Monday

27th Jun 2022

Opinion

The sick man of the world’s democracies

Looking at the huge queues outside polling stations on 2 November, I had to ask myself some simple questions.

How many Europeans would have left such queues, refusing to wait for up to seven hours (as happened in some places in Ohio) to cast their votes?

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

And, how many Europeans would then, the next day, have taken to the street to denounce this flaw in the electoral process?

I came to the conclusion that, in both cases, the answer would be the same: a lot.

We still do not know how many Americans decided that they did not want to or could not afford to wait for many hours in order to be able to exercise their voting right.

And we can see that nobody demonstrated against the extraordinary situation after polling day.

Growing transatlantic rift

I believe that this example says a lot about the growing rift between Americans and Europeans. It also says a lot about the current status of US democracy, which has become the ‘sick man of the world's democracies’.

As was stated by the OSCE election observers, the US election system is worse than many in Third World countries and is totally unable to match the basic criteria for a 21st century democracy.

First, it is not a national election, nor an election in 50 states - it is an election organized in 13000 different ways, one for each district. Without one or just a few election laws, there is no way to ensure its fairness.

Fraud is already part of the game because of the obsolescence of a system dating from the early 19th century. For instance, due to local regulations, OSCE observers could not enter polling stations in one state … guess which one … Ohio!

Identifying voters

Second, without a proper ID card system, securing the identification of voters is almost impossible. As one OSCE observer pointed out, the US should be using the ‘ink on the thumb’ system to prevent people voting twice.

Meanwhile, the lack of a credible identification system (people use drivers licenses or social security numbers - both of which are easily forged) generates a messy attempt of control through voters lists.

This paves the way for all sorts of litigation while not preventing multiple votes.

Third, the US voting system is unable to deliver anything but machines which cannot give any warranty on their reliability (electronic voting with no paper printing control system), nor on their accuracy.

Privatisation of polling stations

Meanwhile, the belief that private companies can do a better job than a publicly-owned voting system casts a big shadow over the whole process - particularly when those companies have direct political connections with one candidate.

And fourth, the insufficient number of polling stations leading to a large number of US citizens who could not wait or would not wait for such a long time to be able to cast their vote.

The fact that there are huge queues obliging people to wait for hours before casting their vote is not a sign of a healthy democracy, but rather a sign that the democratic system is unable to match the demand of its citizens.

Waiting to vote for hours

This puts this US election closer to the recent election in Afghanistan than to one in any developed world democracy.

A question then immediately comes to mind: who decided and how about the number of polling stations?

It is a way of denying access to the vote to several sections of the population.

Workers with low income, who cannot afford to miss a days work, are for instance part of such a group. Young voters are another one, who, unless they are highly politically motivated, are most likely going to turn away from a 3 hour waiting election line.

No questions

But still nobody is reacting in the US. Journalists, politicians, experts, citizens … stay mute.

In today's US, people grumble on their own, or cheer the success of their own candidate, as if democracy was not, first of all, depending on the quality of the electoral process, rather than who is the winner.

This is what is being heavily discussed in Europe. This is what I have been debating with my US friends. This is what I want to share with you today even if it brings very transatlantically incorrect topics on the agenda, because this is part of the new image of the US in the world.

Franck Biancheri - is director of Studies and Strategy at the foundation Europe 2020 and President of the transatlantic organisation TIESweb

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Expect Czech EU presidency to downgrade V4 priorities

The Czech Republic is already in the throes of an extremely difficult period — several waves of Covid, high inflation, energy fears, an influx of Ukrainian refugees and a Prague corruption scandal. Now it has the EU presidency.

How to enhance EU cybersecurity

The Hungarian hacking allowed Russian intelligence to read 'over the shoulder' of an EU member state for an extended period of time. The difficulty for the EU is that it's not one nation, but a combination of 27 cybersecurity policies.

Competing options for EU enlargement

We now have French president Emmanuel Macron's "European Political Community", European Council president Charles Michel's "European Geopolitical Community", and former Italian PM Enrico Letta's "European Confederation" — among others.

Sturgeon's 2023 'referendum' gamble for Scotland

The independence campaign launch featured a new Scottish government report, comparing the UK's economic and social record with those of other European states — and arguing, unsurprisingly, that Scotland should be independent as a result.

Column

China's support for Russia challenges Europe's Peace Order

China's soft support to Russia is deeply troubling for Europe. Here is the EU's biggest trading partner signalling that it is on the side of Russia, its aggression, and its challenge to the post-war international order.

Sturgeon's 2023 'referendum' gamble for Scotland

The independence campaign launch featured a new Scottish government report, comparing the UK's economic and social record with those of other European states — and arguing, unsurprisingly, that Scotland should be independent as a result.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersEmerging journalists from the Nordics and Canada report the facts of the climate crisis
  2. Council of the EUEU: new rules on corporate sustainability reporting
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers for culture: Protect Ukraine’s cultural heritage!
  4. Reuters InstituteDigital News Report 2022
  5. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBHow price increases affect construction workers
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Nordic think tank examines influence of tech giants

Latest News

  1. Expect Czech EU presidency to downgrade V4 priorities
  2. Big polluters should have no role in planning EU energy policy
  3. G7, Nato, gas anxiety and Ukraine top This WEEK
  4. Death toll rising after thousands storm Spain's wall in Africa
  5. EU summit's uncertainty in the face of economic war
  6. Next winter's gas looms large at EU summer summit
  7. Ukraine becomes EU candidate after 120 days of war
  8. How to enhance EU cybersecurity

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us