Monday

4th Mar 2024

Commission and MEPs clash over corporate tax-reporting rules

  • Only 10 of the 27 member states have transposed the public country-by-country reporting directive (Photo: EC - Audiovisual Service)
Listen to article

A clash between the EU Commission and some MEPs over limiting corporate tax transparency took place on Thursday (13 July) during the plenary session in Strasbourg.

At the centre of the debate was a bill, agreed two years ago as a response to scandals such as the Panama Papers, that will allow citizens to see what companies pay in tax in the EU, and where.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Get the EU news that really matters

Instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The so-called public country-by-country reporting (CbCR) directive will require multinationals to publish information on their websites about the taxes they pay in the EU from 2026.

The law should have been transposed into national law by 22 June, but in practice only 10 of the 27 member states have done so.

In addition to this delay, MEPs are concerned about an information letter on so-called 'gold-plating' sent by the commission to member states in recent weeks — behind MEPs' backs.

"This information letter by the commission conveys the impression of a potential constraint to curb the possible willingness of member states to expand the scope of the directive," reads a letter sent yesterday (12 July) by the rapporteurs of the file to the EU commissioner Mairead McGuinness.

A directive is a legally-binding instrument for all member states, but it allows them to go beyond that scope when transposing it to the national level. This is what is meant by gold-plating (adding additional layers to the baseline legislation), and this is where the problem lies.

In the letter, the commission cites some "examples of areas where gold plating might arise". An issue that MEPs say has the potential to limit the information that EU capitals are willing to provide.

"We need more transparency, not less," said Green MEP Rasmus Andresen during the debate in Strasbourg.

"It is a bit of scandal that you as commissioner want to put the brakes on member states," he said, addressing McGuinness.

This approach to EU capitals has also provoked scathing reactions from NGOs such as the European Network on Debt And Development (Eurodad).

"It is urgently needed and fully justified for EU member states to go beyond what is specified in the directive," said its tax coordinator, Tove Maria Ryding.

According to the NGO, the directive does not ensure the provision of all the necessary data per country to detect large-scale corporate tax evasion.

"It's deeply ironic that the commission is now trying to use the directive to stop member states from fixing this fundamental problem and delivering real corporate transparency to their citizens," Ryding said.

During the debate, McGuinness stressed that the letter contains a number of technical issues and is therefore only guidance on how to implement the directive effectively.

"Those who want member states to have more ambition remain free to go beyond this directive," she said.

However, McGuinness underlined the consequences of divergent implementation by capitals. "Patchy implementation on the country-by-country reporting due to gold plating could lead to an unlevelled playing field," the EU commissioner said.

For MEP Evelyn Regner of the Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group, the commissioner's response to the technical nature of her letter was not enough, as these guidelines have a "political influence".

"The guidelines are clearly overshooting the mandate of the European Commission," Regner told EUobserver.

The directive sets some minimum standards for member states, but they can do better, she thinks. Especially as the regulation contains a clause encouraging member states to go beyond the scope of the directive.

The commission's current position would therefore be in contradiction with what was agreed with the co-legislators in 2021.

The S&D MEP maintained her demand for clear answers on the commission's mandate, believing that the institution is not giving a correct interpretation of the reality.

"Only with transparency you can do checks and balances, otherwise, taxes are hidden," Regner stressed.

Wanted: 1m signatures for EU tax on super-rich

A group of activists, economists, politicians, and even some billionaires, have registered an initiative calling on the EU to introduce an tax on the very rich to fund social and environmental transitions — is it feasible?

EU report tests targeting tax cuts at low-paid

The EU Commission report analysed a series of hypothetical reforms to the tax systems of Austria, Hungary, Italy, Belgium and Spain, and found targeted measures have a greater impact on labour supply than across-the-board cuts in personal income tax.

Global 'billionaires tax' could raise €236bn, report finds

The EU-funded research lab proposes a global minimum two-percent annual tax — levied on the wealth, rather than income, of the world's 2,756 richest people (who pay far less tax than ordinary citizens relative to their income)

Opinion

The six-hour U-turn that saw the EU vote for austerity

The EU's own analysis has made it clear this is economic self-sabotage, and it's politically foolish three months from European elections where the far-right are predicted to increase support, writes the general secretary of the European Trade Union Confederation.

'Outdated' rules bar MEP from entering plenary with child

During a plenary session in Strasbourg, an MEP was denied access to the chamber because he was carrying his young child, due to unforeseen circumstances. The episode shows parliament's rules need to be updated, several MEPs told EUobserver.

Latest News

  1. EU must overhaul Africa trade offer to parry China, warns MEP
  2. EU watchdog faults European Commission over Libya
  3. Hungary's Ukrainian refugees in two minds as relations sour
  4. The six-hour U-turn that saw the EU vote for austerity
  5. Defence, von der Leyen, women's rights, in focus This WEEK
  6. The farming lobby vs Europe's wolves
  7. EU socialists fight battle on two fronts in election campaign
  8. EU docks €32m in funding to UN Gaza agency pending audit

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic Food Systems Takeover at COP28
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersHow women and men are affected differently by climate policy
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersArtist Jessie Kleemann at Nordic pavilion during UN climate summit COP28
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP28: Gathering Nordic and global experts to put food and health on the agenda
  5. Friedrich Naumann FoundationPoems of Liberty – Call for Submission “Human Rights in Inhume War”: 250€ honorary fee for selected poems
  6. World BankWorld Bank report: How to create a future where the rewards of technology benefit all levels of society?

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsThis autumn Europalia arts festival is all about GEORGIA!
  2. UNOPSFostering health system resilience in fragile and conflict-affected countries
  3. European Citizen's InitiativeThe European Commission launches the ‘ImagineEU’ competition for secondary school students in the EU.
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region is stepping up its efforts to reduce food waste
  5. UNOPSUNOPS begins works under EU-funded project to repair schools in Ukraine
  6. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsGeorgia effectively prevents sanctions evasion against Russia – confirm EU, UK, USA

Join EUobserver

EU news that matters

Join us