Wednesday

26th Jun 2019

Wilders trial: Judge rejects request to quiz Dutch PM

  • Women protesting in March 2014, days after Wilders made the "fewer, fewer" comment (Photo: Alex Proimos)

Judges have refused a series of requests from defence lawyers at the trial of anti-EU Dutch politician Geert Wilders, including an attempt to call prime minister Mark Rutte to testify.

The court also denied a request to replace a judge accused by Wilders of being partisan and rejected an attempt to have the trial suspended after defence documents were leaked.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

  • Wilders: "PVV haters in this fake court apparently already have their verdict" (Photo: Metropolico.org)

Wilders is on trial for comments he made in March 2014, when he asked a crowd if they wanted “more or fewer Moroccans” in their country. After the crowd cheered “fewer, fewer”, he responded: “Then we will arrange that.”

He has been charged with insulting a group based on race, inciting hatred and a more general offence of discrimination.

The case is likely to focus on two core European values: Wilders will claim he was exercising free speech, prosecutors will argue that he is guilty of discrimination.

But even before the trial began last month, Wilders had already said the case was “political”.

On the first day in court, Wilders asked one of the three judges to leave. He thought she could not give an impartial judgment because she had publicly criticised the outcome of a previous criminal case against Wilders.

He was cleared of all charges in that case in 2011.

Wilders' lawyer had also asked the court to suspend the trial, after a newspaper published information from leaked documents from the defence.

“Apparently someone has gained access to these documents,” said defence lawyer Geert-Jan Knoops in March, noting that Wilders could not be guaranteed a fair trial if he could not communicate with his lawyer in confidence.

But the court disagreed.

“The defence is in no way curtailed,” said Judge Hendrik Steenhuis, who also refused to order an investigation into the leak.

He noted that such an inquiry could be done by the defence itself, and added that the law firm could report the breach to the police.

According to the leak, Wilders' defence wanted to question Mark Rutte, several ministers and Dutch EU commissioner Frans Timmermans. But judge Steenhuis said the court did not need to hear from them.

“It is our job to judge the statements,” he said, noting that what Wilders said in 2014 was not disputed by either side.

Steenhuis did honour one request from the defence, by allowing the hearing of an extra 20 people whom it wanted to call for testimony.

Wilders himself was not present in the court room on Thursday. He was in The Hague in a parliament debate about the Brussels terror attacks.

In a statement sent via Twitter, his main medium for communicating to the press and public, Wilders repeated that he was not getting a fair trial.

"PVV haters in this fake court apparently already have their verdict," he wrote, using the initials for his Party of Freedom.

The next session will be on 26 May.

Agenda

Full house in Brussels This WEEK

Busy week ahead in Brussels with five council meetings, a Eurogroup and the European Parliament's plenary on the agenda .

Wilders convicted for insulting Moroccans

Dutch court says far right politician should not have made his statements calling for "fewer Moroccans" in 2014. However, he will not receive any jail sentence or fine.

Chemnitz neo-Nazis pose questions for Germany

UN human rights commissioner urged EU leaders to condemn violence that recalled the 1930s, but the local situation in former East Germany does not apply to the whole country.

News in Brief

  1. EU warns Turkey as 'Gezi Park' trials begin
  2. EU universities to share students, curricula
  3. Migrant rescue ship loses Human Rights Court appeal
  4. Denmark completes social democrat sweep of Nordics
  5. Johnson offers 'do or die' pledge on Brexit
  6. Weber indirectly attacks Macron in newspaper op-ed
  7. EU to sign free trade deal with Vietnam
  8. EU funding of air traffic control 'largely unnecessary'

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. International Partnership for Human RightsEU-Uzbekistan Human Rights Dialogue: EU to raise key fundamental rights issues
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNo evidence that social media are harmful to young people
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersCanada to host the joint Nordic cultural initiative 2021
  4. Vote for the EU Sutainable Energy AwardsCast your vote for your favourite EUSEW Award finalist. You choose the winner of 2019 Citizen’s Award.
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersEducation gets refugees into work
  6. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank
  7. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  8. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  9. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  10. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate

Latest News

  1. EU moves to end car-testing 'confidentiality clause'
  2. EU parliament gives extra time for leaders on top jobs
  3. Europe's rights watchdog lifts Russia sanctions
  4. EU-Vietnam trade deal a bad day for workers' rights
  5. EU 'special envoy' going to US plan for Palestine
  6. Polish judicial reforms broke EU law, court says
  7. EU study: no evidence of 'East vs West' food discrimination
  8. Russia tried to stir up Irish troubles, US think tank says

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us