Wednesday

7th Dec 2022

Ten states push back on EU pesticide law, citing food crisis

  • The European Commission is considering a ban on the use of pesticides in areas such as parks, playgrounds, or nature protected sites (Photo: jetsandzeppelins)
Listen to article

Ten countries have joined forces to water down the ambition of a flagship EU environmental policy on pesticides, according to an internal document dated 8 June and seen by EUobserver.

Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia want a list of exceptions — which would excuse a country if it does not meet the pesticide-reduction target included in the upcoming law.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

EU agriculture ministers are expected to discuss the proposal in Luxembourg on Monday (13 June).

With war raging in Ukraine, concerns over food security have been on the rise — rolling back EU climate policies.

New EU rules on the sustainable use of pesticides, a key initiative of the EU's Farm to Fork strategy, were postponed in mid-March after what campaigners say has been an intensive campaign by pro-pesticide farming lobbies.

They are now due to be published on 22 June, although environmental groups are afraid of a new delay — and have been calling on the commission to stick to the timeline.

The proposal would set an EU-wide legally binding 50 percent pesticide-reduction target by 2030.

But the group of central and eastern European states has raised concerns over the impact of such policies on the food crisis that is currently unfolding as a result of the Russian blockade of Ukraine's grain exports.

"Food security and the competitiveness of the EU agricultural production have been facing many challenges … [which] have been further exacerbated by Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine," their joint statement said.

In such context, they say, it is crucial to provide "stability" and "proportional measures" to European farmers and consumers.

The so-called 'non-paper' includes a list of exceptions that would excuse member states for their continued or increased use of pesticides.

They said countries should be allowed to change the course of action if "the member state foresees that it will not achieve national 2030 reduction target due to unpredictable reasons" such as new pests, the occurrence of invasive species or structural changes in agriculture".

Meanwhile, a recent report has contradicted official claims that the use of toxic pesticides is declining in the EU, showing how more and more fruits and vegetables contain traces of these chemicals.

EU auditors, for their part, raised doubts about the system used to measure progress toward pesticide-reduction targets in 2020. Risk indicators have been also a source of concern to campaigners and the organic community.

Overall, sales of pesticides in the EU have remained stable since 2011 and the uptake of non-chemical pesticides is relatively low, according to data provided by Eurostat.

Guaranteeing food security

"Doing nothing is clearly not an option," EU health commissioner Stella Kyriakides told MEPs last week.

The upcoming proposal will include binding targets although there will be different national targets, she said. "This is necessary to move forward … [but] all member states will have to make an effort."

Nevertheless, the group of 10 member states has noted that the 50-percent pesticide-reduction target will apply to the EU as a whole.

"Setting the obligation to act instead of the obligation to reach the target will secure better implementation of the legislation," they also said in the non-paper.

They argue that the contribution of individual countries to achieving these targets should take into account the intensity of pesticide use in each member state and "the need for plant protection in order to maintain a sufficient level of agricultural production, guaranteeing food security."

In March, a larger group of countries warned that the reduction targets adopted in the new law should not lead to "a reduction in agricultural production" that could cause food shortages in the EU.

Kyriakides has argued that data shows that it is possible "to reduce the use of pesticides without compromising food security," pointing out that the current crisis should help strengthen the resilience of food systems.

Under the upcoming legislation, a ban on the use of pesticides in areas such as parks, playgrounds, or nature protection sites is also being considered, the health commissioner said.

Interview

'Without pesticide reduction, we'll have a food crisis in Europe'

Despite tough lobbying, the EU commission is set to present this week the first binding EU law mandating farmers to reduce their use of chemicals. Long-term food security must not be sacrificed for short-term gains, says EU commissioner Frans Timmermans.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersLarge Nordic youth delegation at COP15 biodiversity summit in Montreal
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP27: Food systems transformation for climate action
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region and the African Union urge the COP27 to talk about gender equality
  4. International Sustainable Finance CentreJoin CEE Sustainable Finance Summit, 15 – 19 May 2023, high-level event for finance & business
  5. Friedrich Naumann Foundation European DialogueGender x Geopolitics: Shaping an Inclusive Foreign Security Policy for Europe
  6. Obama FoundationThe Obama Foundation Opens Applications for its Leaders Program in Europe

Latest News

  1. EU takes legal action against China over Lithuania
  2. EU Commission shoring up children's rights of same-sex parents
  3. The military-industrial complex cashing-in on the Ukraine war
  4. EU delays Hungary funds decision, as Budapest vetoes Ukraine aid
  5. Borrell gets pension from MEP fund set for taxpayer bailout
  6. Autocrats make us all less secure
  7. Big Agri's lies: green EU farming not to blame for food insecurity
  8. German top court declares €800bn EU recovery fund 'legal'

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos
  2. European Committee of the RegionsRe-Watch EURegions Week 2022
  3. UNESDA - Soft Drinks EuropeCall for EU action – SMEs in the beverage industry call for fairer access to recycled material
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic prime ministers: “We will deepen co-operation on defence”
  5. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us