Thursday

18th Oct 2018

Opinion

New composition of the European Parliament should be a wake-up call

The European Parliament's constitutional committee has begun negotiations on a new composition of its seats.

The rejected constitution – now being re-pasted into the Reform Treaty - includes radical change in the distribution of votes in the Council but only small adjustments of the composition of seats in the Parliament. Under its terms no country will have less than 6 seats. No country will have more than 96.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

In the first discussion in the constitutional committee on Monday (3 September) there was a consensus on establishing clear mathematical rules for the distribution of seats to avoid trading and injustices. We have a lot of them today.

The Netherlands with 16 million citizens has 27 seats. Belgium 24 for 10 million citizens and Sweden only 19 with 9 million citizens.

The distribution must be adjusted according to simple methods of calculation so that no country can have more or less than they are entitled to from the size of their population.

The existing concept for distribution is called "digressive proportionality".

But just how digressive is the essence of the battle.

The European Parliament has appointed two representatives from big countries to be in charge of the report.

One is the former minister of Europe for France, Alain Lamassoure, representing the biggest group in the European Parliament, the Christian-Democrats. The socialist group has appointed Adrian Severin from Romania.

The final result will be adopted by vote in Brussels on 11 October and be inserted into the Reform Treaty to be adopted in Lisbon in October.

Small countries have to wake up

Small- and medium-sized countries have to wake up now, otherwise they risk less representation in both the Council and the Parliament in the future.

With the next treaty small member states will lose heavily in the Council. From 2014 they may also lose in the parliament if the new ways of distribution are carried through.

Mr Lamassoure and Mr Severin have circulated a draft table with only small and justified amendments for the coming treaty change. They know a radical shake up now will hinder ratification.

But the European Parliament has previously worked with a proposal which would only give my country (Denmark) 10 instead of the 16 representatives we had before the enlargement with the former communist countries and the 14 seats today.

In the debate there was a proposal to give all member states 6 seats and then distribute the rest proportionally. This would be a good approach if the EU were a federal state and all states were equal in the Council. But they are not.

Under the new treaty, my country will have halve its influence in the Council. Germany will double its voting strength.

The EU is not a state where all citizens have the same say. The EU ought to be an international cooperation between sovereign states sharing competencies only where they cannot decide efficiently on their own.

In the Council member states also vote according to size. Therefore it simply does not make sense to have a second chamber where voting is also according to size.

It should be chosen which chamber votes according to member states size and which has equal representation of the participating states.

Germany dominating

In the US, all states are equal in the senate with two seats each and every citizen has the same influence in the House of Representatives. In the German Bundesrat, the small states have three votes and the biggest states six. Why should we accept a system that would never be allowed in Germany?

It is Germany who forced the "double majority" vote into the constitution and again Germany insisting it remained.

Germany should have rethink and propose a distribution with fewer seats for Germany and the other big member states - or change the voting system in the Council.

Today Germany has the dominating position in the major groups in the European Parliament. They have controlled the EPP group for many years and the President for the European Parliament, Hans-Gert Poettering, is German.

The German national party the SPD is leading the socialist group in the European Parliament. The German liberals have the vice-chair in the liberal group and Germans even have dominating positions in the Green group with a German-French President and in the GUE group with a vice-chair of the group.

Such dominating roles are not necessary. It destroys the possibility for real pluralism in the representation of small countries. A lot of political parties from the smaller member states may soon lose their representation in the European Parliament.

Much less representative European Parliament

This would be a much less representative European Parliament and decisions made that affect those citizens not represented would not feel legitimate. This is both the core problem and core task.

We do not have one single European party where citizens feel well represented. The European parties are artificial with no membership and participation of individual members.

In fact, is only the eurosceptic EUDemocrats that allow direct membership!

I urge my good colleagues to look primarily at establishing a key for distribution which allows pluralist representation from all member states. Start with the minimum at a higher figure than 6 seats and make the system very digressive.

To obtain that, Germany should be urged to give up some representation. It can afford it. And it would force others to follow.

A decision on the borders of Europe

This is also a question of future enlargements. We have a maximum of 750 seats to distribute. Who can imagine that there will be further enlargements if member states have to heavily reduce their own role in the European Parliament and the Council by accepting new countries into the EU?

Turkey, Belarus or Ukraine are unlikely to ever get in under this scenario.

We need a better balance in the European Parliament between small and big countries and a clear rule for automatic redistribution after each further enlargement.

In the original assembly, small states like Denmark had 10 votes and the biggest countries 36. Big states had 10 votes in the Council against 3 for smaller states like Denmark. Before, Germany had 3 times the Danish voting strength in the Council. Now they will have 15 times more voting power.

Before, Germany had 3.5 times the Danish representation in the Parliament. Now it may be 7 times. It is too much.

I am a good friend of neighbouring Germany and I have no problem with the many German leaders in the European Parliament. But I would prefer to vote for them because of their qualifications and not because of their excessive voting power and representation.

