Thursday

28th Mar 2024

Court case could affect EU arrest warrant

The EU's highest court will this week rule on a Belgian case that could have EU-wide consequences for the European Arrest Warrant – one of the bloc's main tools for fighting terrorism and cross-border crimes.

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) will on Thursday (3 May) give a judgment on whether a key principle of the EU arrest warrant is compatible with European law on criminal proceedings.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Get the EU news that really matters

Instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • The European Court of Justice will decide on Thurday (3 May) (Photo: OLAF)

The European Arrest Warrant (EAW), which came into force in January 2004 after an EU governments' decision in 2002, allows judges in EU states to call upon other member states' governments to extradite suspects, including their own nationals.

However, a Flemish association of lawyers - Advocaten voor de Wereld – challenged the Belgian law that put the arrest warrant in to force in Belgium on two accounts. The Belgian arbitration court then referred the case to the ECJ to rule on the legality of the EU arrest scheme.

The association questioned the legal basis of the law and whether the right legislative instrument had been chosen, arguing that the "dual criminality" waiver in the EAW is effectively discriminatory.

Dual criminality means that the act concerned must be a crime in both the country in which it occurred and the country in which the arrest takes place.

The EU warrant lists 32 serious offences to which the principle "dual criminality" does not apply.

Instead the principle of "mutual recognition" applies, meaning that a judge in member state A does not have to approve an accusation in member state B before extraditing its citizen to member state B.

These 32 specific offences include those involving terrorism, drugs, weapons, human organ trafficking and murder.

The organisation argues that the abolition of the dual criminality principle in the EAW is unlawful because a crime which is murder in member state B might "only" be manslaughter in member state A.

Manslaugter is not one of the 32 offences listed but the extradition would still be carried out in the name of murder because of the dual criminality waiver.

"If the European Court of Justice finds in favour of the arguments made by the NGO then this could have a dramatic effect on the legality of the Framework Decision itself, not just in Belgium," said Anand Doobay, lawyer and EAW expert at the UK law firm, Peters and Peters.

Opinion against the lawyers group

However, last September, the ECJ's advocate general in the case, Damaso Ruiz-Jarabo, defended the arrest warrant – the advocate general's opinion is followed by the main judgement of the court in most cases.

Mr Ruiz-Jarabo argued that the legal base and method of implementation was fully in line with EU law and that the abolition of "dual criminality" in the 32 specific offences "does not contravene the principle of legality in criminal proceedings or the principle of equality."

The case is the latest in a string of issues surrounding the European Arrest Warrant.

Directly after the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington in September 2001, the EU was spurred to finally reach agreement on the European warrant, a piece of legislation that had been languishing in the EU's legal pipelines for years.

However, several member states missed the 2004 deadline for implementation and some oithers - Germany, Poland and Cyprus – were further delayed after encountering legal problems when applying the warrant, as it contradicted national constitutions.

On top of this, each of the EU member states has a different legal system complicating attempts to make common rules across the bloc.

A legal technicality in Germany earlier this year resulted in a German court's refusal to extradite a war crimes suspect - a former SS officer – to Denmark where he was wanted for murder.

EU still struggling with anti-terror laws five years after 9/11

Five years after 9/11 the EU is still struggling every step of the way to get its own anti-terror laws put in place - hampered by political mistrust and the physical fact of having 25 member states each with different legal systems and histories.

Ex-Nazi officer dodges EU extradition rules

Denmark has expressed disappointment over a German court's refusal to extradite a war crimes suspect - a former SS officer - on a legal technicality, exposing weakness in the EU arrest warrant scheme.

EU clinches deal on transfer of criminal evidence across borders

EU ministers have hammered out rules to make it easier for judges and prosecutors to exchange evidence needed for cross-border investigations, while the Netherlands secured itself against a flood of evidence requests for drugs that citizens from other countries bought on its territory, where it is legal.

EU Parliament set to sue EU Commission over Hungary funds

The European Parliament will likely take the European Commission to court for unblocking more than €10bn in funds for Hungary last December. A final nod of approval is still needed by European Parliament president, Roberta Metsola.

EU Commission clears Poland's access to up to €137bn EU funds

The European Commission has legally paved the way for Poland to access up to €137bn EU funds, following Donald Tusk's government's efforts to strengthen the independence of their judiciary and restore the rule of law in the country.

Opinion

Potential legal avenues to prosecute Navalny's killers

The UN could launch an independent international investigation into Navalny's killing, akin to investigation I conducted on Jamal Khashoggi's assassination, or on Navalny's Novichok poisoning, in my role as special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, writes the secretary-general of Amnesty International.

Opinion

I'll be honest — Moldova's judicial system isn't fit for EU

To state a plain truth: at present, Moldova does not have a justice system worthy of a EU member state; it is riven with corruption and lax and inconsistent standards, despite previous attempts at reform, writes Moldova's former justice minister.

Latest News

  1. German bank freezes account of Jewish peace group
  2. EU Modernisation Fund: an open door for fossil gas in Romania
  3. 'Swiftly dial back' interest rates, ECB told
  4. Moscow's terror attack, security and Gaza
  5. Why UK-EU defence and security deal may be difficult
  6. EU unveils plan to create a European cross-border degree
  7. How migrants risk becoming drug addicts along Balkan route
  8. 2024: A Space Odyssey — why the galaxy needs regulating

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic Food Systems Takeover at COP28
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersHow women and men are affected differently by climate policy
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersArtist Jessie Kleemann at Nordic pavilion during UN climate summit COP28
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP28: Gathering Nordic and global experts to put food and health on the agenda
  5. Friedrich Naumann FoundationPoems of Liberty – Call for Submission “Human Rights in Inhume War”: 250€ honorary fee for selected poems
  6. World BankWorld Bank report: How to create a future where the rewards of technology benefit all levels of society?

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsThis autumn Europalia arts festival is all about GEORGIA!
  2. UNOPSFostering health system resilience in fragile and conflict-affected countries
  3. European Citizen's InitiativeThe European Commission launches the ‘ImagineEU’ competition for secondary school students in the EU.
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region is stepping up its efforts to reduce food waste
  5. UNOPSUNOPS begins works under EU-funded project to repair schools in Ukraine
  6. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsGeorgia effectively prevents sanctions evasion against Russia – confirm EU, UK, USA

Join EUobserver

EU news that matters

Join us