Monday

4th Jul 2022

Opinion

The Socialists should oppose the nomination of Barroso

  • "To be the opposition in a democracy is not a negligible role, in fact it is an important one" (Photo: EUobserver)

Commission president José Manuel Barroso's campaign for re-election cleared its latest hurdle at the end of presidency European Council meeting earlier this month. Mr Barroso was unanimously, if provisionally, nominated by the assembled heads of state and government to serve a further five year term.

Unanimously? There were no other candidates. Mr Barroso has been modestly successful, if not outspoken or visionary, in the post and there was no other name being seriously mentioned.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Criticisms of Mr Barroso for not having been more visionary and outspoken as a leader miss the point. As long as the European Council remains the place where the main decision about who should be Commission president is taken, and as long as the members of the European Council want to see the Commission as a whole remain relatively weak, "outspoken" and "visionary" are likely to be negative attributes as much as positive ones. Mr Barroso cannot be blamed for that.

And provisionally? The transition from the Nice treaty to the Lisbon treaty is still underway – indeed, is still not assured – and it is not entirely clear under which set of rules the new Commission should be established. Most of the differences are procedural, and no doubt can be overcome somehow, but one of the differences is political and is the cause of an interesting debate.

One of the virtues of the Lisbon treaty is that it gives a stronger role to the European Parliament in the choice of Commission president. There must be consultation with the political parties after the European elections, which themselves must be taken into account by the European Council in making its choice. The Socialists object to the rubber-stamping of Mr Barroso's nomination without the proper involvement of the EP, in particular because he was the nominee of the centre-right EPP group.

As has been observed in these pages before, the Socialists are on difficult ground when they object to Mr Barroso's nomination now, given that they did not put forward an alternative candidate of their during the elections.

The whole world knew that a choice of Commission president was coming, but the Socialists chose not to share their thoughts on the subject with the voters. The election results were most notable for a swing away from the Socialists towards the EPP: perhaps these two facts are connected.

But even if they lost the election, there is still a role for the Socialists in the European Parliament. That is the role of the opposition.

To be the opposition in a democracy is not a negligible role, in fact it is an important one. It is perfectly legitimate – indeed it is essential – for there to be a group within the political system that disagrees with the policies being pursued and that wants to see different ones followed instead. If there is not such a group, it is likely that the hard and difficult choices are being dodged rather than confronted.

The discussion about how to make the European Union more democratic tends to focus on the mechanical aspects of the institutions, such as what powers the MEPs should have, rather than the human aspects, such as how they should use those powers. The development of an opposition within the European Parliament is a good example of a human aspect of the institutional system that needs to be developed and which will make the whole EU system more democratic.

Even though they did not put forward their own candidate at the time of the elections, and even though there is only one obvious person to be president of the Commission, the Socialists still have the opportunity to do democracy a service and vote against Mr Barroso when his nomination comes before the European Parliament.

The writer is a commentator on European affairs, based in London, and a member of the board of Federal Union.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

The human rights aspects of Grenoble's 'burkini' controversy

Sooner or later, the European Court of Human Rights will have a final say on whether Grenoble is allowed to permit the 'burkini'. Its judgment, like the one permitting the outlawing of full-face veils, risks influencing policymaking across the continent.

Council must act on core of EU migration package

By only screening, fingerprinting or relocating (some) refugees, or by outsourcing our border control to Turkey and giving Erdogan our keys, we will not solve the current problems.

Nato's Madrid summit — key takeaways

For the most part Nato and its 30 leaders rose to the occasion — but it wasn't without room for improvement. The lesson remains that Nato still doesn't know how or want to hold allies accountable for disruptive behaviour.

If Russia collapses — which states will break away?

Increasingly, analysts — both inside and outside of Russia — are considering the possibility of the Russian Federation's collapse into a series of independent states. Who are the most likely candidates for secession in Russia's south, east, and centre?

The euro — who's next?

Bulgaria's target date for joining the eurozone, 1 January 2024, seems elusive. The collapse of Kiril Petkov's government, likely fresh elections, with populists trying to score cheap points against the 'diktat of the eurocrats', might well delay accession.

Column

One rubicon after another

We realise that we are living in one of those key moments in history, with events unfolding exactly the way Swiss art historian Jacob Burckhardt describes them: a sudden crisis, rushing everything into overdrive.

Expect Czech EU presidency to downgrade V4 priorities

The Czech Republic is already in the throes of an extremely difficult period — several waves of Covid, high inflation, energy fears, an influx of Ukrainian refugees and a Prague corruption scandal. Now it has the EU presidency.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers write to EU about new food labelling
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersEmerging journalists from the Nordics and Canada report the facts of the climate crisis
  4. Council of the EUEU: new rules on corporate sustainability reporting
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers for culture: Protect Ukraine’s cultural heritage!
  6. Reuters InstituteDigital News Report 2022

Latest News

  1. Ex-Frontex chief 'uninvited' from parliament committee
  2. Czech presidency and key nuclear/gas vote This WEEK
  3. The human rights aspects of Grenoble's 'burkini' controversy
  4. Council must act on core of EU migration package
  5. Nato's Madrid summit — key takeaways
  6. Czech presidency to fortify EU embrace of Ukraine
  7. Covid-profiting super rich should fight hunger, says UN food chief
  8. EU pollution and cancer — it doesn't have to be this way

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us