15th Apr 2024

'Right to internet' battle lost as parliament concedes no legal basis

  • The deal is a major reversal of the parliament's position for much of the last year (Photo: European Commission)

Early Thursday morning the European Parliament and EU member states finally reached a deal over a long-delayed telecoms package when MEPs softened their opposition to French-style 'three-strikes' laws aimed at illegal internet downloaders, ending for now the Brussels debate on a fundamental 'right' to internet access.

In a reversal of the parliament's position for much of the last year, MEPs in behind-closed-doors negotiations with the Council of Ministers, representing the member states, embraced new language in a compromise text that no longer requires that only judicial authorities be allowed to cut off internet access.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Get the EU news that really matters

Instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Rather than requiring that a judge alone be the authority to order a severing of the internet connection, the compromise text reads that only a "prior fair and impartial procedure" is necessary, a phrasing that is sufficiently ambiguous that has allowed both sides to claim a win.

The Greens, who had led the battle against internet cut-off in the parliament, called the result a clear victory.

"The message from this EU legislation is clear: access to the internet is a fundamental right and proper procedures must be followed when challenging internet users on alleged copyright infringement," said UK Green MEP Caroline Lucas.

"It is now up to national governments to respect this."

MEP Christian Engstroem, of the Swedish pro-downloading Pirate Party, which is allied with the Greens in the chamber, said the bill now "puts up a strong line of defence against the ‘three strike' Hadopi law in France and similar measures being pushed by Lord Mandelson in the UK."

But digital rights advocates remained underwhelmed.

"This text does provide legal ammunition to continue the fight against restrictions of internet access," said Jérémie Zimmerman, of France-based La Quadrature du Net, who added however: "The agreed text does not meet the challenge of clearly preserving a fundamental right of access to the net."

Young voters

The overall package originally had little to do with internet piracy originally, focussing on improving competition in the sector. Indeed, euro-deputies had no dispute with the Council over the bulk of the legislation.

But twice in the past year, MEPs with strong majorities inserted an amendment to the telecoms package that would have forbidden member states from restricting internet access without judicial authorisation and only in exceptional circumstances.

The move was in reaction to France's ‘three strikes' or ‘Hadopi' law, named for the new government agency charged with hunting down the pirates, backed by a series of special piracy judges, to cut off internet access and even jail repeat offenders after the third offence.

The UK has in the past week announced it too is to introduce a similar three-strikes bill and the Dutch parliament has called on the government to come forward with its own version of the law.

MEPs had strongly argued ahead of the European elections in June that three-strikes legislation is draconian and, with an eye to young voters, vowed to continue their opposition to such laws, maintaining that access to the internet had now essentially become a fundamental right as vital as access to water or electricity.

The deputies maintained that so many aspects of a citizen's participation in society - from paying bills to dealing with local government to reading the news - now required access to the internet that cutting off access from the digital world was depriving someone of a host of other rights.

The argument kicked off a global debate on whether access to the internet really was now evolving into just such a human right, with some arguing the parliament was quite premature in its advocacy of an internet access entitlement and others cheering the chamber for being at the cutting edge of digital democracy.

Resistance worn down

On 6 October, telecoms ministers formally rejected the parliament's key amendment - the now infamous Amendment 138 - requiring a ‘conciliation' process between the two sides.

On Thursday, this process concluded with the parliament backing away from the barricades.

Pressure from member states is understood to have worn down resistance from the elected chamber, not merely due to the desire on the part of a number of countries to introduce tough anti-piracy bills, but also because EU capitals felt that the European Parliament was getting too big for its britches and encroaching in a judicial area responsibility for which is jealously guarded by European national governments.

MEPs in the end capitulated before this argument, conceding that they had no competence to legislate in this field.

How Amazon lobbyists could be banned from EU Parliament

Amazon is one step closer to being banned from the European Parliament after the employment committee complained of a lack of cooperation in recent years — what is the process, and when can a final decision be expected?

EU deal on new gig-workers rules unlikely before June elections

Another provisional agreement on improving working conditions for platform workers fall apart on Friday, as four member states decided not to support it — making the chances of a directive before the June European elections unlikely.

EU agrees less ambitious rules on platform work

A new provisional agreement on the platform workers directive has been reached — but what has changed from the previous deal, and how will it affect the expected reclassification of 5.5 million platform workers as "employees"?


Why are the banking lobby afraid of a digital euro?

Europeans deserve a digital euro that transcends the narrow interests of the banking lobby and embodies the promise of a fairer and more competitive monetary and financial landscape.

Latest News

  1. EU special summit, MEPs prep work, social agenda This WEEK
  2. EU leaders condemn Iran, urge Israeli restraint
  3. UK-EU deal on Gibraltar only 'weeks away'
  4. Belgium declares war on MEPs who took Russian 'cash'
  5. Brussels Dispatches: Foreign interference in the spotlight
  6. Calling time on Amazon's monopolism and exploitation
  7. Resist backlash on deforestation law, green groups tell EU
  8. China's high-quality development brings opportunities to the world

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic Food Systems Takeover at COP28
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersHow women and men are affected differently by climate policy
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersArtist Jessie Kleemann at Nordic pavilion during UN climate summit COP28
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP28: Gathering Nordic and global experts to put food and health on the agenda
  5. Friedrich Naumann FoundationPoems of Liberty – Call for Submission “Human Rights in Inhume War”: 250€ honorary fee for selected poems
  6. World BankWorld Bank report: How to create a future where the rewards of technology benefit all levels of society?

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsThis autumn Europalia arts festival is all about GEORGIA!
  2. UNOPSFostering health system resilience in fragile and conflict-affected countries
  3. European Citizen's InitiativeThe European Commission launches the ‘ImagineEU’ competition for secondary school students in the EU.
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region is stepping up its efforts to reduce food waste
  5. UNOPSUNOPS begins works under EU-funded project to repair schools in Ukraine
  6. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsGeorgia effectively prevents sanctions evasion against Russia – confirm EU, UK, USA

Join EUobserver

EU news that matters

Join us