Malta and Estonia could take over UK’s EU presidency
By Eszter Zalan
Two of the smallest EU nations could take over the UK’s job of holding the rotating presidency of the union next year.
British prime minister David Cameron told fellow leaders on Tuesday (28 June) that they would have to wait for his successor to decide if the UK would still retain its role, sources familiar with talks said.
Dear EUobserver reader
Subscribe now for unrestricted access to EUobserver.
Sign up for 30 days' free trial, no obligation. Full subscription only 15 € / month or 150 € / year.
- Unlimited access on desktop and mobile
- All premium articles, analysis, commentary and investigations
- EUobserver archives
EUobserver is the only independent news media covering EU affairs in Brussels and all 28 member states.
♡ We value your support.
If you already have an account click here to login.
The British chairmanship had been scheduled for the second half of 2017.
Other leaders asked Cameron to let them know as soon as possible so that they could make alternative arrangements if need be.
Malta takes over the presidency at the start of next year and Estonia was due to follow Britain in 2018.
Malta would prefer Estonia’s chairmanship to be brought forward to cover the UK, a move that would also bring forward the rest of the EU presidency calendar.
Malta, with a population of some 450,000, has already tripled the staff at its EU diplomatic mission, from around 45 to 150, to cope with the tasks.
It also has made contractual and financial arrangements for the presidency, so it is less flexible to move its dates.
But Malta’s prime minister Joseph Muscat has said he is open to discussion about splitting the UK’s six months with Estonia, or about Malta doing a one-year stint.
There could be legal complications on splitting the six month-long period, however.
According to the Lisbon Treaty, which introduced a new trio system in 2009, three member states are meant to share each 18-month presidency period in terms of closer cooperation.
“It is simpler to change the rotation than the period,” an EU official said.
Presiding over a longer presidency would also mean extra costs for the member state in charge. An EU official said other member states might offer financial assistance is the situation arose.
Estonia, a Baltic country with a population of 1.3 million, has also started preparations for its presidency. They upped their staff from around 70 to 100, This will be doubled for the presidency period.
“We need to be flexible, prepare different scenarios. It would not be easy, but we will manage,” said an EU source. The source said that advancing Estonia’s term also posed “difficult” legal questions.
Estonian prime minister Taavi Roivas had on said Monday about the possible change of schedule: "We have thought about it. We’ve prepared for it and we'll cope with it."
The order of the presidencies is decided by member states, so the EU Council will have to make the final decision.
What is the council presidency?
The rotating presidency is in charge of pushing legislation or other decisions through the EU institutions.
It no longer speaks for the EU on the world stage, as presidencies used to prior to Lisbon, which also introduced the new posts of EU Council president and EU foreign relations chief.
It is also supposed to be a neutral broker.
But presidencies still set the agenda for legislative talks in sectoral areas, giving the host state ample opportunity to promote national interests.
The job usually requires years of preparation and the reshuffling of diplomatic staff in the country in charge. Malta, for instance, started its preparations in 2013 - four years before assuming the post.
“It’s not the end of the world if we don’t find out until September what the UK wants to do, but the sooner would be the better of course,” an EU source said.