Thursday

29th Feb 2024

MEPs debate tightening up lobbying rules

MEPs on Thursday launched the thorny debate on tightening rules covering the thousands of EU lobbyists in Brussels, with an initial discussion showing deputies in favour of defining the term "lobbyist" as broadly as possible but shying away from the 600-page rulebook that defines and confines lobbyists in the US.

At the moment, the European Parliament has 2,951 permanent lobbyists and some 2000 temporary lobbyists - with access to the EU assembly restricted to eight times per year. The parliament also its own code of conduct for interest groups.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Get the EU news that really matters

Instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

However, MEPs have been prompted to revisit the guidelines by the increasing instances of 'front companies' in Brussels whereby big businesses set up an innocuous facade company to press their case, as well as by the proliferation of informal "intergroups" within the EU assembly that represent specific interests, but that are not required to make financial declarations and whose membership is somewhat murky.

Even for Cardinals

Centre-right Finnish MEP Alexander Stubb, in charge of drawing up a report on the issue, says that anyone who "comes to my office wanting to influence legislation" should be considered a lobbyist, including NGO representatives, business groups, trade unions and lawyers.

Even Cardinals would not escape the label if coming to press the case for Christianity to be mentioned in the new EU treaty, noted the Finn, who says he hopes he is not being the "blue-eyed Nordic boy" by pushing for Finnish levels of transparency.

MEPs in the constitutional affairs committee generally agreed that the term should be defined as widely as possible.

They also agreed that the European Commission and parliament should set up a common register of all the lobbyists in Brussels, with estimates suggesting there are around 15,000 of them in the city pressing their case at the European institutions.

Some MEPs said the EU Council - representing member states and the most closed of the main EU institutions - should also be pressed to join.

"They are the same lobbyists at all the institutions. We may as well follow them on their travels," said Green French MEP Gerard Onesta.

Footnotes

There was also broad support for a "legislative footprint" under which MEPs in charge of drawing up reports would include all the interest groups they have heard in the footnotes of their report.

Some 30 people contacted Mr Stubb over this lobbying topic - he includes the names in his draft report.

Critics of the idea say that the number will rise massively because lobbyists will want to prove to their bosses that they have done their job by getting their names in a footnote.

Others note that lobbying in the parliament is going to intensify anyway under the new EU treaty - due to come into place next year - as MEPs' powers to co-legislate are significantly extended with the document.

Mandatory or voluntary?

The most disagreement came over whether there should be a mandatory or voluntary register of lobbyists.

Mr Stubb is pushing for the "less complicated" voluntary register for which he was heckled by Green MEPs.

"Only a mandatory register will get rid of [front companies]," said Luxembourg MEP Claude Turmes.

The Finnish MEP is also leaning towards financial disclosure of lobbyists but "not too detailed."

Instead, companies could be required to indicate how much they spend on lobbying in each year from a set of ball-park figures (such as €50,000 - €100,000).

US system is a step too far

Most MEPs agreed that the US system is a step "too far." Members of Congress and lobbyists in Washington have to acquaint themselves with almost 600 pages of rules. One famous one being that if a politician is present at an event or gathering there cannot be a sit down lunch or dinner as this could be misconstrued. Standing up while eating is fine, however.

For his part, Mr Stubb says he is not out to demonise lobbyists, whose activities have come to light recently during the ferocious lobbying on legislation that took place during the development of the chemicals, services and software patent laws.

He points out that it is much easier to get information as a civil servant, but that as an MEP, "you are out of the [information] loop and interest groups are good sources of information."

He is due to formally present his report to the constitutional affairs committee next week, with a committee vote planned for March and a plenary vote by May.

The European Commission is due to deliver proposals on this issue as well later this year, but has come under criticism for also opting for a voluntary lobbyist register.

Analysis

Almost 20 names in running for EU top jobs

With four months until the European Parliament elections, there are already some 20 names in the hat for the ensuing reshuffle of EU top jobs.

EUobserved

New government in Belfast is much ado about not much

The deal to restore Northern Ireland's government — after nearly two years — is being spun as a major triumph. But not much has changed. This is an exercise in fine-tuning and political window-dressing.

Investigation

Far-right MEPs least disciplined in following party line

In a fractious parliamentary vote, the level of party discipline often decides the fate of legislation. Party discipline among nationalists and far-right MEPs is the weakest, something potentially significant after the June elections. Data by Novaya Gazeta Europe and EUobserver.

Latest News

  1. Podcast: Hyperlocal meets supranational
  2. Von der Leyen appeals for 'new EU defence mindset'
  3. EU supply chain law fails, with 14 states failing to back it
  4. Joined-up EU defence procurement on the horizon?
  5. Macron on Western boots in Ukraine: What he really meant
  6. Amazon lobbyists banned from EU Parliament
  7. MEPs adopt new transparency rules for political ads
  8. EU nature restoration law approved after massive backlash

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic Food Systems Takeover at COP28
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersHow women and men are affected differently by climate policy
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersArtist Jessie Kleemann at Nordic pavilion during UN climate summit COP28
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP28: Gathering Nordic and global experts to put food and health on the agenda
  5. Friedrich Naumann FoundationPoems of Liberty – Call for Submission “Human Rights in Inhume War”: 250€ honorary fee for selected poems
  6. World BankWorld Bank report: How to create a future where the rewards of technology benefit all levels of society?

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsThis autumn Europalia arts festival is all about GEORGIA!
  2. UNOPSFostering health system resilience in fragile and conflict-affected countries
  3. European Citizen's InitiativeThe European Commission launches the ‘ImagineEU’ competition for secondary school students in the EU.
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region is stepping up its efforts to reduce food waste
  5. UNOPSUNOPS begins works under EU-funded project to repair schools in Ukraine
  6. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsGeorgia effectively prevents sanctions evasion against Russia – confirm EU, UK, USA

Join EUobserver

EU news that matters

Join us