Sunday

23rd Sep 2018

Magazine

Big victories and rollbacks for data in year of terror

  • Max Schrems, a 28-year-old Ph.D law student at Vienna University, took on Facebook for privacy violation. Here in the European Parliament with Green MEP Jan Philipp Albrecht- (Photo: Martin Hanzel)

Austrian student Max Schrems walked out of the courtroom in Luxembourg with a large smile on his face.

In his first appearance before Europe's top judges in late March, the privacy campaigner had scored another victory.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

  • EU counter-terrorism coordinator Gilles de Kerchove: "Never let a serious crisis go to waste". (Photo: Council of the European Union)

Judges backed his argument that a 15-year-old data sharing and transfer pact with the United States had been compromised. It was the first big crack in the so-called Safe Harbour agreement and a major blow to the social network giant Facebook.

A few months later in October, the same judges delivered a stunning verdict and invalidated the agreement for violating fundamental privacy rights.

Big companies like Apple and Google, along with some 4,000 other US firms, had relied on Safe Harbour to transfer and process the personal data of EU nationals. Now they had to look elsewhere.

"This is not bashing the US case, this is a mass surveillance issue", Schrems told EUobserver after the final verdict.

Edward Snowden, the former NSA agent who blew the lid off US-led mass surveillance that helped nail Safe Harbour, congratulated the Austrian in a widely shared tweet. "Congratulations, @MaxSchrems. You've changed the world for the better."

But the Luxembourg Safe Harbour verdict is not without precedent.

Safe Habour ruling

Last year, the same court scrapped an EU data retention agreement for similar reasons. That law was spawned in the aftermath of the Madrid and London bombings.

Both cases point to a broader clash between fundamental rights and national security where the European Commission, as guardian of the treaties, has proven itself out of its depth.

The Brussels executive sees no policy contradiction between the two. Earlier this year it said that security and respect for fundamental rights are "consistent and complementary policy objectives."

But those policy objectives appear increasingly blurred.

The Safe Harbour ruling was all the more extraordinary given the widespread push for increased surveillance and police oversight following the Jewish museum shooting in Brussels last year and the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris in January.

"Never let a serious crisis go to waste"

A dozen people died in the Paris shooting in January. Around a week later, the EU's counter-terrorism coordinator, Gilles de Kerchove, told stunned onlookers that an unprecedented opportunity had arisen.

"It is a fact of political life that governments and parliaments are much more motivated just after an attack", the Belgian senior European Union official said at a civil liberties committee (LIBE) meeting.

"Never let a serious crisis go to waste".

It is a message that resonates.

A few months later the LIBE committee caved into pressure and endorsed a Commission proposal on passenger name records (PNR).

First proposed in 2011, PNR had been stuck at the committee level for years. Most MEPs opposed its broad underlying surveillance measures while others questioned its effectiveness in tracking down EU nationals who leave for Syria to fight alongside the Islamic State.

The Commission had been quietly financing national PNR projects throughout the debates.

German Green MEP Jan Phillip Albrecht warned PNR risked ending up in the scrap heap with data retention if it ever went to the European Court of Justice.

The EU's data privacy chief Giovanni Buttarelli also voiced his complaints.

"I'm still waiting for the relevant evidence to demonstrate, even in terms of the amount of money, and years to implement this system, how much it is essential," he said.

But French interior minister Bernard Cazeneuve was dispatched to Brussels to convince them otherwise. He lobbied individual MEPs to sign off on PNR following the Paris murders, saying it would help deter terrorism.

The coup worked. The controversial bill went into inter-institutional talks in September and is likely to get rubber-stamped into law before the end of the year.

Smart borders

France had also evoked broad new national surveillance measures sparking outcry from civil liberty defenders.

At the same time in Brussels, French technocrats at the European council, representing member states, pushed for EU-wide rules requiring travelling EU nationals to give their fingerprints and possibly also have their faces scanned.

The idea is part of a larger digital dragnet known as the 'smart borders' package, to be proposed next spring.

Then Paris happened, again. On Friday 13 November, French and Belgian nationals killed 130 people in a carefully-staged attack.

A few days later, the centre-right EPP announced that talks should be suspended on a new EU data protection directive that grants law enforcement access to personal data.