The author is a member of the European Parliament for the Independence/Democracy group

MEPs demand more from EU on human rights in Asia

On Thursday and Friday, heads of state of 51 Asian and European countries will be in Brussels for a summit with the EU. As MEPs, we denounce the fact that many countries around the table are major human rights violators.

Daily reality in Western Sahara - and how EU can protect it

If my region in the Sahara were excluded, it would strongly undermine our development, with a risk of opening the door to radicalisation and undermining the stability of the whole Mediterranean region, especially with respect to security and migration.

News in Brief

  1. Poland questions supremacy of EU court
  2. Medvedev to meet Juncker and Merkel in Brussels
  3. Italians and Czechs least favourable to remaining in EU
  4. Facebook hack set to be first major test of EU data rules
  5. Barnier open to extending Brexit transition period
  6. Juncker mulls rejection of Italy's 2019 budget
  7. German justice minister to lead SPD in European elections
  8. Tusk: May should come with new Brexit proposals

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. International Partnership for Human RightsOpen letter to Emmanuel Macron ahead of Uzbek president's visit
  2. International Partnership for Human RightsRaising key human rights concerns during visit of Turkmenistan's foreign minister
  3. NORDIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERSState of the Nordic Region presented in Brussels
  4. NORDIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERSThe vital bioeconomy. New issue of “Sustainable Growth the Nordic Way” out now
  5. NORDIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERSThe Nordic gender effect goes international
  6. NORDIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERSPaula Lehtomaki from Finland elected as the Council's first female Secretary General
  7. NORDIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERSNordic design sets the stage at COP24, running a competition for sustainable chairs.
  8. Counter BalanceIn Kenya, a motorway funded by the European Investment Bank runs over roadside dwellers
  9. ACCACompany Law Package: Making the Best of Digital and Cross Border Mobility,
  10. International Partnership for Human RightsCivil Society Worried About Shortcomings in EU-Kyrgyzstan Human Rights Dialogue
  11. UNESDAThe European Soft Drinks Industry Supports over 1.7 Million Jobs
  12. Mission of China to the EUJointly Building Belt and Road Initiative Leads to a Better Future for All

Latest News

  1. MEPs demand more from EU on human rights in Asia
  2. EU migration solutions are on the table - let's adopt them
  3. No progress at Brexit summit, talks continue
  4. May faces EU leaders head-to-head as Brexit deal falters
  5. Nordic region's top bank in new Russia funds complaint
  6. Why 'Spitzenkandidat' is probably here to stay
  7. EU ministers struggle to deal with Poland and Hungary
  8. Commission tried to hide details of 'WiFi4EU' glitch

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. International Partnership for Human RightsCivil society asks PACE to appoint Rapporteur to probe issue of political prisoners in Azerbaijan
  2. ACCASocial Mobility – How Can We Increase Opportunities Through Training and Education?
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersEnergy Solutions for a Greener Tomorrow
  4. UNICEFWhat Kind of Europe Do Children Want? Unicef & Eurochild Launch Survey on the Europe Kids Want
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Countries Take a Stand for Climate-Smart Energy Solutions
  6. Mission of China to the EUChina: Work Together for a Better Globalisation
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersNordics Could Be First Carbon-Negative Region in World
  8. European Federation of Allergy and AirwaysLife Is Possible for Patients with Severe Asthma
  9. PKEE - Polish Energy AssociationCommon-Sense Approach Needed for EU Energy Reform
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region to Lead in Developing and Rolling Out 5G Network
  11. Mission of China to the EUChina-EU Economic and Trade Relations Enjoy a Bright Future
  12. ACCAEmpowering Businesses to Engage with Sustainable Finance and the SDGs

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersCooperation in Nordic Electricity Market Considered World Class Model
  2. FIFAGreen Stadiums at the 2018 Fifa World Cup
  3. Mission of China to the EUChina and EU Work Together to Promote Sustainable Development
  4. Counter BalanceEuropean Ombudsman Requests More Lending Transparency from European Investment Bank
  5. FIFARecycling at the FIFA World Cup in Russia
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersOECD Report: Gender Equality Boosts GDP Growth in Nordic Region
  7. Centre Maurits Coppieters“Peace and Reconciliation Is a Process That Takes Decades” Dr. Anthony Soares on #Brexit and Northern Ireland
  8. Mission of China to the EUMEPs Positive on China’s New Measures of Opening Up
  9. Macedonian Human Rights MovementOld White Men are Destroying Macedonia by Romanticizing Greece
  10. Counter BalanceControversial EIB-Backed Project Under Fire at European Parliament
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersIncome Inequality Increasing in Nordic Countries
  12. European Jewish CongressEU Leaders to Cease Contact with Mahmoud Abbas Until He Apologizes for Antisemitic Comments

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us