elephant in the room

The European Commission should provide a thorough impact assessment of Nord Stream 2, a project that appears to go against all of its Energy Union objectives.

Column / Crude World

Nordstream 2: Alternative pipeline facts

Arguments put forward by Nord Stream 2's Brussels lobbyist in defence of the Russian-led project are not consistent and ignore some basic facts.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNICEFMake the Digital World Safer for Children & Increase Access for the Most Disadvantaged
  2. European Jewish CongressWelcomes Recognition of Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel and Calls on EU States to Follow Suit
  3. Mission of China to the EUChina and EU Boost Innovation Cooperation Under Horizon 2020
  4. European Gaming & Betting AssociationJuncker’s "Political" Commission Leaves Gambling Reforms to the Court
  5. AJC Transatlantic InstituteAJC Applauds U.S. Recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s Capital City
  6. EU2017EEEU Telecom Ministers Reached an Agreement on the 5G Roadmap
  7. European Friends of ArmeniaEU-Armenia Relations in the CEPA Era: What's Next?
  8. Mission of China to the EU16+1 Cooperation Injects New Vigour Into China-EU Ties
  9. EPSUEU Blacklist of Tax Havens Is a Sham
  10. EU2017EERole of Culture in Building Cohesive Societies in Europe
  11. ILGA EuropeCongratulations to Austria - Court Overturns Barriers to Equal Marriage
  12. Centre Maurits CoppietersCelebrating Diversity, Citizenship and the European Project With Fundació Josep Irla

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. European Healthy Lifestyle AllianceUnderstanding the Social Consequences of Obesity
  2. Union for the MediterraneanMediterranean Countries Commit to Strengthening Women's Role in Region
  3. Bio-Based IndustriesRegistration for BBI JU Stakeholder Forum about to close. Last chance to register!
  4. European Heart NetworkThe Time Is Ripe for Simplified Front-Of-Pack Nutrition Labelling
  5. Counter BalanceNew EU External Investment Plan Risks Sidelining Development Objectives
  6. EU2017EEEAS Calls for Eastern Partnership Countries to Enter EU Market Through Estonia
  7. Dialogue PlatformThe Turkey I No Longer Know
  8. World Vision7 Million Children at Risk in the DRC: Donor Meeting to Focus on Saving More Lives
  9. EPSU-Eurelectric-IndustriAllElectricity European Social Partners Stand up for Just Energy Transition
  10. European Friends of ArmeniaSignature of CEPA Marks a Fresh Start for EU-Armenia Relations
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Energy Ministers Pledge to Work More Closely at Nordic and EU Level
  12. European Friends of ArmeniaPresident Sargsyan Joined EuFoA Honorary Council Inaugural Meeting