Their lead negotiator said the draft contained too many bureaucratic privacy checks and safeguards for police to operate effectively. Suspending the talks could have implications for the wider EU data protection regulation. Both are linked and both are set, after years of talks, to be put into law before the end of the year.

The European Commission also jumped on the Paris bandwagon.

EU commissioner for migration Dimitris Avramopoulos announced an EU Internet forum "to strengthen cooperation" between government ministers and CEOs of major Internet companies in their fight against online jihadist propaganda.

It is an alliance that is set to test, once again, the Commission's awkward balancing act on security and respect for fundamental rights.

This story was originally published in EUobserver's 2015 Europe in Review Magazine.

Click here to read previous editions of Europe in Review magazines.

Stakeholder

Challenges for a driverless future

Advancing towards a driverless future brings on a new set of challenges and questions on how connectivity and mobility will affect all aspects of life.

Magazine

Macron: Hegelian hero of EU history?

The election of the 39-year old newcomer injected new hope and dynamism. But the French president still has to find solid allies in the EU and deliver his ambitious agenda at home.

Magazine

In 2018, make Europe great again!

Is the EU back on track to make Europe great again? The fifth edition of EUobserver's Europe in Review magazine looks at the biggest events that shaped the EU in 2017 and prospects for 2018.

Magazine

Brexit timeline - 'The clock is ticking'

'The clock is ticking' - a favourite phrase of EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier - has become a stark warning, as the UK government took nine months to initiate the Brexit process and even longer to clarify its positions.

Magazine

In 2018, make Europe great again!

Is the EU back on track to make Europe great again? The fifth edition of EUobserver's Europe in Review magazine looks at the biggest events that shaped the EU in 2017 and prospects for 2018.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. NORDIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERSThe vital bioeconomy. New issue of “Sustainable Growth the Nordic Way” out now
  2. NORDIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERSThe Nordic gender effect goes international
  3. NORDIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERSPaula Lehtomaki from Finland elected as the Council's first female Secretary General
  4. NORDIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERSNordic design sets the stage at COP24, running a competition for sustainable chairs.
  5. Counter BalanceIn Kenya, a motorway funded by the European Investment Bank runs over roadside dwellers
  6. ACCACompany Law Package: Making the Best of Digital and Cross Border Mobility,
  7. IPHRCivil Society Worried About Shortcomings in EU-Kyrgyzstan Human Rights Dialogue
  8. UNESDAThe European Soft Drinks Industry Supports over 1.7 Million Jobs
  9. Mission of China to the EUJointly Building Belt and Road Initiative Leads to a Better Future for All
  10. IPHRCivil society asks PACE to appoint Rapporteur to probe issue of political prisoners in Azerbaijan
  11. ACCASocial Mobility – How Can We Increase Opportunities Through Training and Education?
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersEnergy Solutions for a Greener Tomorrow

Latest News

  1. Brexit and MEPs expenses in the spotlight This WEEK
  2. Wake-up call on European Day Against Islamophobia
  3. Sound of discord at 'Sound of Music' Salzburg summit
  4. Salzburg summit presses for bigger Frontex mandate
  5. UK's post-Brexit plan 'will not work', EU says
  6. Airbnb agrees to clarify pricing for EU
  7. Libya keeps coast guards rejected by the EU
  8. EU divisions on menu at Salzburg dinner

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNICEFWhat Kind of Europe Do Children Want? Unicef & Eurochild Launch Survey on the Europe Kids Want
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Countries Take a Stand for Climate-Smart Energy Solutions
  3. Mission of China to the EUChina: Work Together for a Better Globalisation
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordics Could Be First Carbon-Negative Region in World
  5. European Federation of Allergy and AirwaysLife Is Possible for Patients with Severe Asthma
  6. PKEE - Polish Energy AssociationCommon-Sense Approach Needed for EU Energy Reform
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region to Lead in Developing and Rolling Out 5G Network
  8. Mission of China to the EUChina-EU Economic and Trade Relations Enjoy a Bright Future
  9. ACCAEmpowering Businesses to Engage with Sustainable Finance and the SDGs
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersCooperation in Nordic Electricity Market Considered World Class Model
  11. FIFAGreen Stadiums at the 2018 Fifa World Cup
  12. Mission of China to the EUChina and EU Work Together to Promote Sustainable Development

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us