Friday

19th Apr 2019

Investigation

Dieselgate MEPs unhappy with 'hopeless' commission

  • Green MEP Eickhout (top right) during a plenary meeting last February. 'Don't say there wasn't proof, because you didn't look for it' (Photo: Greens/EFA)

Just like other public officials, members of the European Parliament's inquiry committee into the dieselgate scandal sometimes forget their microphones are still on.

On Tuesday (21 June), centre-right MEP Krisjanis Karins could be heard calling the four witnesses representing the European Commission “completely incompetent”, while liberal MEP Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy was later heard muttering “hopeless, hopeless”.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

It was the first time that representatives of the European Commission, the EU's executive body, appeared in front of the investigative committee as official witnesses.

But it did not take Superman-like hearing abilities to establish that the MEPs of the committee were deeply frustrated with the Commission.

MEPs kept hitting a brick wall, despite being armed with increasing evidence that people within the commission may have had suspicions that cheating software was the reason why toxic emissions were much higher on the road than in the laboratory.

In November 2014, Karl Falkenberg, director-general of the commission's environment department, wrote to his counterpart in the industry department to ask for an investigation into the discrepancy.

However, the EU commission has always maintained it had “no indication” that carmakers used cheating software, called defeat devices in the EU legislation that banned them.

The representatives of the commission present on Tuesday's hearing repeated that line.

“The risk of defeat devices was known, but the commission was not aware of any actual instances of fraud,”said Gwenole Cozigou, director of industrial policy and economics analysis at the commission's industry directorate.

At best, that was an evasive answer. Because MEPs wanted to know why the commission did not investigate the matter in the first place.

“Everytime you say there was no concrete proof, it's because you did not put forward an investigation that was asked for,” said Green MEP Bas Eickhout.

“Don't say there wasn't proof, because you didn't look for it.”

Awkward silences

A recurring scene during the three-hour hearing, was the four witnesses consulting while the awkward silence between question and answer was growing, sometimes for as long as 40 seconds.

Eickhout called the responses “disappointing” and called on the commission not to give “false information”.

But it was not only members from the left side of the parliament's committee that were critical.

Centre-right MEP Karins was visibly annoyed with the long time the witnesses needed to answer simple questions.

“What I'm looking for is a non-scripted answer,” he asked at one point.

Another annoyance the MEPs expressed during the hearing, was that they didn't receive all the documents, including emails during the relevant period they were investigating.

Blaming member states? Only confidentially

The commission representatives were also asked repeatedly which member states blocked the implementation of a real driving emissions test, but they refused to say.

They refused also to acknowledge that some member states were blocking the process, but rather said these countries “were just not agreeing with the proposal”.

Beyond “countries from the south and east of the continent”, no names were given in public.

However, they did agree to provide that information to MEPs in a confidential manner.

The commission and parliament are currently working out the details of how MEPs can access confidential documents, with the commission proposing that only MEPs and two staff members from the committee can see them in a secure reading room. They would not be allowed to take notes.

For their part, the commission witnesses refuted the notion that they were uncooperative.

“We're doing our best to give honest replies. We should not be accused of not being honest in front of this committee,” said Cozigou.

This website was not able to confirm what MEPs were saying off microphone during that statement.

Analysis

EU governments duck responsibility on dieselgate

If VW had cheated on emissions in the Netherlands, its fine would have been just €19,500. “I didn't think about the fines before,” the Dutch transport minister says.

Car makers caught out on dodgy EU claim

Carmakers claim they don't know what "normal" driving conditions are in terms of EU law. But their own lobby group already decided 14 years ago.

German MPs to also probe Dieselgate

Bundestag inquiry committee has more enforcement tools than its EU counterpart to ensure witnesses like former commissioner Guenther Verheugen will appear.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank
  2. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  3. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  4. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  5. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  9. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  10. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic commitment to driving global gender equality
  12. International Partnership for Human RightsMeet your defender: Rasul Jafarov leading human rights defender from Azerbaijan

Latest News

  1. Romania drafts EU code on NGO migrant rescues
  2. Bulgaria, Hungary, and Malta shamed on press unfreedom
  3. EU drafts $20bn US sanctions list in aviation dispute
  4. Brunei defends stoning to death of gay men in EU letter
  5. US Democrats side with Ireland on Brexit
  6. Wifi or 5G to connect EU cars? MEPs weigh in
  7. How Brexit may harm the new EU parliament
  8. EU parliament backs whistleblower law

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNICEFUNICEF Hosts MEPs in Jordan Ahead of Brussels Conference on the Future of Syria
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic talks on parental leave at the UN
  3. International Partnership for Human RightsTrial of Chechen prisoner of conscience and human rights activist Oyub Titiev continues.
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic food policy inspires India to be a sustainable superpower
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersMilestone for Nordic-Baltic e-ID
  6. Counter BalanceEU bank urged to free itself from fossil fuels and take climate leadership
  7. Intercultural Dialogue PlatformRoundtable: Muslim Heresy and the Politics of Human Rights, Dr. Matthew J. Nelson
  8. Platform for Peace and JusticeTurkey suffering from the lack of the rule of law
  9. UNESDASoft Drinks Europe welcomes Tim Brett as its new president
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers take the lead in combatting climate change
  11. Counter BalanceEuropean Parliament takes incoherent steps on climate in future EU investments
  12. International Partnership For Human RightsKyrgyz authorities have to immediately release human rights defender Azimjon Askarov

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us